-
Supported By:

Subscribe or Follow
Program on Corporate Governance Advisory Board
- Peter Atkins
- David Bell
- Kerry E. Berchem
- Richard Brand
- Daniel Burch
- Paul Choi
- Jesse Cohn
- Arthur B. Crozier Christine Davine
- Renata J. Ferrari
- Andrew Freedman
- Ray Garcia
- Byron Georgiou
- Joseph Hall
- Jason M. Halper William P. Mills
- David Millstone
- Theodore Mirvis
- Philip Richter
- Elina Tetelbaum
- Sebastian Tiller
- Marc Trevino Jonathan Watkins
- Steven J. Williams
HLS Faculty & Senior Fellows
Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation
Shell to Appeal Court Ruling in Netherlands Climate Case
In a recent Blog Post on May 28, 2021, we discussed a landmark court ruling issued by the Hague District Court in May 2021, requiring Royal Dutch Shell (Shell) to reduce the CO₂ emissions of the Shell group by net 45% in 2030, compared to 2019 levels. In a statement on July 21, 2021, Shell confirmed […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, ESG, International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Class actions, Climate change, Corporate liability, ESG, International governance, Liability standards, Netherlands, Royal Dutch Shell
Comments Off on Shell to Appeal Court Ruling in Netherlands Climate Case
Surging M&A Megadeals Top Records In Q2
The second quarter of 2021 saw the announcement of megadeals (deals worth US$5 billion or more) totaling US$734.4 billion in value—more than in any other quarter on Mergermarket record (since 2006). Megadeal volume hit 45, the third-highest number in any quarter on record. Activity at the top end was dominated by the US, with 25 megadeal […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications, Private Equity
Tagged EU, Europe, International governance, Mergers & acquisitions, Private equity
Comments Off on Surging M&A Megadeals Top Records In Q2
A New Variation in SEC Insider Trading Enforcement
Earlier this week, the SEC filed a complaint in the Northern District of California alleging insider-trading charges that may signal a more aggressive approach to enforcement under the agency’s new leadership. In SEC v. Panuwat, the SEC charged a corporate executive who learned about an impending acquisition of his employer and then traded in the […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement, Securities Regulation
Tagged Information asymmetries, Inside information, Insider trading, Liability standards, Materiality, SEC, SEC enforcement, Securities enforcement
Comments Off on A New Variation in SEC Insider Trading Enforcement
The Difference Between Purpose and Sustainability (aka ESG)
Corporate purpose and sustainability (often referred to by the acronym of ESG for environmental, social, and governance) are now part of the mainstream lexicon in the corporate and investment communities. The two terms are often used interchangeably as synonyms. This is wrong. Purpose and sustainability are related but different ideas. Purpose comes first. Sustainability can […]
Click here to read the complete postWeekly Roundup: August 13–19, 2021
Court of Chancery Decision Provides Guidance for Drafting MAE Clauses Posted by Gail Weinstein, Steven Epstein, and Philip Richter, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, on Friday, August 13, 2021 Tags: Adverse effects, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Materiality, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Risk disclosure, Termination 2021 Proxy Season Trends: Executive Compensation Posted by Pamela Marcogliese, Lori Goodman, and Elizabeth Bieber, Freshfields Bruckhaus […]
Click here to read the complete postBuilding on Common Ground to Advance Sustainable Capitalism
Introduction There is a growing consensus in the global business and investment community that sustainable and inclusive capitalism is vital to society, the environment, and the economy. This paradigm shift is propelling corporate purpose to the top of the agenda for directors and investors. The first report from the Enacting Purpose Initiative, Enacting Purpose Within […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, ESG, Executive Compensation, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Board composition, Boards of Directors, Corporate purpose, Diversity, Engagement, ESG, Executive Compensation, Incentives, Institutional Investors, Long-Term value, Stakeholders
Comments Off on Building on Common Ground to Advance Sustainable Capitalism
Public Entrepreneurial Finance around the Globe
In recent decades, governments around the world have been increasingly interested in boosting innovation and the “knowledge economy,” as opposed to the manufacturing sectors that were the traditional focus of industrial policies. One manifestation of this trend has been through public efforts to boost financing for early-stage ventures. Given the important role played by the […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Empirical Research, International Corporate Governance & Regulation
Tagged Capital formation, Entrepreneurs, Information environment, International governance, Private firms, Public finance, Subsidies, Venture capital firms
Comments Off on Public Entrepreneurial Finance around the Globe
Tackling the Climate Crisis
Despite the challenges, Ceres continued to expand our networks of powerful investors and companies, adding 44 new members in 2020. Just before the year began, we released the new Ceres Roadmap 2030, a 10-year action plan to help companies navigate and succeed in the accelerated transition to a just, inclusive, net zero emissions future. And […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in ESG, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Asset management, Climate change, Engagement, Environmental disclosure, ESG, Index funds, Institutional Investors, Sustainability
Comments Off on Tackling the Climate Crisis
CEO Tenure and Firm Value
Among academics and practitioners, there is an ongoing debate over whether CEOs stay in office too long. Empirically, a mosaic of evidence suggests that corporate outcomes – such as earnings management (Ali and Zhang, 2015), firm-customer and firm-employee relationships (Luo et al., 2014), innovation (Wu et al., 2005), net investments (Pan et al., 2016), and […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Empirical Research
Tagged Executive turnover, Firm performance, Management, Manager characteristics, Succession
Comments Off on CEO Tenure and Firm Value