Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation

Staggered Boards and the Wealth of Shareholders: Evidence from the two Airgas Rulings

The Program on Corporate Governance just issued our paper Staggered Boards and the Wealth of Shareholders: Evidence from a Natural Experiment. While staggered boards are known to be negatively correlated with firm valuation, such association might be due to staggered boards either bringing about lower firm value or merely being the product of the tendency […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Court Cases, Empirical Research, HLS Research | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Staggered Boards and the Wealth of Shareholders: Evidence from the two Airgas Rulings

Computerization and the Abacus: Reputation, Trust, and Fiduciary Duties in Investment Banking

Editor’s Note: Steven Davidoff is a Professor of Law at the University of Connecticut. This post is based on a paper by Mr. Davidoff, William J. Wilhelm, Jr. of the University of Virginia, and Alan D. Morrison of the University of Oxford. In our essay Computerization and the Abacus: Reputation, Trust, and Fiduciary Duties in Investment […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Banking & Financial Institutions, Financial Crisis, Financial Regulation, Legislative & Regulatory Developments, Securities Litigation & Enforcement | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Computerization and the Abacus: Reputation, Trust, and Fiduciary Duties in Investment Banking

2010 Year-End Securities Enforcement Update

I. Overview of 2010 The year 2010 has been a watershed year for securities enforcement. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act gave the SEC additional enforcement powers, while also bringing additional market participants under SEC registration and potentially elevating the standards of conduct for other securities professionals. At the same time, the […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Banking & Financial Institutions, Legislative & Regulatory Developments, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on 2010 Year-End Securities Enforcement Update

Capital-Market Effects of Securities Regulation

In the paper, Capital-Market Effects of Securities Regulation: The Role of Implementation and Enforcement, which was recently made publicly available on SSRN, my co-authors (Hans Christensen of the University of Chicago and Luzi Hail of the University of Pennsylvania) and I examine capital-market effects of changes in securities regulation. We focus on two key EU […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Empirical Research, International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Securities Litigation & Enforcement, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Capital-Market Effects of Securities Regulation

Summary of the Volcker Rule Study – Hedge Funds and Private Equity Funds

The study by the Financial Stability Oversight Council (“FSOC”) [1] of the funds portion of the Volcker Rule includes useful findings and recommendations on the definitions of “hedge funds,” “private equity funds” and “banking entities,” but leaves a number of important questions unanswered. To provide an idea of the number and nature of important questions […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Banking & Financial Institutions, Financial Regulation, Institutional Investors, Legislative & Regulatory Developments, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Summary of the Volcker Rule Study – Hedge Funds and Private Equity Funds

Forum Selection Bylaw Clause Rejected by Court

In a matter of first impression, the United States Federal District Court for the Northern District of California recently denied motions to dismiss a derivative action for improper venue, finding the forum selection clause in the corporate bylaws of a Delaware corporation to be unenforceable.  The decision in Galaviz v. Berg, No. 10-cv-3392, slip op. […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Derivatives, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

CFOs versus CEOs: Equity Incentives and Crashes

In the study, CFOs versus CEOs: Equity Incentives and Crashes, forthcoming in the Journal of Financial Economics, we examine the impact of executive equity incentives on a firm’s stock price crash risk. Based on a recent theoretical study by Benmelech, Kandel, and Veronesi (2010), we argue that equity incentives motivate managers to conceal bad news […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Empirical Research, Executive Compensation | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Final SEC Rules on Say-on-Pay Voting and Disclosures

Editor’s Note: This post comes to us from John J. Cannon, a partner in the Executive Compensation and Employee Benefits Group at Shearman & Sterling LLP, and is based on a Shearman & Sterling Client Memorandum by Mr. Cannon, Jeffrey Crandall, Kenneth Laverriere, Doreen Lilienfeld and Linda Rappaport. An earlier post by Lucian Bebchuk and […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Corporate Elections & Voting, Executive Compensation, Financial Regulation, Legislative & Regulatory Developments | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Final SEC Rules on Say-on-Pay Voting and Disclosures

SEC Study on the Fiduciary Duty of Investment Advisers and Broker-Dealers

General Observations Background. On January 21, 2011, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC” or “Commission”) released its much anticipated staff study on the effectiveness of the standards of care required of broker-dealers and investment advisers providing personalized investment advice about securities to retail customers (the “Study”). As required by Section 913 of the Dodd-Frank […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Banking & Financial Institutions, Legislative & Regulatory Developments, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Delaware Confirms Fairness of Third-Party Transaction with Controlled Company

In a recent post-trial decision, the Delaware Court of Chancery upheld as entirely fair the third-party acquisition of a controlled company in which the controlling shareholder received consideration that differed from that provided to the public minority. In re John Q. Hammons Hotels Inc. S’holder Litig., C.A. No. 758-CC (Del. Ch. Jan. 14, 2011). The […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Delaware Confirms Fairness of Third-Party Transaction with Controlled Company