Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation

Information Rights of Conflicted Directors

The Delaware Court of Chancery recently addressed important issues concerning the information rights of directors designated by a significant stockholder, as well as a board committee’s ability to withhold information from certain directors. These types of issues frequently arise in practice when there are competing factions of directors or other types of governance disputes within […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Boards of Directors, Court Cases, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Information Rights of Conflicted Directors

Review of Shareholder Activism: 1H 2018

Key Observations on the Activist Environment in 1H 2018 1. New campaigns initiated and capital deployed by activists reached record levels in 1H 2018 1Q 2018 and 2Q 2018 were the two most active quarters ever, resulting in a record 145 new campaigns launched against 136 companies in 1H 2018 Elliott’s 17 new campaigns in […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Review of Shareholder Activism: 1H 2018

Lorenzo v. SEC: Will the Supreme Court Further Curtail Rule 10b-5?

Last month, the Supreme Court granted a writ of certiorari in Lorenzo v. SEC, a case where Francis Lorenzo, a registered representative of a broker-dealer, allegedly emailed false and misleading statements to investors that were originally drafted by his boss. After administrative and Commission findings of liability, a divided panel of the D.C. Circuit determined that, […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Banking & Financial Institutions, Court Cases, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

The Limits of “The Corwin Effect”

In Morrison v. Berry, the Delaware Supreme Court reversed the Court of Chancery’s dismissal of M&A litigation under Corwin v. KKR Financial Holdings LLC. As in Appel v. Berkman, the Supreme Court held that Corwin did not apply because of the target’s failure to disclose all material facts to stockholders. The decision reiterates that Delaware […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Court Cases, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Limits of “The Corwin Effect”

Effects of Executive Pay Levels on Say on Pay

CEO pay gets most of the attention for the Say on Pay vote. It’s less clear how shareholders interpret and evaluate pay levels for the other named executive officers excluding the CEO (“NEOs”) and to what degree these values impact Say on Pay outcomes. We looked at S&P 500 Say on Pay results from the […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Corporate Elections & Voting, Executive Compensation, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Effects of Executive Pay Levels on Say on Pay

Proposed Amendments to Whistleblower Rules

In 2011, pursuant to authority granted under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC or Commission) adopted rules implementing the whistleblower provisions of Section 21F of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Whistleblower Program). The Whistleblower Program allows the Commission to provide monetary rewards to whistleblowers […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Proposed Amendments to Whistleblower Rules

Gender Diversity and Board Quotas

California has made headlines this summer with legislative action toward instituting gender quotas for boards of directors of public companies headquartered in the state. The legislation has passed the state senate; to be enacted, it must be passed by the California state assembly and signed by the governor. In 2013, California became the first state […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Legislative & Regulatory Developments, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Gender Diversity and Board Quotas

IPO Governance Survey 2018

An initial public offering is a key inflection point for a company, not least because it often triggers the opportunity to review and replace the company’s corporate governance structure. In place of complex contractual shareholder arrangements that are subject only to the constraints of corporate law, upon an IPO, a company adopts a more simplified governance structure that […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on IPO Governance Survey 2018

Weekly Roundup: July 20-26, 2018

Awaiting Supreme Court Clarification on Fraudulent Scheme Claims Posted by Daphne Morduchowitz, Vincent A. Sama and Veronica E. Callahan, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, on Friday, July 20, 2018 Tags: Janus Capital v. Traders, Liability standards, Rule 10b-5, SEC enforcement, Securities enforcement, Securities fraud, Securities litigation, Shareholder suits, Supreme Court The Board’s Role in Corporate Social Purpose Posted by Amy Silverstein, Debbie McCormack, and […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Weekly Roundup | Tagged | Comments Off on Weekly Roundup: July 20-26, 2018

Analysis and Recommendations on Shareholder Proposal Decision-Making under the SEC No-Action Process

The shareholder proposal process, administered by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under Rule 14a-8, is a pillar of modern corporate governance. The Shareholder Rights Group is a coalition of investors protecting shareholders’ rights to engage with public companies through shareholder proposals. Our analysis submitted to the SEC on July 2, 2018 concludes that certain […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Analysis and Recommendations on Shareholder Proposal Decision-Making under the SEC No-Action Process