Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation

Response to U.S. Senate Banking Committee

June 1, 2018 The Honorable Dean Heller Chairman Subcommittee on Securities, Insurance & Investment Senate Committee on Banking 324 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 Dear Chairman Heller, We received the letter dated May 9, 2018 regarding your review of the proxy advisory industry and the business practices of proxy advisory firms. We appreciate […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Corporate Elections & Voting, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Response to U.S. Senate Banking Committee

The Federalization of Corporate Governance

In my recently published book, The Federalization of Corporate Governance (Oxford University Press 2018) (ISBN 978-0-19-993454-6), I explore this process of federalization in the United States from 1903 to the present. Clearly, the states, particularly Delaware, traditionally have been and continue as principal regulators of the sphere of corporate governance. Nonetheless, to an increasing degree, the […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Boards of Directors, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Corporate Elections & Voting, Mergers & Acquisitions, Securities Litigation & Enforcement, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Federalization of Corporate Governance

Clarifying Appraisal Rights in Complicated Transactions

In City of North Miami Beach Genl. Employees’ Retirement Plan v. Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. (June 1, 2018), the Court of Chancery held that appraisal rights are not available to the stockholders of Dr Pepper in connection with a transaction structure (involving a reverse triangular merger and a special cash dividend to the target […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Clarifying Appraisal Rights in Complicated Transactions

Update on The New Paradigm: The Evolution of Stewardship Principles

When The New Paradigm (which we prepared for the World Economic Forum) and similar corporate governance frameworks were published in 2016-17, there was a broad consensus among business leaders and investors on the critical need to restore a long-term perspective. Pervasive and acute pressures for near-term financial results have been discouraging R&D, capex, employee training […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Update on The New Paradigm: The Evolution of Stewardship Principles

George Stigler on His Head: The Consequences of Restrictions on Competition in (Bank) Regulation

Like many pieces of financial legislation, the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010 was passed in the aftermath of a major financial crisis. Such crises have been a recurring feature of U.S. economic and political history since at least the nineteenth century. Nevertheless, it is only their aftermath, when the embers of the financial system are still […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Banking & Financial Institutions, Empirical Research, Financial Crisis, Financial Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on George Stigler on His Head: The Consequences of Restrictions on Competition in (Bank) Regulation

Sandbagging in Delaware

In the private M&A context, “sandbagging” refers to a buyer, who despite having knowledge of a breach of representation or warranty by a seller at some time before closing, proceeds with the closing and then seeks indemnification from the seller for the breach of representation or warranty of which it had prior knowledge. The popular […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Sandbagging in Delaware

Observations on Culture at Financial Institutions and the SEC

Thank you Bill [Dudley] for that kind introduction and for inviting me to speak today [June 18,2018]. I’m planning to speak for fifteen or so minutes and to open the floor to questions. I want to extend my congratulations to Bill Dudley on a very successful term. You are now a member of the long […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Banking & Financial Institutions, Financial Regulation, Practitioner Publications, Regulators Materials, Securities Regulation, Speeches & Testimony | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Observations on Culture at Financial Institutions and the SEC

Audit Tenure and the Timeliness of Misstatement Discovery

Is long auditor tenure beneficial or detrimental for audit quality? This is the question we are trying to address in this article. The impact of audit firm tenure and auditor rotation on audit quality have long been debated both within academia and by regulators in the US and globally. The debate has centered on two […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Accounting & Disclosure, Empirical Research | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Audit Tenure and the Timeliness of Misstatement Discovery

Understanding the Dutch Poison Pill

Ahold Delhaize, the biggest food retail group in the Benelux region with a rough market cap of €25 billion, is facing pushback from shareholders over a unique Dutch practice. The company recently announced that it had extended its call option agreement with a foundation called “Stichting Continuïteit Ahold Delhaize” or “SCAD” (roughly translated as the […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Institutional Investors, International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Understanding the Dutch Poison Pill

The Effect of Enforcement Transparency: Evidence from SEC Comment-Letter Reviews

Regulators increasingly rely on policies to disseminate their oversight actions, with the assertion that the disclosure of regulatory oversight activities can enhance the effect of enforcement by increasing third-party monitoring. However, the validity of this assertion has rarely been tested. In this study, we examine the effect of the public disclosure of the Securities and […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Accounting & Disclosure, Securities Litigation & Enforcement, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Effect of Enforcement Transparency: Evidence from SEC Comment-Letter Reviews