-
Supported By:
Subscribe or Follow
Program on Corporate Governance Advisory Board
- Peter Atkins
- David Bell
- Kerry E. Berchem
- Richard Brand
- Daniel Burch
- Paul Choi
- Jesse Cohn
- Arthur B. Crozier Christine Davine
- Renata J. Ferrari
- Andrew Freedman
- Ray Garcia
- Byron Georgiou
- Joseph Hall
- Jason M. Halper William P. Mills
- David Millstone
- Theodore Mirvis
- Philip Richter
- Elina Tetelbaum
- Sebastian Tiller
- Marc Trevino Jonathan Watkins
- Steven J. Williams
HLS Faculty & Senior Fellows
Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation
Independent Directors: New Class of 2017
Companies are continuing to bring fresh and diverse perspectives into the boardroom and to enhance alignment of board composition with their forward-looking strategies. In our second annual report, we share the results of our analysis of independent directors who were elected by shareholders to the board of a Fortune 100 company for the first time […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Boards of Directors, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Board composition, Board independence, Board tenure, Boards of Directors, Director qualifications, Director tenure, Disclosure, Diversity
Comments Off on Independent Directors: New Class of 2017
Compensation Committee Outlook: Staying Nimble in 2018
Pearl Meyer offers its annual Top Five issues for compensation committees. Boards are considering the impact and reacting to the changes brought about by tax reform, diminishing regulation, shifts in political and cultural norms, and an ongoing acceleration of change in business environments. Individually and collectively these factors are demanding that boards be alert and […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Boards of Directors, Executive Compensation, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Boards of Directors, Clawbacks, Compensation committees, Compensation guidelines, Compensation ratios, ESG, Executive Compensation, Incentives, Pay for performance, Section 162(m), Taxation, Tech companies
Comments Off on Compensation Committee Outlook: Staying Nimble in 2018
SEC Rules and Guidance for Investment Advisers Standard of Conduct
On April 18, 2018, following a two-hour open meeting, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) voted 4-1 to issue the Standards of Conduct for Investment Professionals Rulemaking Package, which is roughly 1,000 pages long and comprises three releases, one of which is a proposed interpretation and two of which are proposed rules regarding […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation
Tagged Broker-dealers, Conflicts of interest, Disclosure, Duty of care, Fiduciary duties, Investment advisers, Investment Advisers Act, Investor protection, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities regulation
Comments Off on SEC Rules and Guidance for Investment Advisers Standard of Conduct
The Investor Stewardship Group’s Governance Principles
In this post, we provide an overview of the Investor Stewardship Group (the “ISG”) Governance Principles and steps for public companies to consider when evaluating how the principles may be incorporated into their own disclosure and engagement priorities. The ISG’s website, including a link to the ISG Governance Principles, is available here. In January 2017, […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Corporate Social Responsibility, Institutional Investors, International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Accountability, Board communication, Boards of Directors, Corporate Social Responsibility, Director qualifications, Diversity, Engagement, ESG, Europe, Institutional Investors, International governance, Long-Term value, Management, Shareholder rights, Shareholder voting, Stewardship, UK
Comments Off on The Investor Stewardship Group’s Governance Principles
Rethinking Successor Criminal Liability, for the First Time
It’s axiomatic that the criminal justice system should punish corporations that commit crimes and not punish those that don’t. But when a criminal corporation reorganizes—whether by merging with others or spinning off lines of business—how can we tell which, if any, of the successors “committed” the predecessor’s crime? A lot turns on this question. Whether, […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Mergers & Acquisitions
Tagged Compliance and disclosure interpretation, Corporate crime, Corporate liability, Incentives, Liability standards, Management, Mergers & acquisitions, Misconduct, Public enforcement, Spinoffs, Succession
Comments Off on Rethinking Successor Criminal Liability, for the First Time
Weekly Roundup: May 4-10, 2018
Corporate Purpose: ESG, CSR, PRI and Sustainable Long-Term Investment Posted by Martin Lipton, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Friday, May 4, 2018 Tags: Accountability, Boards of Directors, Corporate Social Responsibility, DOL, ERISA, ESG, International governance, Long-Term value, Risk oversight, Stewardship, Sustainability The Evolving Market for Retail Investment Services and Forward-Looking Regulation Adding Clarity and Investor Protection while Ensuring Access and Choice Posted by Jay Clayton, U.S. […]
Click here to read the complete postBeaches and Bitcoin: Remarks before the Medici Conference
Thank you, Vince [Molinari], for that kind introduction. I appreciate the opportunity to be here today. I must start with the standard disclaimer that my comments today reflect my own opinions and not necessarily those of the Commission or my fellow Commissioners. Back in Washington, DC, there has been a lot of talk about regulatory […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Practitioner Publications, Regulators Materials, Securities Litigation & Enforcement, Securities Regulation, Speeches & Testimony
Tagged Bitcoin, Blockchain, Cryptocurrency, Financial technology, ICOs, Investor protection, Securities enforcement, Securities regulation
Comments Off on Beaches and Bitcoin: Remarks before the Medici Conference
Netflix Approach to Governance: Genuine Transparency with the Board
We recently published a paper on SSRN, Netflix Approach to Governance: Genuine Transparency with the Board, that explains the unique and innovative board practices of Netflix. The hallmark of good corporate governance is an independent-minded board of directors to oversee management and represent the interests of shareholders. Its primary responsibilities are to hire and replace […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Boards of Directors, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation
Tagged Accountability, Board independence, Board oversight, Board performance, Boards of Directors, Corporate culture, Information asymmetries, Information environment, Netflix, Transparency
Comments Off on Netflix Approach to Governance: Genuine Transparency with the Board
An Investor Consensus on U.S. Corporate Governance & Stewardship Practices
The ISG, as a private initiative wholly independent of any regulatory body, was formed to bring together all types of investors to establish a framework of fundamental standards of investment stewardship and corporate governance for U.S. institutional investor and boardroom conduct. The Investor Stewardship Group (ISG) is a collective of some of the largest institutional […]
Click here to read the complete post