Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation

Unequal Voting and the Business Judgment Rule

Increasingly, company founders have been opting to shore up control by creating voting structures that undercut shareholder voting power, where only a decade ago almost all chose the standard and accepted one-share, one-vote structure. Now the Snap Inc. initial public offering has gone even further with the first-ever non-voting stock model. By offering stock in […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Unequal Voting and the Business Judgment Rule

In the Spirit of Full Cybersecurity Disclosure

On February 21, 2018, the SEC issued interpretive guidance (the “release”) in response to the pervasive increase in digital technology as well as the severity and frequency of cybersecurity threats and incidents. The release largely refreshes existing SEC staff guidance related to cybersecurity and, like that guidance, does not establish any new disclosure obligations but […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Boards of Directors, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on In the Spirit of Full Cybersecurity Disclosure

Activist Arbitrage in M&A Acquirers

In our paper, Activist Arbitrage in M&A Acquirers, we study a relatively new activist investor strategy in which investors adopt a non-conventional risk arbitrage strategy in the acquirer firms of announced M&A deals. Recall that, in a conventional risk arbitrage, an investor takes a long position in the target after an M&A deal is announced, […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Corporate Elections & Voting, Institutional Investors, Mergers & Acquisitions | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Activist Arbitrage in M&A Acquirers

Weekly Roundup: March 30–April 5, 2018

What is the Impact of Successful Cyberattacks on Target Firms? Posted by René M. Stulz (Ohio State University), on Friday, March 30, 2018 Tags: Board oversight, Cash flows, Cybersecurity, Equity-based compensation, Executive Compensation, Firm valuation, Leverage, Market reaction, Privacy, Public firms, Risk management, Risk-taking, Shareholder value, Target firms An Early Look at the State of U.S. CEO Pay Posted by John Roe, ISS Analytics, on Friday, March 30, 2018 Tags: Compensation disclosure, Compensation […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Weekly Roundup | Tagged | Comments Off on Weekly Roundup: March 30–April 5, 2018

The Maturing Market for Representation and Warranty Insurance

Representation and warranty insurance for corporate transactions has existed for approximately two decades. R&W insurance, as the name suggests, provides coverage for breaches of representations and warranties regarding the business acquired that were not known to the buyer at the time of the purchase. While R&W insurance was viewed historically as a product of limited […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Maturing Market for Representation and Warranty Insurance

Texas Gulf Sulphur and the Genesis of Corporate Liability Under Rule 10b-5

Corporate liability for market misrepresentations under Rule 10b-5, the staple of today’s class actions, first took root in the 1960s. Our paper, Texas Gulf Sulphur and the Genesis of Corporate Liability under Rule 10b-5, shows the initial judicial efforts, occurring in the iconic Texas Gulf Sulphur case, to grapple with the extensive corporate liability for […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Court Cases, Securities Litigation & Enforcement, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Texas Gulf Sulphur and the Genesis of Corporate Liability Under Rule 10b-5

Keynote Address of Commissioner Brian Quintenz before the DC Blockchain Summit

Good afternoon and thank you for that very kind introduction. As an alumnus, I’m always happy to be back at the McDonough School of Business. It’s great to be with you here at the DC Blockchain Summit. I want to congratulate Perianne and the Chamber of Digital Commerce on hosting such a fascinating event with […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Derivatives, Financial Regulation, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation, Speeches & Testimony | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Keynote Address of Commissioner Brian Quintenz before the DC Blockchain Summit

How Board Skills Vary by Director Age Groups

Members of public company boards of directors range in age from early 20s to well over 75. It is true that most directors are closer to retirement age—the median age for a director at Equilar 500 companies was 62.7 in 2017—and board members over 60 are more prevalent overall than their more youthful contemporaries. There are signs […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on How Board Skills Vary by Director Age Groups

Has Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Discouraged Corporate Investment? New Evidence from a Natural Experiment

The US Congress’s passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) in 2002 following a string of high-profile corporate scandals resulted in the most significant change in securities regulation since the Securities Act of 1933. One of the most important components of SOX is Section 404 (SOX404), which is arguably the most contentious and onerous section of […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Accounting & Disclosure, Empirical Research, International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Securities Litigation & Enforcement, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Has Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Discouraged Corporate Investment? New Evidence from a Natural Experiment

2018 Proxy Season: Early Trends in Pay Ratio Disclosure

Beginning with fiscal years ending on or after December 31, 2017, companies are required to disclose the ratio that compares the compensation of the CEO to the compensation of the median employee (pay ratio). This disclosure was part of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act signed into law in 2010. Compensation Advisory […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Executive Compensation, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on 2018 Proxy Season: Early Trends in Pay Ratio Disclosure