-
Supported By:
Subscribe or Follow
Program on Corporate Governance Advisory Board
- Peter Atkins
- David Bell
- Kerry E. Berchem
- Richard Brand
- Daniel Burch
- Paul Choi
- Jesse Cohn
- Arthur B. Crozier Christine Davine
- Renata J. Ferrari
- Andrew Freedman
- Ray Garcia
- Byron Georgiou
- Joseph Hall
- Jason M. Halper William P. Mills
- David Millstone
- Theodore Mirvis
- Philip Richter
- Elina Tetelbaum
- Sebastian Tiller
- Marc Trevino Jonathan Watkins
- Steven J. Williams
HLS Faculty & Senior Fellows
Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation
Destructive Collectivism: Dodd-Frank Coordination and Clearinghouses
Research on financial regulation consistently focuses on several critical paradigms, including, inter alia, the calls for better economic justification of regulations and the role of the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC). Prominent commentators, including Robert Bartlett, John Coates, Jeffrey Gordon, Robert Jackson, Eric Posner, Cass Sunstein, and others, have dissected the pros and cons, as […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Accounting & Disclosure, Derivatives, Financial Regulation, Securities Regulation
Tagged Accounting, CFTC, Clearing houses, Derivatives, Dodd-Frank Act, Financial regulation, FSOC, Incentives, Information environment, Jurisdiction, Market efficiency, SEC, Securities regulation
Comments Off on Destructive Collectivism: Dodd-Frank Coordination and Clearinghouses
A Long/Short Incentive Scheme for Proxy Advisory Firms
In our new paper, we propose a novel framework for an incentive pay scheme for proxy advisory firms. Proxy advisory firms play an influential role and wield extensive influence over major corporate decisions in the United States and all over the world. The leading proxy advisory firms—Institutional Shareholder Services (“ISS”) and Glass, Lewis & Co. […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting
Tagged Glass Lewis, Incentives, ISS, Proxy advisors, Say on pay, Shareholder voting
Comments Off on A Long/Short Incentive Scheme for Proxy Advisory Firms
From Talking the Talk to Voting the Votes
Management teams at companies often say that they wished they had more clarity from their investors as to the types of sustainability data and disclosures that they would like to see. They believe that it is difficult to understand which, if any, of the many different surveys and questionnaires that they get from data providers, […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Corporate Elections & Voting, Corporate Social Responsibility, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation
Tagged Accounting, Corporate Social Responsibility, Disclosure, Environmental disclosure, ESG, Market efficiency, Proxy advisors, Proxy voting, Public interest, SASB, Securities regulation, Shareholder voting, Sustainability
Comments Off on From Talking the Talk to Voting the Votes
Mergers and Acquisitions: 2018 With a Brief Look Back
M&A vastly accelerated in the fourth quarter of 2017, as confidence increased in the likelihood of U.S. tax and regulatory reform. U.S. M&A in particular had a very strong fourth quarter, with the volume in that quarter accounting for more than a third of the full year’s volume and up 75% from the third quarter. […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications, Private Equity
Tagged Antitrust, Appraisal rights, Banks, China, Cross-border transactions, Financial institutions, International governance, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Private equity, Shareholder activism, Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, Taxation, Tech companies
Comments Off on Mergers and Acquisitions: 2018 With a Brief Look Back
Activism in 2018
Two years ago, we explained to clients that the shareholder activism landscape was undergoing significant change. Returns at many of the “brand name” activist funds were down, companies had become savvier at messaging to their investors about why their positions on areas of activist focus were well-founded and, in numerous cases, companies had preemptively taken […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Institutional Investors, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Board composition, Boards of Directors, Diversity, Hedge funds, Index funds, Institutional Investors, Long-Term value, Mergers & acquisitions, Proxy contests, Shareholder activism, Shareholder voting
Comments Off on Activism in 2018
The Effects of Investment Bank Rankings: Evidence from M&A League Tables
In the article The Effects of Investment Bank Rankings: Evidence from M&A League Tables, forthcoming in the Review of Finance, we study how league tables affect the behavior of investment banks in the M&A industry. League tables are simple rankings based on banks’ market shares. Anecdotal evidence suggests that banks pay a lot of attention […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Banking & Financial Institutions, Empirical Research, Mergers & Acquisitions
Tagged Banks, Fairness review, Financial institutions, Incentives, Investment banking, League tables, Mergers & acquisitions, Peer groups, Reputation
Comments Off on The Effects of Investment Bank Rankings: Evidence from M&A League Tables
The Corporate Governance World in 2018: A Global Review
2017 was an eventful year in corporate governance. With significant shifts in investor preferences, voting outcomes, societal norms, and the regulatory environment, 2018 promises to be just as eventful. In anticipation of the New Year, we asked our research experts around the globe to gaze into the crystal ball and give us their predictions in […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Executive Compensation, Institutional Investors, International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation
Tagged Board composition, Boards of Directors, Canada, China, Compensation ratios, Corporate culture, Diversity, Environmental disclosure, ESG, EU, Europe, Executive Compensation, India, International governance, Mergers & acquisitions, Securities regulation, Shareholder activism, Shareholder proposals, Shareholder voting, Sustainability, UK
Comments Off on The Corporate Governance World in 2018: A Global Review
Points to Remember When Preparing Your Form 10-K
With all of the substantive issues impacting disclosures in companies’ upcoming annual reports, there are a few technical points reporting companies should bear in mind when preparing their annual report. Note that some of these issues are easy to miss given that they are not yet reflected in the official PDF of Form 10-K. Addition […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation
Tagged Compliance and disclosure interpretation, Disclosure, Financial reporting, Form 10-K, JOBS Act, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities regulation, Small firms
Comments Off on Points to Remember When Preparing Your Form 10-K
Uncertainty, Prospectus Content, and the Pricing of Initial Public Offerings
Setting the offer price of an initial public offering (IPO) to accurately reflect the value of a firm’s common stock creates high stakes for both the firm and its underwriters. Pricing the shares too low would result in a wealth transfer from old shareholders to new shareholders; pricing the shares too high may result in […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Accounting & Disclosure, Banking & Financial Institutions
Tagged Books and records, Disclosure, Due diligence, Fair values, Information environment, Inside information, Investment banking, IPOs, Underpricing, Underwriting
Comments Off on Uncertainty, Prospectus Content, and the Pricing of Initial Public Offerings