Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation

BlackRock Talks … and U.S. Companies Must Listen

In BlackRock CEO and Co-founder Larry Fink’s annual letter to companies on January 16, he issued a call to action for companies to have “a clear sense of purpose.” To BlackRock, having “a clear sense of purpose” means much more than simply delivering quarterly financial results—companies will be expected to have a strong commitment to […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Corporate Social Responsibility, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on BlackRock Talks … and U.S. Companies Must Listen

High-Frequency Measures of Informed Trading and Corporate Announcements

While the activities of privately informed traders have been studied extensively, it remains a challenge to obtain empirical evidence on trading by informed investors because of the difficulty of determining when trades result from private information. In this article, we use comprehensive transactions datasets to analyze informed trading around three unscheduled corporate announcements (M&As, SEOs, […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Accounting & Disclosure, Empirical Research, Mergers & Acquisitions | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on High-Frequency Measures of Informed Trading and Corporate Announcements

Picking Friends Before Picking (Proxy) Fights: How Mutual Fund Voting Shapes Proxy Contests

Over the past two decades the frequency of proxy contests for board representation or control has increased as shareholder activism has become both an established investment strategy and an important form of corporate governance. Since dissidents are typically minority stockholders, a successful campaign, such as Trian Partners’ intervention at Procter and Gamble Co., requires support […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Empirical Research, Institutional Investors | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Picking Friends Before Picking (Proxy) Fights: How Mutual Fund Voting Shapes Proxy Contests

2017 Delaware Corporate Law Year in Review

In 2017, the Delaware courts once again issued many substantive corporate law decisions covering a wide range of issues critical to boards, stockholders, and officers. In addition, decisions from recent years continued to impact Delaware litigation, especially in the reduction of disclosure-based, settlement-driven M&A litigation as a result of the Court of Chancery’s Trulia decision. […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on 2017 Delaware Corporate Law Year in Review

CEO Tenure Rates

In the past five years, CEOs transitions have become more common than they had been in the preceding five years. As a result, median tenure has fallen a full year since 2013. According to a recent Equilar study, the median tenure for CEOs at large-cap (S&P 500) companies was 5.0 years at the end of […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on CEO Tenure Rates

Second Circuit’s Application of the Halliburton Doctrine

On January 12, 2018, the Second Circuit issued its second substantive opinion applying Halliburton Co. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc., 134 S. Ct. 2398 (2014) (“Halliburton II“), only the third issued by any federal circuit court since the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in June 2014. Ark. Teachers Ret. Sys. v. Goldman Sachs, — F.3d —, Case No. 16-250, 2018 […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Court Cases, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Second Circuit’s Application of the Halliburton Doctrine

FCPA Enforcement and Anti-Corruption Year in Review

Despite significant FCPA enforcement activity in 2017, the Trump administration’s approach to enforcement remains elusive and not readily characterized. Looking at 2017 as a whole, the number of corporate enforcement actions resolved by the DOJ and the SEC was within the range of fluctuations in such numbers in recent years, though down from 2016’s record-breaking […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on FCPA Enforcement and Anti-Corruption Year in Review

Second Circuit Decision on Fraud-on-the-Market

In Arkansas Teacher Retirement System v. Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., No. 16-250 (2d Cir. Jan. 12, 2018), the Second Circuit vacated the certification of a securities fraud class action due to two errors by the district court in its rejection of defendants’ rebuttal of the fraud-on-the-market presumption of reliance. First, the Second Circuit held that […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Second Circuit Decision on Fraud-on-the-Market

The Enduring Allure and Perennial Pitfalls of Earnouts

An “earnout” is a deal mechanism that provides for a buyer to pay additional consideration after the closing if specified post-closing performance targets are achieved by the acquired business or specified post-closing events occur. An earnout can be instrumental in bridging the gap when, based on divergent views by the buyer and the seller about […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on The Enduring Allure and Perennial Pitfalls of Earnouts

Regulating Public Offerings of Truly New Securities: First Principles

Much attention has been paid recently to fostering the ability of small and medium size enterprises (SMEs) to raise capital through offerings that lead to liquid trading of their shares. Liquidity makes the shares more valuable to prospective investors, who will therefore be willing to pay more for them. The traditional route to achieving such […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Accounting & Disclosure, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Regulating Public Offerings of Truly New Securities: First Principles