Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation

The Legal Validity of Oral Agreements with Activist Investors

Recently in Sarissa Capital Domestic Fund LP v. Innoviva, Inc., the Delaware Court of Chancery specifically enforced a disputed oral settlement agreement in a proxy contest between Innoviva, Inc. and Sarissa Capital Management resulting in two dissident directors being seated on the Innoviva board. The court held that the principals of Innoviva and Sarissa had entered into a […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Legal Validity of Oral Agreements with Activist Investors

Can Taxes Mitigate Corporate Governance Inefficiencies?

Policymakers have long viewed tax policy as an instrument to influence and change corporate governance practices. Certain tax rules were enacted to discourage pyramidal business structures and large golden parachutes, and to encourage performance-based compensation. Other proposals, such as imposing higher taxes on excessive executive compensation, have also attracted increasing attention. Contrary to that view, […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Executive Compensation | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Can Taxes Mitigate Corporate Governance Inefficiencies?

Shareholder-Creditor Conflict and Payout Policy

In my article, Shareholder-Creditor Conflict and Payout Policy: Evidence from Mergers between Lenders and Shareholders, which is available on SSRN and is also forthcoming at the Review of Financial Studies, I show that the conflict of interests between shareholders and creditors induces corporations to pay excessive dividends at the expense of debt holders. The classical […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Bankruptcy & Financial Distress, Institutional Investors | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Shareholder-Creditor Conflict and Payout Policy

Appraisal Litigation Update

On December 14, the Delaware Supreme Court released a long-awaited opinion in Dell Inc. v. Magnetar Global Event Driven Master Fund Ltd. that reversed and remanded a high-profile appraisal case decided by the Delaware Court of Chancery in 2016. The Delaware Supreme Court built on its recent opinion in DFC Global Corporation v. Muirfield Value […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Appraisal Litigation Update

Do Activists Turn Bad Bidders into Good Acquirers?

The growing influence of activists in global capital markets has prompted financial economists to investigate the drivers of shareholder activism as well as the role of activists in shaping corporate financial strategy. Although several recent studies show that shareholder activism improves the performance of targeted firms, our understanding of the mechanisms through which activists enhance […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Mergers & Acquisitions | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Do Activists Turn Bad Bidders into Good Acquirers?

The Impact of Pending Tax Reform on Executive Compensation: The Need for Deductive Reasoning

Proposed US tax reform may impact the deductibility of executive compensation programs and companies should evaluate any potential tax planning opportunities in 2017 and the impact of the proposed changes going forward. The US House of Representatives and the Senate continue to work to reconcile the two versions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Executive Compensation, Legislative & Regulatory Developments, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Impact of Pending Tax Reform on Executive Compensation: The Need for Deductive Reasoning

Board Composition: A Slow Evolution

Interest in the composition of U.S. boards has never been greater. Pressure for change is coming from many fronts, particularly from institutional and activist investors. We have been tracking board composition issues for more than 30 years, and as the data from our 2017 Spencer Stuart Board Index show, U.S. boards are evolving, slowly. The […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Boards of Directors, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Board Composition: A Slow Evolution

SEC Cyber Unit and Allegedly Fraudulent ICO

On Monday, December 4, 2017, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) obtained an emergency order from a U.S. District Court in New York to enjoin an allegedly fraudulent initial coin offering scheme. The SEC’s complaint alleges that Dominic Lacroix, a recidivist securities law violator, and his company PlexCorps violated the anti-fraud and registration provisions […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on SEC Cyber Unit and Allegedly Fraudulent ICO

Advising Shareholders in Takeovers

The decision of shareholders of public firms to accept a takeover offer is typically marred by two problems. First, shareholders generally do not have a precise estimate of the fair value of their shares, and without more information they cannot distinguish between inadequate and attractive offers. Second, unless shareholders can coordinate their collective decision, there […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Mergers & Acquisitions | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Advising Shareholders in Takeovers

The Information Content of Dividends: Safer Profits, Not Higher Profits

Dividends represent one of the major financial decisions corporations make. Understanding both how capital markets evaluate dividends, and why firms pay dividends, are central to theories of asset pricing, portfolio allocation, capital structure, capital budgeting, cost of capital, and also to public economics, in particular regarding the effects of tax policy. Yet, despite extensive research, […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Accounting & Disclosure, Empirical Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Information Content of Dividends: Safer Profits, Not Higher Profits