Roberto J. Gonzalez is a partner in the Washington DC office of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP. This post is based on a Paul Weiss publication by Mr. Gonzalez; Susanna M. Buergel; Brad S. Karp; Jane B. O’Brien; and Elizabeth M. Sacksteder.
On October 11, 2016, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals held in PHH Corp. v. CFPB that the structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) as an independent agency headed by a single Director violated Article II of the Constitution. [1] As a remedy, the court struck the Director’s “for cause” removal protection, such that the CFPB would no longer be an “independent agency” but could continue to operate. We describe below the court’s ruling and explore the potential implications for the CFPB and regulated entities as we approach the presidential election.