-
Supported By:
Subscribe or Follow
Program on Corporate Governance Advisory Board
- Peter Atkins
- David Bell
- Kerry E. Berchem
- Richard Brand
- Daniel Burch
- Paul Choi
- Jesse Cohn
- Arthur B. Crozier Christine Davine
- Renata J. Ferrari
- Andrew Freedman
- Ray Garcia
- Byron Georgiou
- Joseph Hall
- Jason M. Halper William P. Mills
- David Millstone
- Theodore Mirvis
- Philip Richter
- Elina Tetelbaum
- Sebastian Tiller
- Marc Trevino Jonathan Watkins
- Steven J. Williams
HLS Faculty & Senior Fellows
Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation
Setting Directors’ Pay Under Delaware Law
The Delaware Chancery’s refusal to dismiss a derivative allegation in a suit claiming that Goldman Sachs directors were paid excessively may soon provide a decision that offers companies guidance on setting board of director pay (Stein v. Blankfein, Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, C.A. No. 2017-0354-SG (Del. Ch. May. 31, 2019). This guidance […]
Click here to read the complete postTrends in Executive Compensation
Executive compensation is not only a consideration close to the pocket book of CFOs but also a topic of increasing importance to managements and boards. As major economies show signs of recovering from the 2008 recession, compensation can become more decisive to retaining and motivating critical senior executive talent. But, executive compensation also continues to […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Executive Compensation, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Boards of Directors, CFOs, Compensation committees, Compensation regulation, Engagement, Executive Compensation, Incentives, Pay for performance, Public perception, Risk-taking
Comments Off on Trends in Executive Compensation
Modernizing Bank Merger Review
The biggest irony of the 2008 financial crisis is that the market crash was both initially triggered and ultimately alleviated by massive bank mergers. A wave of mergers by Bank of America, Citigroup, JPMorgan, and Wells Fargo in the late 1990s created the “too big to fail” banks that became so central to the crisis. […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Banking & Financial Institutions, Financial Regulation, Mergers & Acquisitions
Tagged Bank Holding Company Act, Banks, Financial crisis, Financial institutions, Financial regulation, Mergers & acquisitions, Systemic risk
Comments Off on Modernizing Bank Merger Review
2019 Proxy Season Recap and 2020 Trends to Watch
Overview At first glance, the patterns and trends of the 2019 proxy season don’t seem to indicate shifts that are beyond marginal in terms of proxy voting impact. But in closer analysis, in conjunction with recent investor behavior and industry trends (e.g., Business Roundtable Statement on the Purpose of a Corporation signed by 181 CEOs […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Executive Compensation, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Board composition, Boards of Directors, Diversity, ESG, Executive Compensation, Institutional Investors, IPOs, ISS, Pay for performance, Proxy advisors, Proxy season, Say on pay, Shareholder elections, Shareholder proposals
Comments Off on 2019 Proxy Season Recap and 2020 Trends to Watch
Response to SEC Subcommittee Recommendations—Universal Ballot and Vote Confirmations
If effecting change at a single institution is like reversing the course of an aircraft carrier, revamping the proxy system is something akin to turning around a whole fleet. Undaunted by the task, it appears that the SEC’s Investor Advisory Committee has gotten nearly all of its own boats pointed in the same direction. At […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Institutional Investors, Securities Regulation
Tagged Boards of Directors, Institutional Investors, Proxy advisors, Proxy voting, SEC, Securities regulation, Shareholder voting, Universal proxy ballots
Comments Off on Response to SEC Subcommittee Recommendations—Universal Ballot and Vote Confirmations
Reforming Pensions While Retaining Shareholder Voice
In my article, Reforming Pensions While Retaining Shareholder Voice, published in the Boston University Law Review as part of the symposium on Institutional Investor Activism in the 21st Century: Responses to A Changing Landscape, I argue that the ongoing shift in the public sector from defined benefit to defined contribution pension plans is taking place […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Institutional Investors
Tagged 401(k), Institutional Investors, Pension funds, Retirement plans, Shareholder rights, Shareholder voting
Comments Off on Reforming Pensions While Retaining Shareholder Voice
Is Your Board Accountable?
Shareholders and regulators across the globe are demanding improvements in board oversight of corporate culture. Institutional investors seek to better understand companies’ approaches to human capital management (“HCM”), tone at the top, and the attendant reputational risks. Corporate culture is a business issue for companies and their boards. The new generation of workers weighs workplace […]
Click here to read the complete postNo-Action Requests to Exclude Shareholder Proposals—A Change of Approach
As foreshadowed by Corp Fin Director Bill Hinman at an event in July put on by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce (see this PubCo post), Corp Fin has announced that it is revisiting its approach to responding to no-action requests to exclude shareholder proposals. In essence, the staff may respond to some requests orally, instead […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Corporate Elections & Voting, Legislative & Regulatory Developments, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation
Tagged Boards of Directors, Institutional Investors, No-action letters, Proxy season, Proxy voting, Rule 14a-8, SEC, Securities regulation, Shareholder proposals, Shareholder voting
Comments Off on No-Action Requests to Exclude Shareholder Proposals—A Change of Approach
PE Sale of Portfolio Company to a SPAC
SPAC activity has enjoyed a healthy uptick in recent years. More SPACs went public in 2018 than in any year since 2007, raising more than $10 billion in capital to deploy towards new investment opportunities. Private equity sponsors are increasingly finding themselves on the opposite side of the table from SPACs as the owner of […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications, Private Equity
Tagged IPOs, Mergers & acquisitions, Private equity, Public firms, Special purpose vehicles
Comments Off on PE Sale of Portfolio Company to a SPAC
ISS 2019 Benchmarking Policy Survey—Key Findings
[On Sept. 11, 2019], Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. (ISS) announced the results of its 2019 Global Policy Survey (a.k.a. ISS 2019 Benchmark Policy Survey) based on respondents including investors, public company executives and company advisors. ISS will use these results to inform its policies for shareholder meetings occurring on or after February 1, 2020. ISS expects to solicit comments […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Boards of Directors, ESG, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Board composition, Boards of Directors, Capital structure, Climate change, Disclosure, Diversity, Environmental disclosure, ESG, Institutional Shareholder Services Inc., Oversight, Proxy advisors, Risk oversight, Sustainability
Comments Off on ISS 2019 Benchmarking Policy Survey—Key Findings