Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation

The Effect of Institutional Ownership Types On Innovation and Competition

In common ownership, the type of the common owner institution matters. Institutional ownership of firms has seen a marked rise in the past few decades, with average institutional ownership share of a firm rising from 20% to 30% in the 1980s to over 65% of the total by the 2010s, with residual retail ownership correspondingly […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Institutional Investors, Mergers & Acquisitions | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Effect of Institutional Ownership Types On Innovation and Competition

Smaller Reporting Companies and XBRL

The SEC has long recognized that smaller issuers should be subject to somewhat less stringent disclosure standards than larger companies. The SEC has referred to this as “scaled disclosure” and has embodied the idea in a series of rules for smaller reporting companies, or SRCs. The SEC has adopted final rules to expand the availability […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Smaller Reporting Companies and XBRL

The UK Corporate Governance Code

The Financial Reporting Council today [July 16, 2018] issued a revised corporate governance code and announced that a revised investor stewardship code will be issued before year-end. The code and related materials are available at www.frc.org.uk. The revised code contains two provisions that will be of great interest. They will undoubtedly be relied upon in […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Do Foreign Investors Improve Market Efficiency?

One of the key purposes of financial markets is to efficiently allocate capital to the real sector. Foreign investors have emerged as an important force in this process. As globalization has increased, financial markets have witnessed substantial inflows of capital from foreign investors. The empirical literature has studied the consequences of financial market liberalization for […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, International Corporate Governance & Regulation | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Do Foreign Investors Improve Market Efficiency?

2018 Investor Corporate Governance Report

The CMi2i 2018 Annual Investor Corporate Governance Report surveyed institutional shareholders representing $8 trillion of Assets under Management (“AUM”). The objective of the report is to find out which Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) areas they believe will be key issues of focus in 2018 and beyond, and the impact of this on shareholder behaviour. […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on 2018 Investor Corporate Governance Report

Supreme Court Ruling on SEC-Appointed Judges

On June 21, 2018, the Supreme Court ruled in Lucia v. SEC that Securities and Exchange Commission Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) are “officers” for the purposes of the Constitution’s Appointments Clause. Because, at the time he heard the case, the ALJ’s appointment was not consistent with that clause, it was deemed unconstitutional and the administrative […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Supreme Court Ruling on SEC-Appointed Judges

Are Institutional Investors with Multiple Blockholdings Effective Monitors?

Previous studies show that, unlike small dispersed shareholders, large shareholders have strong incentives to monitor management and take actions that increase firm value (Shleifer and Vishny, 1986; Demsetz and Lehn, 1985). Despite extensive research on the monitoring role of large shareholders, the literature has paid little attention to the fact that institutions frequently serve as […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Corporate Elections & Voting, Empirical Research, Institutional Investors | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Are Institutional Investors with Multiple Blockholdings Effective Monitors?

Delaware’s Voluntary Sustainability Certification Law

On June 27, 2018, Delaware Governor John Carney signed legislation enacting the Delaware Certification of Adoption of Transparency and Sustainability Standards Act (the “Act”), which will become effective on October 1, 2018. The Act, which is the first of its kind, represents Delaware’s initiative to support sustainability practices by providing Delaware-governed entities a platform for […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Corporate Social Responsibility, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Delaware’s Voluntary Sustainability Certification Law

An Empirical Comparison of Insider Trading Enforcement in Canada and the US

Canadian and American securities market regulators have differing approaches to enforcement. Canadian securities law is largely driven by provincial or territorial legislation and implemented by the jurisdiction’s respective securities commissions. In contrast, the American development of securities law is driven by the federal Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), with state regulators taking a secondary role. […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Empirical Research, International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Securities Litigation & Enforcement | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on An Empirical Comparison of Insider Trading Enforcement in Canada and the US

State Treasurers’ Opposition Against Forced Arbitration or Class Action Waivers in Shareholder Agreements

Dear Chairman Clayton: As a bipartisan coalition of State Treasurers from across the country, we recognize the dire fiscal matters that face our nation and understand the pitfalls that imperil the financial security of American investors. As institutional investors ourselves, we observe the critical importance of rigorous enforcement of the state and federal securities laws. […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Institutional Investors, Legislative & Regulatory Developments, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on State Treasurers’ Opposition Against Forced Arbitration or Class Action Waivers in Shareholder Agreements