-
Supported By:
Subscribe or Follow
Program on Corporate Governance Advisory Board
- Peter Atkins
- David Bell
- Kerry E. Berchem
- Richard Brand
- Daniel Burch
- Paul Choi
- Jesse Cohn
- Arthur B. Crozier Christine Davine
- Renata J. Ferrari
- Andrew Freedman
- Ray Garcia
- Byron Georgiou
- Joseph Hall
- Jason M. Halper William P. Mills
- David Millstone
- Theodore Mirvis
- Philip Richter
- Elina Tetelbaum
- Sebastian Tiller
- Marc Trevino Jonathan Watkins
- Steven J. Williams
HLS Faculty & Senior Fellows
Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation
Executives in Politics
Over the last two decades, the share of corporate executives holding political office in the United States increased substantially, which resulted in large benefits for their firms and shifted the balance of power toward corporate interests On November 8, 2016 Donald Trump won the U.S. Presidency. While his election was unusual in many respects, Trump […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Empirical Research
Tagged Congressional elections, Firm valuation, Management, Manager characteristics, Political spending, Social networks, US House, US Senate
Comments Off on Executives in Politics
Derivative Suits and Unlawful Business Practices
A Delaware court recently allowed a stockholder’s derivative complaint to proceed where the board of directors allegedly breached their duty of loyalty by knowingly allowing the company to violate a federal regulation. In upholding the complaint, the court examined the company’s prior SEC disclosures describing its business practices to conclude they violated the “plain language” […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Court Cases, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation
Tagged Boards of Directors, CFTC, Compliance and disclosure interpretation, Compliance officer, Delaware law, Derivative suits, Director liability, Disclosure, Dodd-Frank Act, Duty of loyalty, Fiduciary duties, Liability standards, Regulation 5.16, SEC, Securities enforcement, Securities litigation, Securities regulation, Shareholder suits
1 Comment
Representations and Warranties Insurance in M&A Transactions
Under a buy-side representations and warranties insurance (“RWI”) policy, the buyer in an M&A transaction recovers directly from an insurer for losses arising from certain breaches of the seller’s representations and warranties in the acquisition agreement. By shifting the risk of such losses from the seller to an insurer, the buyer and seller can limit […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Acquisition agreements, Deal protection, Due diligence, Indemnification, Liability standards, Loss recognition, Mergers & acquisitions, Negotiation, R&W insurance, Risk management
Comments Off on Representations and Warranties Insurance in M&A Transactions
Leverage, CEO Risk-Taking Incentives, and Bank Failure During the 2007-2010 Financial Crisis
The view that bankers’ compensation created the incentives that led to the latest financial crisis has prompted numerous proposals to regulate pay at financial institutions. However, despite the attention devoted to executive pay by regulators, extant research provides mixed support for the hypothesis that CEO compensation in the run-up to the crisis influenced bank risk […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Banking & Financial Institutions, Bankruptcy & Financial Distress, Executive Compensation, Financial Crisis
Tagged Bank debt, Banks, Debt, Executive Compensation, Failed banks, Financial crisis, Financial institutions, Incentives, Leverage, Management, Manager characteristics, Risk, Risk-taking
Comments Off on Leverage, CEO Risk-Taking Incentives, and Bank Failure During the 2007-2010 Financial Crisis
Do Professional Norms in the Banking Industry Favor Risk-taking?
Excessive risk-taking in the financial industry is thought to be one of the key contributor to the recent financial crisis (e.g., Diamond and Rajan, 2009; Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, 2011; Freixas and Dewatripont, 2012). Academics and policy makers have proposed several reasons for undesirably high levels of risk taking, including flawed compensation practices (Krugman 2009), […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Banking & Financial Institutions, Financial Crisis
Tagged Banks, Behavioral finance, Corporate culture, Financial crisis, Financial institutions, Managerial style, Risk, Risk-taking
Comments Off on Do Professional Norms in the Banking Industry Favor Risk-taking?
Remarks on ETFs, Disclosure, and Investor Trust
I would like to start out by thanking everyone in this room for what you do every day to help investors from all over the world save for retirement, college, and other important priorities. Although your client in the investment company space may be the fund sponsor, the investment adviser, or the fund itself—depending upon […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Practitioner Publications, Regulators Materials, Securities Regulation, Speeches & Testimony
Tagged Capital formation, Conflicts of interest, Disclosure, EDGAR, Exchange-traded funds, Financial reporting, Investment advisers, Investment Company Act, Investor protection, SEC, Securities regulation, Transparency
Comments Off on Remarks on ETFs, Disclosure, and Investor Trust
Audit Committee Disclosure Trends in Proxy Statements
Over the past several years, investors and other governance groups have sought expanded disclosures on how audit committees execute their duties. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) also weighed in on the discussion when it issued a request for public comment in a July 2015 concept release titled Possible Revisions to Audit Committee Disclosures. The […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation
Tagged Audit committee, Disclosure, Financial reporting, Internal auditors, Oversight, Proxy disclosure, Regulation S-K, Risk oversight, SEC, Securities regulation, Voluntary Disclosure
Comments Off on Audit Committee Disclosure Trends in Proxy Statements
Analysis of Statutory Appraisal Cases
Statutory appraisal actions remain one of the most closely watched areas of Delaware corporate law, and there have been significant developments in Delaware appraisal law. Recently, the Delaware Supreme Court provided additional guidance on appropriate valuation methodologies as it reversed and remanded the Delaware Court of Chancery in DFC Global Corporation v. Muirfield Value Partners, […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications, Private Equity
Tagged Appraisal rights, Delaware cases, Delaware law, DGCL, Fair values, Firm valuation, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Private equity
Comments Off on Analysis of Statutory Appraisal Cases
Excluding Shareholder Proposals Based on New SLB 141
Apple has submitted a letter to the SEC Staff arguing that the company should be able to exclude a shareholder proposal because its board has made a determination that the proposal is part of the company’s ordinary business. The proposal asks the company to establish a Human Rights Committee to enhance its policies and practices on human […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Corporate Elections & Voting, Corporate Social Responsibility, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation
Tagged Corporate Social Responsibility, Disclosure, ESG, Human rights, No-action letters, SEC, Securities regulation, Shareholder proposals, Shareholder voting
Comments Off on Excluding Shareholder Proposals Based on New SLB 141
CoCo Insurance and Bank Fragility
When a financial crisis hits, regulators are often forced to bailout failing financial institutions, especially large ones. The alternative of putting the failed banks through resolution and imposing losses on depositors and other bank creditors has been seen as too destabilizing in the middle of a crisis. It is not surprising, therefore, that regulators were […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Accounting & Disclosure, Banking & Financial Institutions, Bankruptcy & Financial Distress, Empirical Research, Financial Crisis, Securities Regulation
Tagged Bailouts, Banks, Capital requirements, Contracts, Convertible bonds, Credit default swaps, Credit risk, Debt contracts, Equity capital, Financial crisis, Financial institutions, Incentives, Insurance, Risk-taking
Comments Off on CoCo Insurance and Bank Fragility