-
Supported By:
Subscribe or Follow
HLS Faculty & Senior Fellows
Program on Corporate Governance Advisory Board
- Peter Atkins
- David Bell
- Kerry E. Berchem
- Richard Brand
- Daniel Burch
- Paul Choi
- Jesse Cohn
- Arthur B. Crozier
- Renata J. Ferrari
- Andrew Freedman
- Ray Garcia
- Joseph Hall
- Jason M. Halper William P. Mills
- David Millstone
- Theodore Mirvis
- Philip Richter
- Elina Tetelbaum
- Sebastian Tiller
- Marc Trevino
- Steven J. Williams
Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation
Public Company Cybersecurity Disclosures
Yesterday [February 20, 2018], the Commission attempted to tackle an increasingly important issue: How should a public company tell its investors about its cybersecurity risks and incidents? Undeniably, the high-profile data losses and security breaches that have occurred across the public and private sectors show that no company or organization is immune from cyberattack. Unfortunately, […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Practitioner Publications, Regulators Materials, Securities Regulation, Speeches & Testimony
Tagged Cybersecurity, Disclosure, Public firms, Public interest, Risk disclosure, Risk management, Securities regulation
Comments Off on Public Company Cybersecurity Disclosures
The Supreme Court and the Scope of Whistleblowing Anti-retaliation Protections
Yesterday [February 21, 2018], SCOTUS handed down its decision in Digital Realty v. Somers, a case addressing the split in the circuits regarding the application of the Dodd-Frank whistleblower anti-retaliation protections: do the protections apply regardless of whether the whistleblower blows the whistle all the way to the SEC or just reports internally to the company? […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Court Cases, Legislative & Regulatory Developments, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement, Securities Regulation
Tagged Disclosure, Dodd-Frank Act, Exchange Act, Misconduct, Rule 21F-2, Sarbanes–Oxley Act, SEC, Securities regulation, Supreme Court, U.S. federal courts, Whistleblowers
Comments Off on The Supreme Court and the Scope of Whistleblowing Anti-retaliation Protections
Weekly Roundup: February 16–22, 2018
Effective Sexual Misconduct Risk Management Posted by Subodh Mishra, Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc., on Friday, February 16, 2018 Tags: Board composition, Board oversight, Boards of Directors, Corporate culture, Corporate Social Responsibility, Diversity, Executive Compensation, Incentives, Management, Misconduct, Risk management Perpetual Dual-Class Stock: The Case Against Corporate Royalty Posted by Robert J. Jackson, Jr., U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, on Friday, February 16, 2018 Tags: Dual-class stock, Firm performance, Firm valuation, IPOs, Listing standards, Management, Ownership, Proxy […]
Click here to read the complete postStatement on Cybersecurity Interpretive Guidance
Yesterday [Feb. 20, 2018], the Commission approved the issuance of an interpretive release to provide guidance to public companies when preparing disclosures about cybersecurity risks and incidents. The release also communicates the Commission’s views on the importance of maintaining comprehensive policies and procedures related to cybersecurity risks and incidents. In today’s environment, cybersecurity is critical to […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Regulators Materials, Securities Regulation, Speeches & Testimony
Tagged Cybersecurity, Disclosure, Public firms, Public interest, Risk, Risk disclosure, Risk management, Securities regulation
Comments Off on Statement on Cybersecurity Interpretive Guidance
Why Dual-Class Stock: A Brief Response to Commissioners Jackson and Stein
Two SEC Commissioners—Robert Jackson and Kara Stein—separately visited Silicon Valley last week, and both used the opportunity to sharply criticize the practice among some companies—most notably but not exclusively technology companies—to adopt so-called “perpetual” dual-class stock. In typical dual-class structures, one group of stockholders (typically the founders and other insiders) receive stock with multiple votes […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation
Tagged Boards of Directors, Capital markets, Dual-class stock, Equity capital, Institutional Investors, IPOs, Ownership, Public interest, SEC, Securities regulation, Shareholder rights, Shareholder voting
Comments Off on Why Dual-Class Stock: A Brief Response to Commissioners Jackson and Stein
The SEC and Mandatory Shareholder Arbitration
Depending on your point of view, you may have experienced either heart palpitations or increased serotonin levels when you heard, back in July 2017, that SEC Commissioner Michael Piwowar had, in a speech before the Heritage Foundation, advised that the SEC was open to the idea of allowing companies contemplating IPOs to include mandatory shareholder […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement, Securities Regulation
Tagged Arbitration, Capital formation, Charter & bylaws, Class actions, Equity offerings, Exchange Act, IPOs, Rule 10b-5, SEC, Securities litigation, Securities regulation, Shareholder proposals, Shareholder voting
Comments Off on The SEC and Mandatory Shareholder Arbitration
Delaware Court Ruling on Trading Price and Fair Value Appraisal
On February 15, 2018, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued its post-trial decision in Verition Partners Master Fund Ltd. v. Aruba Networks, Inc., a statutory appraisal proceeding arising from Hewlett-Packard’s 2015 acquisition of Aruba Networks. The court concluded that the “most persuasive evidence” of Aruba Networks’ fair value was its 30-day average unaffected market price of $17.13 per […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Court Cases, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Accounting, Acquisition agreements, Acquisition premiums, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Fair values, Firm valuation, In re Appraisal of Dell, In re Appraisal of DFC Global, Market efficiency, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Shareholder suits
Comments Off on Delaware Court Ruling on Trading Price and Fair Value Appraisal
SEC Year-in-Review and a Look Ahead
2017 brought marked challenges to the SEC’s ability to aggressively enforce the securities laws, including the Supreme Court limiting the SEC’s ability to seek disgorgement and court action endangering the validity of its oft-used administrative proceedings. 2017 also saw a decrease in the SEC’s total enforcement statistics. However, there is reason to believe that 2018 will […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Practitioner Publications, Private Equity, Securities Litigation & Enforcement, Securities Regulation
Tagged Cybersecurity, Disgorgement, DOJ, Financial technology, ICOs, Insider trading, Private equity, SEC, SEC enforcement, Securities regulation, Supreme Court
Comments Off on SEC Year-in-Review and a Look Ahead
Eclipse of the Public Corporation or Eclipse of the Public Markets?
In 1989, Jensen wrote that “the publicly held corporation has outlived its usefulness in many sectors of the economy.” He published in the Harvard Business Review an article titled “The Eclipse of the Public Corporation.” Jensen argued that the conflict between owners and managers can make the public corporation an inefficient form of organization. He […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Accounting & Disclosure, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Empirical Research, Private Equity
Tagged Capital formation, Capital markets, Disclosure, Equity capital, Firm valuation, GAAP, IPOs, Payouts, Private equity, Private firms, Public firms, R&D, Repurchases
Comments Off on Eclipse of the Public Corporation or Eclipse of the Public Markets?
Current Developments in California Shareholder Litigation
The dominant features in the shareholder litigation environment in California today are fragmentation and uncertainty: Plaintiffs’ bar fragmentation means ‘too small to sue’ no longer applies Uncertainty as to whether IPO lawsuits can be brought in state court or only Federal Uncertainty in the evolution of merger and fiduciary duty suits Uncertainty as to the […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement
Tagged California, IPOs, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Private firms, Risk, Section 11, Securities litigation, Shareholder suits, Small firms, State law
Comments Off on Current Developments in California Shareholder Litigation