Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation

JOBS Act 3.0

On July 17, 2018, the U.S. House of Representatives overwhelmingly passed, by a vote of 406-4, bipartisan financial reform legislation titled the “JOBS and Investor Confidence Act of 2018,” frequently referred to as JOBS Act 3.0. The JOBS Act 3.0 builds upon the 2012 Jumpstart Our Business Startups (“JOBS”) Act, and on the Fixing America’s […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Legislative & Regulatory Developments, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on JOBS Act 3.0

The Rise and Fall (?) of the Berle-Means Corporation

A description of a separation of ownership and control in America’s largest companies was the best-known feature of Adolf Berle and Gardiner Means’ renowned 1932 book The Modern Corporation and Private Property. Diffuse share ownership and the managerial autonomy which tends to follow on from it would become hallmarks of American corporate governance. Explaining why […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Boards of Directors, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Institutional Investors | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Rise and Fall (?) of the Berle-Means Corporation

Structuring Discretion for Clawbacks

The continuing stream of corporate wrongdoing and risk failures—at Wells Fargo & Co., Volkswagen AG, Equifax, Uber Technologies, Mylan, and others—gives new urgency to two questions: Should boards have broader policies for triggering compensation adjustments, forfeitures, and repayment of past compensation—generally referred to as recoupments or clawbacks—when corporate harm is demonstrated? How should boards exercise […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Executive Compensation, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Structuring Discretion for Clawbacks

Recent Developments Relating to Corporate Governance

Despite a political agenda packed with important issues like tariffs, immigration and a Supreme Court nomination, there have been a number of recent federal and state legislative developments relating to public company corporate governance topics that are of interest. In particular, the Senate Banking Committee has recently considered bills relating to the role of proxy […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Recent Developments Relating to Corporate Governance

Private Equity Liability Under European Law

On July 12, 2018, the General Court of the European Union dismissed Goldman Sachs’s appeal of a decision finding it jointly and severally liable for the cartel conduct of a portfolio company held by funds controlled by Goldman Sachs. The General Court confirmed that the presumption that a parent company “exercises decisive influence” over a […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications, Private Equity | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Private Equity Liability Under European Law

The Regulation of Proxy Advisors

Recently, the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs held a hearing on various legislative proposals aimed at improving corporate governance, including the Corporate Governance Reform and Transparency Act, H.R. 4015, that would regulate the activities of proxy advisory firms like Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) and Glass Lewis. This hearing is the latest step in […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Corporate Elections & Voting, Institutional Investors, Legislative & Regulatory Developments, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

SEC Liability for Social Media Violations

On July 10, 2018, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) reaffirmed the application of the securities laws to social media use. Specifically, the SEC published five settlement orders (the “Settlements”) arising from alleged violations of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (“Advisers Act”), and Rule 206(4)-1(a)(1) thereunder (the “Testimonial Rule”). Notably, the […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on SEC Liability for Social Media Violations

Weekly Roundup: July 27-August 2

IPO Governance Survey 2018 Posted by Michael Kaplan, Joseph Hall and Sophia Hudson, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, on Friday, July 27, 2018 Tags: Boards of Directors, Capital formation, Controlling shareholders, Dual-class stock, IPOs, Listing standards, Securities regulation, Shareholder voting, Small firms Gender Diversity and Board Quotas Posted by David A. Katz and Laura A. McIntosh, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Friday, July 27, 2018 […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Weekly Roundup | Tagged | Comments Off on Weekly Roundup: July 27-August 2

Shareholder Proposal Developments During the 2018 Proxy Season

As discussed in further detail below, based on the results of the 2018 proxy season, there are several key takeaways to consider for the coming year: Shareholder proposals continue to be used by certain shareholders and to demand significant time and attention. Although the overall number of shareholder proposals submitted decreased 5% to 788, the […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Shareholder Proposal Developments During the 2018 Proxy Season

Partial Disclosures and the Corwin Doctrine

On July 9, 2018, the Delaware Supreme Court held in Morrison v. Berry that Corwin business judgment review will not apply to stockholder-approved transactions when “partial and elliptical” disclosures leave stockholders less than fully informed. This decision, which reversed a dismissal by the Court of Chancery, serves as a court-described “cautionary reminder” that disclosures to […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Court Cases, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Partial Disclosures and the Corwin Doctrine