Yearly Archives: 2016

M&A Agreements and the Challenges of PRC Acquirors

Ethan A. Klingsberg is a partner in the New York office of Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP. This post is based on a Cleary Gottlieb publication by Mr. Klingsberg and Rob Gruszecki.

Companies based in the People’s Republic of China have committed to over $100 billion of overseas acquisitions since January 1, 2016, including a number of high profile targets in the United States and Europe. [1] The ties of these buyers to governmental entities in the PRC, coupled with the unpredictability of the PRC government, and the challenges that a non-PRC counterparty faces when seeking to enforce contractual obligations and non-PRC judgments in PRC courts has led practitioners to implement an array of innovative provisions in M&A Agreements.

READ MORE »

13 Observations about the SEC’s Enforcement Program

Jonathan N. Eisenberg is partner in the Government Enforcement practice at K&L Gates LLP. This post is based on a K&L Gates publication by Mr. Eisenberg.

Over the last two months, the SEC issued two reports that provide useful perspectives on its enforcement program. In February, it issued the combined 136-page “FY 2017 Congressional Justification & FY 2015 Annual Performance Report and FY 2017 Annual Performance Plan.” In March, it issued its “SEC Accomplishments: April 2013–March 2016.” We glean the following important lessons from these reports:

READ MORE »

Rationalizing the Dodd-Frank Clawback

Jesse Fried is a Professor of Law at Harvard Law School. This post is based on an article authored by Professor Fried. Related research from the Program on Corporate Governance includes Excess-Pay Clawbacks by Jesse Fried and Nitzan Shilon (discussed on the Forum here).

In Rationalizing the Dodd-Frank Clawback, recently made publicly available on SSRN, I analyze and critique the SEC’s proposed Dodd-Frank clawback. I explain that while the proposed clawback would reduce executives’ incentives to misreport, it is too broad. The economy and investors would be better served by a more narrowly targeted “smart” excess-pay clawback that focuses on fewer issuers, executives, and compensation arrangements.

Section 954 of the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act will, when implemented, require issuers with securities listed on a national exchange to create and enforce an excess-pay clawback. In a nutshell, the Dodd-Frank clawback requires an issuer that has restated its financials to recover from a covered executive who had received “incentive-based compensation” the excess (if any) of (a) the incentive-based compensation she actually received over (b) the incentive-based compensation she would have received under the restated financials. There is no need to prove executive misconduct. On July 1, 2015, the SEC proposed a rule (Proposed Rule 10D-1) to implement the Dodd-Frank clawback. The rule has not yet been finalized.

READ MORE »

FinTech: New Regulatory Developments

This post is based on a Sullivan & Cromwell LLP publication authored by Mitchell S. Eitel, C. Andrew Gerlach, Rebecca J. Simmons, Stephen H. Lam. The complete publication, including footnotes, is available here.

On March 31, 2016, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the “OCC”), the regulator of federally chartered national banks and savings associations, released a white paper that sets forth the OCC’s perspective on supporting responsible innovation in the federal banking system (the “White Paper”). The release of the White Paper represents the most significant effort by a U.S. federal financial regulator to provide guidance for financial institutions and companies regarding the development of products and services in the financial technology (“FinTech”) sector and identifies the principles that the OCC plans to use as it continues to develop its comprehensive framework for understanding and evaluating innovative products, services and processes.

READ MORE »

Halliburton II: Presumption of Reliance

Brad S. Karp is chairman and partner at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP. This post is based on a Paul Weiss client memorandum by Mr. Karp, Charles E. DavidowAudra J. SolowayAndrew J. Ehrlich, and Geoffrey R. Chepiga. Related research from the Program on Corporate Governance includes Rethinking Basic by Lucian Bebchuk and Allen Ferrell (discussed on the Forum here).

On April 12, 2016, in IBEW Local 98 Pension Fund v. Best Buy Co., Inc., [1] the Eighth Circuit interpreted and applied the Supreme Court’s decision in Halliburton Co. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc. (“Halliburton II”), [2] which held that defendants have the right to rebut the fraud-on-the-market presumption of reliance created by Basic, Inc. v. Levinson, [3] prior to the certification of a class, by showing a lack of “price impact.” The Eighth Circuit held that the Best Buy defendants successfully rebutted the presumption with a “front-end” showing of a lack of price impact—i.e., that the alleged misstatements did not cause a statistically significant stock-price increase when made.

READ MORE »

U.S. Executive Compensation: 2015 Recap, Developments & Trends

Avrohom J. Kess is partner and head of the Public Company Advisory Practice and Yafit Cohn is an associate at Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP. This post is based on the Executive Summary of a co-published memorandum from Simpson Thacher and Frederic W. Cook & Co., authored by Mr. Kess, Ms. Cohn, and Jamin R. Koslowe of Simpson Thacher; and Bindu Culas and Metin Aksoy of FW Cook. The complete publication is available here.

For public companies, boards of directors, and practitioners, 2015 was an eventful year in executive compensation. This post presents the key developments and trends we observed during 2015 and their implications for 2016 and beyond.

In 2015, consistent with prior years, an overwhelming percentage of Russell 3000 companies obtained majority “Say-on-Pay” support. In 2015, Say-on-Pay voting entered its fifth year.

  • 2,121 companies (97%) passed Say-on-Pay, and 56 companies (3%) failed.
  • On average, passing companies had a 92% approval rate, while those that failed had a 39% approval rate.
  • On a related note, approximately 80% of Russell 3000 companies hold annual Say-on-Pay votes.

READ MORE »

Supercharged IPOs: Rent Extraction or Signal of Future Firm Performance?

Sonja Olhoft Rego is Professor of Accounting at Indiana University. This post is based on an article authored by Professor Rego, Alexander Edwards, Assistant Professor of Accounting at the University of Toronto; and Michelle Hutchens of the Department of Accounting at Indiana University.

A new structure for initial public offerings (IPOs), colloquially referred to as “supercharged IPOs,” has become increasingly popular in recent years. In our paper, Supercharged IPOs: Rent Extraction or Signal of Future Performance, which was recently made publicly available on SSRN, we examine the motivations and implications of this new IPO structure. In a traditional IPO, a private corporation “goes public” by issuing new shares of capital stock in exchange for cash from new investors on the open market. In a supercharged IPO, a series of transactions are typically performed as part of the IPO process, which generates new tax assets (e.g., larger future tax deductions) for the corporation but also creates a tax liability for the pre-IPO owners. The future tax benefits generated by the new tax assets are then split between the new IPO investors and the pre-IPO owners based on a contract, typically referred to as a “tax receivable agreement” (TRA). These arrangements allow pre-IPO owners to retain some portion of difficult-to-value assets (i.e., future tax benefits), which were created under their ownership and may otherwise be discounted by potential IPO investors.

READ MORE »

Weekly Roundup: April 8–April 14, 2016


More from:

This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of April 8, 2016 to April 14, 2016.















Statement from Chair White on Regulation S-K Concept Release

Mary Jo White is Chair of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The following post is based on Chair White’s remarks at a recent open meeting of the SEC, available here. The views expressed in this post are those of Chair White and do not necessarily reflect those of the Securities and Exchange Commission, the other Commissioners, or the Staff.

Today [April 13, 2016], the Commission will consider two separate recommendations from the staff. First, we will consider and vote on a recommendation from the Division of Corporation Finance to issue, as another important step in its disclosure effectiveness review, a concept release on modernizing certain business and financial disclosures required by Regulation S-K. Second, we will consider and vote on a recommendation from the Division of Trading and Markets to adopt final rules for the business conduct standards of security-based swap dealers and major security-based swap participants, rules essential to completing our regulatory regime under Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act. I will discuss the recommendations in the order they will be presented, turning first to the recommendation from the Division of Corporation Finance.

READ MORE »

Statement from Commissioner Stein on
Regulation S-K

Kara M. Stein is a Commissioner at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. This post is based on Commissioner Stein’s recent remarks at an open meeting of the SEC, available here. The views expressed in this post are those of Commissioner Stein and do not necessarily reflect those of the Securities and Exchange Commission, the other Commissioners, or the Staff.

Justice Brandeis once wrote, “[s]unlight is said to be the best of disinfectants; electric light the most efficient policeman.” But he warned, “[t]o be effective, knowledge of the facts must be actually brought home to the investors…” [1]

Today [April 13, 2016], the Commission considers issuing a Concept Release on how to improve our disclosure framework and how to better bring “knowledge of the facts…home to… investors.” At the moment, we are focusing on the rules that cover non-financial statement corporate disclosures, otherwise known as Regulation S-K.

READ MORE »

Page 60 of 78
1 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 78