Monthly Archives: August 2026

Director Compensation Is Up, But Not For Leadership Roles

Matthew Vnuk is a Partner, Kyle White is a Senior Associate, and Cedrick Jean-Louis is a Senior Analyst at Compensation Advisory Partners. This post is based on their CAP memorandum.

Each year, CAP analyzes non-employee director compensation programs among the 100 largest US public companies. These companies are trendsetters and can provide early insights into evolving pay practices across the broader public company marketplace. This report reflects a summary of pay levels, pay practices, and trends based on the most recent (2026) proxy disclosures for these 100 companies.

READ MORE »

Weekly Roundup: August 21-27, 2026


More from:

This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of August 21-27, 2026

AI Governance for Private Companies





Splitting Caremark’s Atom






Deprogramming Corporations





2026 Proxy Season Global Trends: Boards of Directors

Brianna Castro is the Vice President, Ayşen Çelikmen is a Senior Analyst, and Federica Soro is a Senior Manager at Glass, Lewis & Co. This post is based on a Glass Lewis memorandum by Ms. Castro, Ms. Celikmen, Ms. Soro, Decky Windarto, Troy McKeown, and Naoko Ueno, all at Glass, Lewis & Co.

Key Takeaways

  • Cybersecurity oversight is now nearly universal at large cap companies. Defined board oversight of AI is emerging quickly, but still lags behind.
  • Shareholder voting on board elections remained largely consistent in North America.
  • While average opposition levels remained minimal among large European companies, instances of significant voting dissent on director elections more than doubled.
  • Most large-cap European and UK companies met new rules on gender balance, however, executive diversity remains below board-wide levels across Europe.
  • Board racial/ethnic diversity increased among North American and UK companies, but the trend of fewer U.S. companies providing aggregate or individual director reporting continued.

READ MORE »

FinCEN Permanently Eliminates BOI Reporting Requirements for US Companies and US Persons

Matthew Bisanz and Brad A. Resnikoff are Partners and Marcella Barganz is a Counsel at Mayer Brown LLP. This post is based on a Mayer Brown memorandum by Mr. Bisanz, Mr. Resnikoff, Ms. Barganz, Lorenz A. Taets, and Kelly F. Truesdale, all at Mayer Brown LLP.

On August 11, 2026, the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) issued a final rule (the “Final Rule”) that permanently removes the requirement for US companies and US persons to report beneficial ownership information (“BOI”) to FinCEN under the Corporate Transparency Act (the “CTA”). The Final Rule was published in the Federal Register on August 14, 2026, and became effective immediately upon publication.

The Final Rule adopts all of the changes made on an interim basis in the interim final rule issued on March 26, 2025 (the “IFR”) as permanent changes. As discussed in our prior Legal Update, such changes narrowed FinCEN’s beneficial ownership information reporting requirements to apply only to foreign entities registered to do business in the United States. Specifically, the Final Rule confirms the elimination of reporting obligations for millions of US small businesses, resolves open questions flagged in our prior Legal Updates regarding FinCEN identifiers and company applicants, and announces the planned deletion of previously reported US person data from FinCEN’s BOI IT system (the “BOI IT System”). The Secretary of the Treasury’s issuance of the Final Rule cements its exercise of statutory exemptive authority under the CTA and the Bank Secrecy Act more generally.

READ MORE »

Rethinking the Use of Performance Share Units

Sam Gutenmacher is a Consultant at Semler Brossy. This post is based on a Semler Brossy memorandum by Mr. Gutenmacher and Michelle Metros, formerly at Semler Brossy.

While many of the practices discussed are, and should remain, prominent components of pay programs, shifting investor preferences and macroeconomic challenges make this a good time for compensation committees to review their current programs and ensure they’re still the best option to drive both pay-for-performance alignment and long-term value creation. In this article, we take a comprehensive, thought-provoking look at areas of the executive pay status quo to explore why they became industry standards, how you can determine if they’re right for your organization, and several alternative models that are emerging.

READ MORE »

Deprogramming Corporations

Mariana Pargendler is the Beneficial Professor of Law at Harvard Law School. This post is based on her working paper.

The 2024 and 2025 reforms of Delaware corporate law passed with unprecedented speed, and Texas and Nevada now compete in an overt race to laxity. Whatever one makes of these developments, most of the existing contestation focuses on the effects on agency costs and shareholder value. That is the vocabulary prevailing frameworks make available, and it is a weak hand to play when stock prices are rising. In a new essay, Deprogramming Corporations, I examine how this impoverished vocabulary is a product of the dominant lenses I call “programming”: prevailing analytical frameworks that artificially narrow corporate law’s scope in ways that misdescribe real-world developments and foreclose normative contestation.

READ MORE »

Delaware Court of Chancery Reinforces Limits on Oversight Liability; Stresses Importance of Conscientious Board Oversight

Sharon L. Nelles, Leonid Traps, and Oliver W. Engebretson-Schooley are Partners at Sullivan & Cromwell LLP. This post is based on a Sullivan & Cromwell memorandum by Ms. Nelles, Mr. Traps, Mr. Engebretson-Schooley, David M.J. Rein, William S.L. Weinberg, and Samuel J. Winick, all at Sullivan & Cromwell LLP; and is part of the Delaware Law Series; links to other posts in the series are available here.

On August 13, 2026, in In re The Boeing Co. Derivative Litigation, Justice Morgan T. Zurn, recently appointed to the Delaware Supreme Court and sitting by designation in the Delaware Court of Chancery, dismissed Caremark failure of oversight claims asserted against current and former directors and employees of The Boeing Company.[1] Granting defendants’ motion to dismiss in full and with prejudice, the Court emphasized the deference accorded to directors of Delaware corporations under the business judgment rule and held that liability under Caremark does not arise where directors reasonably believe they are fulfilling their oversight duties.[2] S&C represents Boeing and the director and employee defendants in the litigation.

READ MORE »

Seven Questions Boards Should Ask After the 2026 Proxy Season

Lee Henderson is the Center for Board Matters Leader and Jamie Smith is the Center for Board Matters Director at EY. This post is based on their EY memorandum.

The proxy landscape is becoming more complex and less predictable.

In brief

  • Regulatory and stewardship shifts are making investor signals harder to read and proxy voting outcomes harder to predict.
  • Boards may need to evaluate whether their oversight structures and disclosures reflect growing expectations around AI governance.
  • Directors should reassess investor engagement strategies, governance practices and board readiness for a rapidly evolving environment.

Headline voting results from the 2026 proxy season reflect relative calm: continued high support for directors, hardly any failed say-on-pay votes and a sharp decline in shareholder proposals reaching the ballot. Yet those results mask a more complex reality.

READ MORE »

Delaware Court of Chancery Examines Fiduciary Duties of PBC Directors in a Change-of-Control Transaction For the First Time

Susan H. Mac Cormac, Michael Santos, and Michael G. O’Bryan are Partners at Morrison & Foerster LLP. This post is based on a MoFo memorandum by Ms. Mac Cormac, Mr. Santos, Mr. O’Bryan, Spencer Klein, Daniel Irvin, and Mariam Zahran, all at Morrison & Foerster LLP; and is part of the Delaware Law Series; links to other posts in the series are available here.

On July 29, 2026, the Delaware Court of Chancery dismissed with prejudice the stockholders’ complaint in Drakes Landing Associates, L.P. v. Tilden Park Capital Management, L.P.,[1] holding that the plaintiffs failed to rebut the statutory safe harbor for directors of a public benefit corporation (PBC). This is the first Delaware Chancery decision to address the balancing test of PBC director fiduciary duties in a change-of-control context.

The dispute arose out of a financing transaction at MPower Financing, PBC, a Delaware PBC (the “Company”), in which two of the Company’s largest lenders obtained control of the Company. The plaintiffs alleged that the special committee formed to evaluate the transaction, although independent and disinterested, nonetheless breached its fiduciary duties and that the lenders aided and abetted the breach. The Court found that the plaintiffs failed to plead facts sufficient to rebut the safe harbor protecting PBC directors under DGCL Section 365(b). The Court also addressed the applicability to PBCs of Revlon, concluding that the duty to maximize the sale price of a corporation does not apply to the conduct of PBC directors, but leaving open the question of whether a modified form of enhanced scrutiny might still apply as a standard of review.

READ MORE »

2026 Board Index Director Snapshot

George Anderson and Rebecca Thornton are both Partners and Co-Leaders of the Board practice at Spencer Stuart. This post is based on a Spencer Stuart memorandum by Mr. Anderson, Ms. Thornton, and Ann Yerger, all at Spencer Stuart.

Class of 2026: S&P 500 boards appoint more CEOs

Board refreshment slows

S&P 500 boards appointed 364 new independent directors in 2026, out of a total of 5,204 — the lowest number of new directors since 2016. Overall turnover remains low, declining from 0.8 new directors per board last year to 0.7 in 2026.

In previous years, declines in director appointments generally mirrored the number of directors leaving boards. For example, 374 directors departed S&P 500 boards in 2024, matching the number of new director appointments in 2025. That pattern did not continue in 2026: 418 directors left boards  last year, 15% higher than this year’s appointments.

READ MORE »

Page 1 of 6
1 2 3 4 5 6