Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation

Proxy Access: The 2015 Proxy Season and Beyond

Although the 2015 annual meeting season is still winding down, there is no doubt that proxy access has gained considerable momentum and will remain a front-and-center corporate governance issue for the foreseeable future. For the boards of directors of the many companies who were bystanders on this issue for the 2015 proxy season, the question […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Proxy Access: The 2015 Proxy Season and Beyond

DGCL Amendments Authorize Exclusive Forum Provisions and Prohibit Fee-Shifting Provisions

A great deal of attention has been paid over the past few years to efforts made by corporations to control in which courts internal corporate claims may be brought or to compel unsuccessful plaintiffs in internal corporate claims to pay the defendant’s attorneys’ fees and costs. Recently enacted amendments [1] to the Delaware General Corporation […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Legislative & Regulatory Developments, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on DGCL Amendments Authorize Exclusive Forum Provisions and Prohibit Fee-Shifting Provisions

SEC and CFTC Turn to Swaps and Security-Based Swaps Enforcement

The week of June 15, 2015 saw two of the first publicly announced enforcement actions brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) to enforce security-based swap and swap regulatory requirements under Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act. The SEC accepted an offer of settlement from a web-based […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Derivatives, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on SEC and CFTC Turn to Swaps and Security-Based Swaps Enforcement

Fed’s Volcker Relief for Foreign Funds

On Friday, June 12, 2015, the Federal Reserve (Fed) began addressing the question of whether foreign funds should be considered “banking entities” under the Bank Holding Company Act (BHCA), and therefore be subject to the Volcker Rule’s proprietary trading restriction. The Fed’s guidance (provided in the form of a “Frequently Asked Question,” or FAQ) clarifies […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Banking & Financial Institutions, Financial Regulation, International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Fed’s Volcker Relief for Foreign Funds

SEC Proposes Rules on Mandatory Clawback Policies

On July 1, 2015, the Securities and Exchange Commission proposed rules to require issuers of securities listed on U.S. stock exchanges to adopt and enforce clawback policies applicable to incentive-based compensation received by current and former executives in the three-year period preceding the date the issuer is required to prepare an accounting restatement due to […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Executive Compensation, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on SEC Proposes Rules on Mandatory Clawback Policies

Clawbacks of Erroneously Awarded Compensation

A few months ago, the baseball world celebrated the 90th birthday of Yogi Berra, the legendary former catcher and manager for the New York Yankees. Yogi Berra is well-known for his witty comments, often referred to as “Yogi-isms.” [1] Several come to mind today, as we consider another rulemaking related to executive compensation. “Pair up […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Executive Compensation, Practitioner Publications, Speeches & Testimony | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Clawbacks of Erroneously Awarded Compensation

Does the SEC’s New “Compensation Actually Paid” Help Shareholders?

On April 29, 2015, the SEC released proposed rules on public company pay‐for‐performance disclosure mandated under the Dodd‐Frank Act. Pay Governance has analyzed the proposed rules and the implications for our clients’ proxy disclosures and pay‐for‐performance explanations to investors. We are concerned about the validity of describing a company’s pay‐for‐performance alignment using the disclosure mandated […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Executive Compensation, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Does the SEC’s New “Compensation Actually Paid” Help Shareholders?

Making Executive Compensation More Accountable

When it comes to compensation, Americans believe you should earn your money. They also believe, just as strongly, that you should not keep what you did not earn. It’s fundamental to our values. However, when companies have to restate their financial statements because they violated applicable reporting requirements, their executives may not be required to […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Executive Compensation, Practitioner Publications, Regulators Materials, Securities Regulation, Speeches & Testimony | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Making Executive Compensation More Accountable

Public Pension Funds’ Shareholder-Proposal Activism

America’s largest publicly traded companies are facing more shareholder proposals in 2015, driven principally by a “proxy access” campaign led by New York City Comptroller Scott Stringer, who oversees the city’s $160 billion pension funds for public employees. Elected in 2013, Stringer has launched a Boardroom Accountability Project seeking, in part, proxy access, which grants […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Corporate Elections & Voting, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Public Pension Funds’ Shareholder-Proposal Activism

The Role of Chief Compliance Officers Must be Supported

Chief Compliance Officers of Investment Advisers (CCOs) play an important and crucial role in fostering integrity in the securities industry. They are responsible for making sure that their firms comply with the rules that apply to their operations. As part of that effort, CCOs typically work with senior corporate leadership to instill a culture of […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Practitioner Publications, Regulators Materials, Securities Litigation & Enforcement, Speeches & Testimony | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Role of Chief Compliance Officers Must be Supported