Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation

CFIUS Modernization

The U.S. Department of the Treasury has issued proposed regulations to implement CFIUS reforms enacted under the Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act of 2018 (“FIRRMA”). Certain provisions of FIRRMA went into effect immediately upon its adoption in August 2018, but many of the provisions of the legislation require regulations to be prescribed by CFIUS […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on CFIUS Modernization

Examining Corporate Priorities: The Impact of Stock Buybacks on Workers, Communities and Investors

Thank you, Chairwoman Maloney and Ranking Member Huizenga, for inviting me to speak today [Oct. 17, 2019]. It is an honor to be here. My name is Lenore Palladino, and I am Assistant Professor of Economics & Public Policy at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, a Fellow at the Roosevelt Institute, and Research Associate at […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Institutional Investors, Securities Regulation, Speeches & Testimony | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Examining Corporate Priorities: The Impact of Stock Buybacks on Workers, Communities and Investors

Thank you for inviting me to appear today [Oct. 17, 2019] to discuss corporate priorities as they relate to share repurchase program, workers, communities, and investment. I am the Madison S. Wigginton Professor of Finance at Vanderbilt University’s Owen Graduate School of Management and a Professor of Law at the Vanderbilt School of Law. I […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Accounting & Disclosure, Institutional Investors, Securities Regulation, Speeches & Testimony | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Examining Corporate Priorities: The Impact of Stock Buybacks on Workers, Communities and Investors

How the Type of Buyer May Affect a Target’s Remedies

In exploring a potential public company sale, target boards rightly focus on the amount and type of consideration offered by potential buyers and the level of deal certainty. However, when considering offers (including at early stages in the process), target boards should also take into account the risk of a buyer breach, including in connection […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on How the Type of Buyer May Affect a Target’s Remedies

Proxy Access and Leverage

Thanks to thecorporatecounsel.net for catching this announcement from NYC Comptroller Scott Stringer and the NYC Retirement Systems, which reported that, since the inception of the Comptroller’s “Boardroom Accountability Project,” there has been a 10,000% increase in the number of companies with proxy access. Stringer began the Project in 2014 with proxy access proposals submitted to 75 companies. At the […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Proxy Access and Leverage

The Consequences to Directors of Deploying Poison Pills

How consequential is a firm’s adoption of a poison pill for the firm’s directors? Prior research reflects three conflicting views about this question, which reflect conflicting views about pills themselves. The entrenchment view holds that poison pills entrench managers at shareholders’ expense, implying that directors who adopt pills face the risk of shareholder backlash and […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Boards of Directors, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Corporate Elections & Voting, Empirical Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Consequences to Directors of Deploying Poison Pills

Filing Thresholds and Main Street Investors

On May 8, 2019, SEC Chairman Jay Clayton testified to the Senate that “[o]ur first goal, which has been a priority of mine since I became Chairman, is focusing on the interests of our long-term Main Street investors.” He went on to say that “the question we ask ourselves every day: how does our work […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Filing Thresholds and Main Street Investors

Time To Demand Accountability Regarding Mutual Fund “Risks”

The case law on who bears the risks inherent in a mutual fund’s operations is becoming paradoxical, and may now require intervention by mutual fund boards. Investment advisors have, incredibly, convinced some federal courts that they bear enormous risks in operating their mutual funds—so much so that they’re justified in charging hundreds of millions of […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Time To Demand Accountability Regarding Mutual Fund “Risks”

SEC Guidance on Excludability of Rule 14a-8 Shareholder Proposals, Eschewing One-Size-Fits-All Approach

Yesterday, the Staff of the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance provided additional guidance in Staff Legal Bulletin (SLB) No. 14K on two key considerations for excluding Rule 14a-8 shareholder proposals under the “ordinary business” exception of Rule 14a-8(i)(7): the significance of the proposal’s subject matter and whether it seeks to “micromanage” the company. SLB 14K also […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Corporate Elections & Voting, Legislative & Regulatory Developments, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on SEC Guidance on Excludability of Rule 14a-8 Shareholder Proposals, Eschewing One-Size-Fits-All Approach

Conducting a Token Offering Under Regulation A

For many (if not all) companies developing blockchain-based technologies that involve digital assets (“tokens”), success is dependent on two critical issues: (1) the ability of a project sponsor (the “token issuer”) to distribute tokens broadly to its targeted users, often as rewards for contributing to a project’s development, and (2) free transferability of the tokens, […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Conducting a Token Offering Under Regulation A