Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation

Managing the Narrative: Investor Relations Officers and Corporate Disclosure

Although investor relations officers (IROs) play an important role in managing corporate communications with important stakeholders and in helping their companies achieve an appropriate valuation, the academic literature on investor relations is only in its early stages. IROs are responsible for communicating with the investment community and shaping the company narrative. As a result, IROs […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Accounting & Disclosure, Institutional Investors | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Managing the Narrative: Investor Relations Officers and Corporate Disclosure

Contracting Out of Appraisal Rights

In a recent opinion, the Delaware Court of Chancery, for the first time, held that contractual provisions in stockholder agreements barring common stockholders from exercising their statutory appraisal rights are enforceable as a matter of law, so long as the stockholders voluntarily signed the stockholder agreement in return for consideration, such as investment in the company. […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Contracting Out of Appraisal Rights

Lazard’s Review of Shareholder Activism—2018 3Q YTD

Key Observations on the Activist Environment through 3Q 2018 Record Level of Companies Targeted Activists targeted 174 companies in the first three quarters of 2018, surpassing 169 companies targeted in all of 2017 26% more campaigns initiated YTD over 2017 YTD, representing capital deployment of $53.8bn, in-line with 2017 YTD levels Nonetheless, 3Q witnessed a […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Institutional Investors, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Lazard’s Review of Shareholder Activism—2018 3Q YTD

Insider Trading and the Integrity of Mandatory Disclosure

For decades, two theories have shaped insider trading regulation. The first argues that insider trading should be prohibited because unequal access to information corrupts the integrity of markets. The second views trading on inside information as misappropriating property belonging to the corporation. Neither approach is entirely satisfying. The market integrity theory does not address the […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Accounting & Disclosure, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Securities Litigation & Enforcement, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Insider Trading and the Integrity of Mandatory Disclosure

A Watershed Development for “Material Adverse Effect” Clauses

On October 1, 2018, in Akorn, Inc. v. Fresenius Kabi AG, the Delaware Court of Chancery determined conclusively for the first time that a buyer had validly terminated a merger agreement due to the occurrence of a “material adverse effect” (MAE). Though the decision represents a seminal development in M&A litigation generally, Vice Chancellor Laster […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Cybersecurity Disclosure Benchmarking

Boards, executives, investors, regulators and other governance stakeholders have expressed growing interest in understanding how companies guard against, plan for and respond to cybersecurity incidents. As cybersecurity threats evolve and risks become more complex and widespread, focus on corporate disclosures in public filings on the subject likely will intensify. Cybersecurity crime is an increasing threat […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Boards of Directors, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Cybersecurity Disclosure Benchmarking

Reforming Director’s Long-Term Duties in the EU

The European Commission has taken up the debate on the obligations of company directors and will be analysing if they should be clarified at an EU level. This commitment is included in their Action Plan on Sustainable Finance aimed at transforming Europe’s economy and financial system into a sustainable one. The Commission seeks to attenuate […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Social Responsibility, International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Reforming Director’s Long-Term Duties in the EU

Proxy Access Proposals

In our fourth annual review of proxy access practices, we explore recent developments relating to adopt” and “fix-it” shareholder proposals, headline and key second-tier terms and amendments to adopted by-laws. Proxy Access—The March Forward Continues but at a Slower Pace The proxy access adoption trend continued in 2018, although at a more modest pace. An additional 53 […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Proxy Access Proposals

Weekly Roundup: October 12-18, 2018

Were Reports on the Demise of the Universal Proxy Premature? Posted by Cydney Posner, Cooley LLP, on Friday, October 12, 2018 Tags: Boards of Directors, Director nominations, Proxy contests, Proxy voting, SEC, Securities regulation, Shareholder voting, Universal proxy ballots SEC Sanctions Investment Firm for Inadequate Cybersecurity and Identity Theft Prevention Policies Posted by Sabastian V. Niles, Marshall L. Miller, and Jeohn Salone Favors, Wachtell, […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Weekly Roundup | Tagged | Comments Off on Weekly Roundup: October 12-18, 2018

Making Sense of the Current ESG Landscape

The question whether a public for-profit company can “do good” and make money at the same time has never been more relevant. Public companies are being bombarded with messages, requests and demands around “ESG”—environmental, social and governance—matters. These come from shareholders, asset managers, special interest groups, activist investors, private equity funds, ESG rating firms, trade […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Corporate Elections & Voting, Corporate Social Responsibility, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment