Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation

Analysis of ISS’ Proxy Voting Guidelines

Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) published annual updates to its proxy voting guidelines in November, followed by a set of preliminary FAQs offering further clarity around changes the shareholder advisory firm will implement in its voting recommendations next year. These much-anticipated updates will apply to U.S. public companies* holding shareholder meetings on or after February 1, 2018. ISS […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Analysis of ISS’ Proxy Voting Guidelines

Analysis of Final Tax Reform Legislation

Final bill retains key aspects of House and Senate proposals with some surprise last-minute modifications. On December 15, 2017, a conference committee composed of members of the US House of Representatives and the US Senate approved a Conference Report (the Report) reconciling the tax reform bills passed by each chamber. Both the House and the […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Legislative & Regulatory Developments, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Top 5 Things Shareholder Activists Need to Know

Nomination deadlines for the 2018 proxy season are fast approaching. Based on feedback from our shareholder activist clients and colleagues in the activism community, we are preparing for a very busy nomination season, which will begin to pick up steam in the next few weeks and continue into the new year. Drawing from our experience […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Top 5 Things Shareholder Activists Need to Know

Weekly Roundup: December 15-21, 2017

Holder Claims: Potential Causes of Action in Delaware and Beyond? Posted by Edward T. McDermott (McCarter & English LLP), on Friday, December 15, 2017 Tags: Delaware articles, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Holder claims, Liability standards, Reliance, Securities fraud, Securities litigation, Shareholder suits, State law Analysis of Wells Fargo Shareholder Litigation Posted by Brad S. Karp, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, on Friday, December 15, 2017 […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Weekly Roundup | Tagged | Comments Off on Weekly Roundup: December 15-21, 2017

Finding the Right Balance in Appraisal Litigation: Deal Price, Deal Process, and Synergies

This paper examines the evolution of Delaware appraisal litigation and concludes that recent precedents have created a satisfactory framework in which the remedy is most effective in the case of transactions where there is the greatest reason to question the efficacy of the market for corporate control, and vice versa. The article suggests that, in […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Court Cases, Mergers & Acquisitions | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Finding the Right Balance in Appraisal Litigation: Deal Price, Deal Process, and Synergies

The Limits of Shareholder Ratification for Discretionary Director Compensation

In re Investor Bancorp, Inc. Stockholder Litigation, issued by the Delaware Supreme Court on Dec. 13, 2017, may result in challenges to compensation awarded to directors pursuant to existing discretionary equity plans and is likely to affect the structure of future equity plans. The Supreme Court, at the motion to dismiss stage, rejected the Court […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Court Cases, Executive Compensation, Securities Litigation & Enforcement | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Limits of Shareholder Ratification for Discretionary Director Compensation

Passive Fund Providers and Investment Stewardship

As assets continue to flow from actively managed to index-tracking strategies, the largest index asset managers are becoming increasingly influential, often ranking among the largest investors of public companies. Despite this fact, little research has been done to understand how index managers carry out their investment stewardship responsibilities. It is legitimate to assume that devoting […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Corporate Elections & Voting, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Passive Fund Providers and Investment Stewardship

Meaningful Limits on Director Pay

A wave of lawsuits surrounding director compensation surfaced a couple of years ago, often alleging “excessive” pay for boards of directors on a variety of grounds. Because boards set their own pay levels, there are potential legal ramifications due to the “self-dealing” nature of director compensation. While lawsuits were settled and subsequent litigation has subsided, the topic […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Boards of Directors, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

The Supreme Court’s Non-Transsubstantive Class Action

The year 2016 marked the fiftieth anniversary of the adoption of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 23, and with it, the advent of the modern class action. As the fiftieth anniversary approached, many scholars, including myself, said that class actions were dead, dying, or headed for a zombie state. Many of the Supreme Court’s […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Court Cases, Securities Litigation & Enforcement | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on The Supreme Court’s Non-Transsubstantive Class Action

Proposed Revisions to the UK’s Corporate Governance Regime

On 5 December the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) published proposals for the latest revisions to the UK Corporate Governance Code (the Code), which are due to be published by “early summer” 2018 and will be effective for all accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2019. The stated aim of the FRC in proposing […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Boards of Directors, Executive Compensation, International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Legislative & Regulatory Developments, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Proposed Revisions to the UK’s Corporate Governance Regime