-
Supported By:

Subscribe or Follow
Program on Corporate Governance Advisory Board
- Peter Atkins
- David Bell
- Kerry E. Berchem
- Richard Brand
- Daniel Burch
- Paul Choi
- Jesse Cohn
- Arthur B. Crozier Christine Davine
- Renata J. Ferrari
- Andrew Freedman
- Ray Garcia
- Byron Georgiou
- Joseph Hall
- Jason M. Halper William P. Mills
- David Millstone
- Theodore Mirvis
- Philip Richter
- Elina Tetelbaum
- Sebastian Tiller
- Marc Trevino Jonathan Watkins
- Steven J. Williams
HLS Faculty & Senior Fellows
Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation
Portfolio Manager Compensation in the U.S. Mutual Fund Industry
According to the Investment Company Institute, about half of all households in the United States invest in mutual funds, and the assets managed by them totaled more than $16 trillion at year-end 2016. Given the importance of mutual funds in the economy, understanding fund managers’ incentives is a key issue for academics, regulators, practitioners, and […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Accounting & Disclosure, Banking & Financial Institutions, Empirical Research, Financial Regulation
Tagged Agency costs, Asset management, Compensation regulation, Contracts, Financial institutions, Financial regulation, Fund managers, Fund performance, Incentives, Mutual funds, Ownership structure, Profitability, Securities regulation
Comments Off on Portfolio Manager Compensation in the U.S. Mutual Fund Industry
Dodd-Frank is a Pigouvian Regulation
In this Note, recently published in the Yale Law Journal, we show that Dodd Frank’s compliance costs have furthered the Act’s goal of reducing systemic risk. Specifically, our article analyzes the all of the spinoffs and divestitures that have occurred at eleven systemically important financial institutions (SIFIs) since Dodd-Frank went into effect in 2010 and […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Banking & Financial Institutions, Empirical Research, Financial Regulation
Tagged Capital requirements, Compliance and disclosure interpretation, Divestitures, Dodd-Frank Act, Financial institutions, Financial regulation, Incentives, Risk, Risk management, SIFIs, Spinoffs, Systemic risk
Comments Off on Dodd-Frank is a Pigouvian Regulation
2018 Proposed Amendments to the Delaware General Corporation Law
Legislation proposing to amend the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “General Corporation Law”) has been released by the Corporate Council of the Corporation Law Section of the Delaware State Bar Association and, if approved by the Corporation Law Section, is expected to be introduced to the Delaware General Assembly. If enacted, […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Corporate Elections & Voting, Court Cases, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Appraisal rights, Charter & bylaws, Delaware law, DGCL, DGCL Section 102, DGCL Section 204, DGCL Section 205, DGCL Section 262, Mergers & acquisitions, Shareholder voting, State law
Comments Off on 2018 Proposed Amendments to the Delaware General Corporation Law
Weekly Roundup: April 6–12, 2018
Activist Arbitrage in M&A Acquirers Posted by Wei Jiang (Columbia University), Tao Li (University of Florida), and Danqing Mei (Columbia University), on Friday, April 6, 2018 Tags: Activist arbitrageurs, Arbitrage, Institutional Investors, Mergers & acquisitions, Proxy advisors, Risk arbitrage, Shareholder activism, Shareholder voting In the Spirit of Full Cybersecurity Disclosure Posted by Christine Mazor and Sandra Herrygers, Deloitte & Touche LLP, on Friday, April 6, 2018 Tags: Boards […]
Click here to read the complete postHow Investors Can (and Can’t) Create Social Value
Most investors have a single goal: to earn the highest financial return. These socially-neutral investors maximize their risk-adjusted returns and would not accept a lower financial return from an investment that also produced social benefits. An increasing number of socially-motivated investors have goals beyond maximizing profits. Some seek to align their investments with their social […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Corporate Social Responsibility, Institutional Investors
Tagged Asset management, Corporate Social Responsibility, ESG, Institutional Investors, Reputation, Shareholder value, Social contract
Comments Off on How Investors Can (and Can’t) Create Social Value
Does Tax Deductibility Affect CEO Pay? The Case of the Health Insurance Industry
The ratio of CEO pay to that of ordinary workers has exploded over the last four decades, going from less than 30-to-1 in the 1970s to more than 200-to-1 by 2000 and in most subsequent years (Mishel and Schieder 2017). There is an ongoing debate about the causes of this increase in CEO compensation. Many […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Empirical Research, Executive Compensation, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation
Tagged Agency costs, Executive Compensation, Firm performance, Management, Pay for performance, Performance measures, Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, Taxation
Comments Off on Does Tax Deductibility Affect CEO Pay? The Case of the Health Insurance Industry
The Purpose of the Corporation
Whether the purpose of the corporation is to generate profits for its shareholders or to operate in the interests of all of its stakeholders has been actively debated since 1932, when it was the subject of dueling law review articles by Columbia law professor Adolf Berle (shareholders) and Harvard law professor Merrick Dodd (stakeholders). Following […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Corporate Social Responsibility, Institutional Investors, International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Corporate Social Responsibility, Environmental disclosure, ESG, Europe, Institutional Investors, International governance, Long-Term value, Shareholder primacy, Transparency
Comments Off on The Purpose of the Corporation
The Information Value of Corporate Social Responsibility
A significant portion of the U.S. corporate expense budget is allocated to corporate social responsibility (CSR) spending. Given its importance, there has been a long-standing debate on its desirability from shareholders’ perspective. Several studies posit that CSR creates shareholder value through maximizing stakeholder value, a result known as “doing well by doing good” (Edmans, 2011; […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Boards of Directors, Corporate Social Responsibility, Empirical Research
Tagged Board independence, Board monitoring, Boards of Directors, Corporate Social Responsibility, Decision-making, Executive turnover, Information asymmetries, Information environment, Management, Stakeholders
Comments Off on The Information Value of Corporate Social Responsibility
10 Tips for Upcoming Annual Shareholder Meetings
With spring beginning, many public companies are getting ready for their annual shareholder meetings. Here are some tips to consider as part of the planning process. Meeting Logistics. Check and double-check meeting logistics. While this may sound basic, it is important to confirm and reconfirm the venue, in addition to all meeting participants and service […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Boards of Directors, Engagement, Institutional Investors, Rule 14a-8, Shareholder meetings, Shareholder proposals, Shareholder voting
Comments Off on 10 Tips for Upcoming Annual Shareholder Meetings
Review and Analysis of 2017 U.S. Shareholder Activism
Shareholder activist hedge funds grew modestly in 2017, not yet restoring global activist fund assets under management (“AUM”) to 2015 highs. Moreover, the rate of formation of new activist funds continued to decline, and the “winners” in this environment—those activists attracting the most new capital—seemed to be the well-established activists with strong brand names and […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Institutional Investors, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications
Tagged BlackRock, Boards of Directors, Corporate Social Responsibility, ESG, Institutional Investors, Institutional voting, Mutual funds, Shareholder activism, Vanguard
Comments Off on Review and Analysis of 2017 U.S. Shareholder Activism