-
Supported By:
Subscribe or Follow
HLS Faculty & Senior Fellows
Program on Corporate Governance Advisory Board
- Peter Atkins
- David Bell
- Kerry E. Berchem
- Richard Brand
- Daniel Burch
- Paul Choi
- Jesse Cohn
- Arthur B. Crozier
- Renata J. Ferrari
- Andrew Freedman
- Ray Garcia
- Joseph Hall
- Jason M. Halper William P. Mills
- David Millstone
- Theodore Mirvis
- Philip Richter
- Elina Tetelbaum
- Sebastian Tiller
- Marc Trevino
- Steven J. Williams
Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation
PE Firms Poised for Diversity Drive
Diversity has become a key focus for every industry in recent years, and private equity, like many other parts of the financial sector, still has significant progress to make in terms of diversity and inclusion. Private equity lags behind others in the financial services industry across a range of diversity metrics—according to a report published […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in ESG, Institutional Investors, International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Practitioner Publications, Private Equity
Tagged Diversity, ESG, EU, Human capital, Institutional Investors, International governance, Private equity, Private funds, UK
Comments Off on PE Firms Poised for Diversity Drive
Should Your Company Go Private?
Twenty-six public companies have gone private this year as of mid-May, totaling more than $121 billion in value. Compare that to 47 companies that did the same in all of 2021, the highest number of such deals in more than a decade, according to Dealogic. Dry powder is partially fueling these transactions as private equity firms compete […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Boards of Directors, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Boards of Directors, Disclosure, Going private, Mergers & acquisitions, Private firms, Public firms
Comments Off on Should Your Company Go Private?
Climate Disclosures: Not Quite as Easy as (Scope) 1-2-3
Executive Summary Public policy advocacy is an important part of an asset manager’s active ownership strategy. Asset managers recently had a key opportunity to influence U.S. climate policy as the SEC invited comments on its proposed rule for corporate disclosures of climate-related information. Climate-related risks have increasingly become important for many companies within various industries […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, ESG, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation
Tagged Climate change, Environmental disclosure, ESG, Materiality, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities regulation, Sustainability
Comments Off on Climate Disclosures: Not Quite as Easy as (Scope) 1-2-3
CSOs Have More Impact When Aligned To The CEO
Businesses are more likely to hit organizational ESG targets when their sustainability leader reports directly to a CEO with a demonstrated commitment to sustainability. Many organizations find it challenging to know where to start when adding a new Chief Sustainability Officer (CSO) role. Our recommendation is to provide them with a direct line to the […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, ESG, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Climate change, ESG, Management, Sustainability
Comments Off on CSOs Have More Impact When Aligned To The CEO
Statement by Chair Gensler on Proposed Joint Amendments to Form PF
Today [Aug. 10, 2022], the Commission is considering whether to propose joint amendments with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to Form PF, an important reporting tool that the Commission and the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC) use, respectively, to protect investors and monitor systemic risk. I am pleased to support the proposal because, if […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications, Private Equity, Regulators Materials, Securities Regulation, Speeches & Testimony
Tagged CFTC, Disclosure, Form PF, Hedge funds, Institutional Investors, Private equity, Private funds, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities regulation
Comments Off on Statement by Chair Gensler on Proposed Joint Amendments to Form PF
Statement by Commissioner Uyeda on Proposed Joint Amendments to Form PF
Thank you, Chair Gensler. Who benefits from investments in private funds and alternative investments? In many cases, they are the pensioners in a retirement plan or a university student who benefits from an endowment. In other words, Americans of all types benefit from a robust market for private funds that is diverse and provides sophisticated […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications, Private Equity, Regulators Materials, Securities Regulation
Tagged CFTC, Disclosure, Form PF, Hedge funds, Institutional Investors, Private equity, Private funds, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities regulation
Comments Off on Statement by Commissioner Uyeda on Proposed Joint Amendments to Form PF
Proposed Amendments to the Shareholder Proposal Rules
On July 13, 2022, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), by a 3-2 vote, proposed amendments to the proxy rules that would narrow certain grounds under which companies may exclude shareholder proposals from their proxy statements. Specifically, the proposed amendments would modify the standards for exclusion under the “substantial implementation,” the “duplication” and the […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Corporate Elections & Voting, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation
Tagged Institutional Investors, No-action letters, Proxy voting, Rule 14a-8, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities regulation, Shareholder proposals, Shareholder voting
Comments Off on Proposed Amendments to the Shareholder Proposal Rules
Twitter v. Musk: Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Counterclaim
Plaintiff Twitter, Inc. (“Twitter”), by and through its undersigned counsel, replies as follows to the Verified Counterclaims (the “Counterclaims”) of Elon R. Musk (“Musk”), X Holdings I, Inc., and X Holdings II, Inc. (each a “Defendant” and together, “Defendants” or the “Musk Parties”) as follows. Introduction Musk begins his answer to Twitter’s claims for breach […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement
Tagged Adverse effects, Disclosure, Elon Musk, Materiality, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Termination, Twitter
Comments Off on Twitter v. Musk: Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Counterclaim
The Market for CEOs: Evidence from Private Equity
A wide range of research examines the market for CEOs and executive mobility in public companies while largely ignoring the market for CEOs in private equity funded companies. The research on public companies typically finds low levels of mobility for CEOs, particularly recently. For example, Cziraki and Jenter (2021) study CEO changes at S&P 500 […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Empirical Research, Executive Compensation, Private Equity
Tagged Executive Compensation, Executive turnover, Human capital, Labor markets, Management, Private equity
Comments Off on The Market for CEOs: Evidence from Private Equity