-
Supported By:


Subscribe or Follow
HLS Faculty & Senior Fellows
Program on Corporate Governance Advisory Board
- Peter Atkins
- David Bell
- Kerry E. Berchem
- Richard Brand
- Daniel Burch
- Paul Choi
- Jesse Cohn
- Arthur B. Crozier
- Renata J. Ferrari
- Andrew Freedman
- Ray Garcia
- Joseph Hall
- Jason M. Halper William P. Mills
- David Millstone
- Theodore Mirvis
- Philip Richter
- Elina Tetelbaum
- Sebastian Tiller
- Marc Trevino
- Steven J. Williams
Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation
SEC No-Action Letters on Investment Adviser Responsibilities in Voting Client Proxies and Use of Proxy Voting Firms
As reported in our prior Client Alert, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued a statement in July announcing that it will host a roundtable regarding the U.S. proxy process. The roundtable, expected to be held in November, will give the SEC an opportunity to discuss with market participants various topics, including the hotly debated role […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation
Tagged Boards of Directors, Conflicts of interest, Institutional Investors, Investment advisers, ISS, No-action letters, Proxy advisors, Proxy voting, SEC, Securities regulation, Shareholder voting
Comments Off on SEC No-Action Letters on Investment Adviser Responsibilities in Voting Client Proxies and Use of Proxy Voting Firms
Study of the German Corporate Governance Code Compliance
Scope of the Study The aim of the study is to analyze the compliance behavior of the largest listed German firms with the German Corporate Governance Code in 2017 (subsequently the “Code”). The Code was introduced in February 2002 and provides three types of provisions that encompass the German governance environment:
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Accounting & Disclosure, Boards of Directors, International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Securities Regulation
Tagged AktG, Board monitoring, Boards of Directors, Compliance & ethics, Germany, Incentives, International governance, Ownership structure, Reporting regulation, Securities regulation, Surveys, Transparency
Comments Off on Study of the German Corporate Governance Code Compliance
SEC Ratification for Defective Administrative Proceedings
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “Commission”) has issued an order clearing the way for cases to proceed before its own administrative law judges (“ALJs”), notwithstanding a Supreme Court decision issued earlier this year that declared the SEC’s prior appointment of ALJs to be unconstitutional. Respondents in nearly 200 SEC proceedings with pending cases […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement, Securities Regulation
Tagged ALJs, SEC, Securities enforcement, Securities regulation, Supreme Court
Comments Off on SEC Ratification for Defective Administrative Proceedings
Corporate Governance Oversight and Proxy Advisory Firms
The Securities and Exchange Commission requires that investment management funds submit proxy votes for all companies in which they own shares. Because of the vast number of stocks held by the typical institutional investor, hedge fund, or mutual fund, most of these investors draw on the research of a proxy advisory firm, which provides them […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Corporate Elections & Voting, Financial Regulation, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation
Tagged Agency costs, Conflicts of interest, Dodd-Frank Act, Financial regulation, Glass Lewis, Institutional Investors, ISS, Proxy advisors, Proxy voting, Retail investors, Shareholder activism, Shareholder proposals, Transparency
Comments Off on Corporate Governance Oversight and Proxy Advisory Firms
Corporate Law Should Embrace Putting Workers On Boards: The Evidence Is Behind Them
When the Dean of Harvard Law, Robert Clark, wrote his classic text on Corporate Law in 1986, he said that if you only wanted to grasp the basics, “you must, at the very least, also gain a working knowledge of labor law.” That neglected truth might become much more significant soon, because a growing number […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Boards of Directors, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Institutional Investors, International Corporate Governance & Regulation
Tagged Asset management, Boards of Directors, Institutional Investors, International governance, Labor markets, Mutual funds, Pension funds, Shareholder primacy, Stakeholders
1 Comment
Limiting the Reach of the FCPA
On August 24, 2018, in a rare, 73-page decision interpreting the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”), the Second Circuit in United States v. Hoskins largely rejected a Department of Justice (“DOJ”) interlocutory appeal and limited the FCPA’s reach, holding that foreign nationals who cannot be convicted as principals under the FCPA also cannot be held […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Court Cases, International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Anti-corruption, DOJ, Extraterritoriality, FCPA, Foreign firms, International governance, Jurisdiction, U.S. federal courts
Comments Off on Limiting the Reach of the FCPA
Streamlined SEC Disclosure Requirements
This post provides an overview of changes to existing disclosure requirements recently adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”). On August 17, 2018, the Commission adopted several dozen amendments (available here) to existing disclosure requirements to “simplify compliance without significantly altering the total mix of information” (the “Final Rules”). In Release No. 33-10532, […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation
Tagged Accounting, Accounting standards, Compliance and disclosure interpretation, Disclosure, Dividends, FAST Act, Regulation S-K, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities regulation
Comments Off on Streamlined SEC Disclosure Requirements
Remarks to the SEC Investor Advisory Committee
Thank you, Anne (Sheehan). Good morning everyone. I want to welcome, or should I say welcome back, Commissioner Elad Roisman. This is Commissioner Roisman’s first Investor Advisory Committee meeting. Elad was confirmed just last week and he joins us as the 98th Commissioner of the SEC. We met many years ago when Elad first worked […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications, Regulators Materials
Tagged Boards of Directors, Index funds, Institutional Investors, Investor protection, Proxy voting, SEC, Securities regulation, Shareholder voting
Comments Off on Remarks to the SEC Investor Advisory Committee
Statement on Shareholder Voting
Today [September 14, 2018], the Office of the Chairman and the Division of Investment Management suddenly raised questions about long-resolved issues regarding shareholder voting. Because the Investor Advisory Committee’s critical work in this area is ongoing, it’s important to clarify the path ahead for those interested in giving shareholders real access to the levers of […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Practitioner Publications, Regulators Materials, Securities Regulation, Speeches & Testimony
Tagged Boards of Directors, Institutional Investors, Proxy advisors, Retail investors, SEC, Securities regulation, Shareholder voting
Comments Off on Statement on Shareholder Voting
SEC No-Action Letters Related to Proxy Advisory Firms
You may recall that, in July, SEC Chair Jay Clayton announced that the SEC will be holding a Roundtable to discuss the proxy process, currently expected to be held in November. (See this PubCo post.) Among the potential topics identified was the role of proxy advisory firms and the question of whether investment advisers and […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Corporate Elections & Voting, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation
Tagged Institutional Investors, Investment advisers, No-action letters, Proxy advisors, SEC, Securities regulation, Shareholder voting
Comments Off on SEC No-Action Letters Related to Proxy Advisory Firms