Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation

FINRA Proposes to Disseminate Transaction Reports in Corporate Debt Securities

FINRA has proposed a trade-reporting rule change that would result in the public dissemination of secondary market transactions in corporate debt securities sold under Securities Act Rule 144A. If adopted, this change could affect secondary market transactions in a number of assets classes, including high-yield debt securities. Introduction On July 8, 2013, the US Financial […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Banking & Financial Institutions, Financial Regulation, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

SEC Rejects Proposed Settlement with Harbinger Capital and Its Manager

In a regulatory filing made on July 19, 2013, Harbinger Group, Inc. (Harbinger Group), a publicly traded investment company, announced that the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) had rejected an agreement in principle that Harbinger Group had reached with the staff of the SEC’s Enforcement Division. The agreement was to settle allegations that Philip […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on SEC Rejects Proposed Settlement with Harbinger Capital and Its Manager

Some Descriptive Data on Settlement Timing in Securities Class Actions

In a recent article in the PLUS Journal, we presented some simple statistics on settlement timing in securities class actions. The data cover cases filed between 2006 and 2010 and settled between 2006 and 2012. They come from a database we recently completed and will keep current. The article can be found on the PLUS […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Empirical Research, Securities Litigation & Enforcement | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Some Descriptive Data on Settlement Timing in Securities Class Actions

2013 Amendments to the DGCL and DLLCA

The Delaware General Assembly has adopted, and Delaware’s governor has signed into law, several important amendments to the State’s General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”) and Limited Liability Company Act (the “DLLCA”). Of particular interest to corporate and M&A practitioners are the following provisions: New DGCL Section 251(h), which eliminates the need for stockholder approval of […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Legislative & Regulatory Developments, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on 2013 Amendments to the DGCL and DLLCA

Tax Avoidance and Geographic Earnings Disclosure

Multinational firms can avoid taxes through structured transactions among different jurisdictions (e.g., Rego 2003), such as reallocating taxable income from high-tax jurisdictions to low-tax ones (Collins et al. 1998). This type of income shifting significantly reduces tax revenues of governments in high-tax jurisdictions and potentially hinders domestic economic growth and other social benefits (e.g., GAO […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Accounting & Disclosure, Empirical Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Tax Avoidance and Geographic Earnings Disclosure

2013 Proxy Season Review

Corporate America’s “proxy season” has now wrapped up: most of America’s large publicly traded companies hold annual meetings to vote on business, including shareholder proposals, between April 15 and the end of June. Among the 250 largest U.S. public companies by revenues that constitute the Manhattan Institute’s Proxy Monitor database, 214 had held meetings by […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Executive Compensation, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on 2013 Proxy Season Review

Renewed Focus on “Unbundling”

The recent decision by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in Greenlight Capital LP v. Apple Inc. [1] serves as a good reminder of the importance of ensuring that management proposals do not run afoul of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) unbundling rules. Impermissible “bundling” of management proposals, as […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Renewed Focus on “Unbundling”

2013 Mid-Year Securities Litigation Update

Filing and Settlement Trends Filing and settlement trends continue to reflect “business as usual” for the plaintiffs’ bar—hundreds of suits and significant settlement values can be expected for the rest of 2013, based on results from the early half of the year. According to a recent study by NERA Economic Consulting, the annualized rate of […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Court Cases, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on 2013 Mid-Year Securities Litigation Update

Investor Organizations Oppose Tightening of Canadian Disclosure Regime

The Managed Funds Association (“MFA”) and the Alternative Investment Management Association (“AIMA”) and have jointly submitted a comment letter with the Canadian Securities Administrators with respect to proposed changes to Canada’s block shareholder reporting regimes known in Canada as the Early Warning Reporting (“EWR”) system and the Alternative Monthly Reporting (“AMR”) system. The EWR and […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Corporate Elections & Voting, International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Investor Organizations Oppose Tightening of Canadian Disclosure Regime

Golden Parachute Compensation Practice Pointers

For a variety of practical and legal reasons, compensation to be paid in connection with the sale of a public company (which this article will refer to as “golden parachute compensation”) is best addressed well before an M&A transaction is being contemplated. There are a multitude of issues that are raised when designing these sorts […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Executive Compensation, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Golden Parachute Compensation Practice Pointers