Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation

Statement by Commissioners Lee and Crenshaw on Primary Direct Listings

Today [Dec. 23, 2020], the Commission approved a new listing rule from the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) which fundamentally shifts how companies can access the public markets. The new listing standard will allow primary direct listings of companies seeking to go public and, importantly, raise capital outside of the traditional initial public offering (“IPO”) […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications, Regulators Materials, Securities Regulation, Speeches & Testimony | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Statement by Commissioners Lee and Crenshaw on Primary Direct Listings

Statement by Commissioner Roisman on NYSE Primary Direct Listing Proposal

While many aspects of our equity markets have long benefited from innovation, innovation has managed to elude, to any significant extent, the primary offering process. Until today [Dec. 22, 2020]. NYSE’s proposal would provide an alternative means for companies listed on their exchange to raise equity capital in our public markets. I support the approval […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Institutional Investors, Regulators Materials, Securities Regulation, Speeches & Testimony | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Statement by Commissioner Roisman on NYSE Primary Direct Listing Proposal

Up or Out: Resetting Norms for Peer Reviewed Publishing in the Social Sciences

Papers in economics are three times the length that they were in the 1970s. This does not include internet appendices which push the total length of some papers to more than 100 pages. It takes years from submission to publication. We argue that editorial process in many of the social sciences has become dysfunctional. It […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Empirical Research | Tagged , | Comments Off on Up or Out: Resetting Norms for Peer Reviewed Publishing in the Social Sciences

BlackRock’s 2021 Policy Guidance

Each January, BlackRock typically previews its stewardship priorities in CEO Larry Fink’s annual letter to portfolio companies, followed soon thereafter by updated proxy voting guidelines. Given BlackRock’s position as the world’s largest asset manager, with nearly $8 trillion in assets under management, companies are prepared for this typical release of information. But as one more […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Corporate Elections & Voting, ESG, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on BlackRock’s 2021 Policy Guidance

Appraisal Waivers

Appraisal has long been a controversial topic. The courts have struggled to determine the most appropriate valuation methodology and the extent to which that methodology should depend on vary based on case-specific factors. The Delaware Supreme Court continues to face an active docket of appraisal cases and to resolve them through opinions that are highly […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Mergers & Acquisitions, Securities Litigation & Enforcement | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Appraisal Waivers

Preparing for Shareholder Activism in 2021

Although the level of publicly reported activism has decreased this past year, boards and management teams continue to be occupied by a regular flow of “private” activism—i.e., aggressive non-public, inbound communications calling for changes in strategic direction, operational focus, public commitments to long-term metrics and changes to board and management composition, all made without launching […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, ESG, Institutional Investors, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Preparing for Shareholder Activism in 2021

Shareholder Activism at Closed-End Funds in the Wake of Covid-19

Shareholder activism in the United States and worldwide was noticeably down in 2020 when compared to 2019, and that decline was largely due to the impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. However, for US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) registered closed-end investment funds, COVID-19 had the opposite effect. In the wake of the market dislocations […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Corporate Elections & Voting, Institutional Investors, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Shareholder Activism at Closed-End Funds in the Wake of Covid-19

Preparing Your 2020 Form 20-F

This post highlights some considerations for the preparation of your 2020 annual report on Form 20-F. As in previous years, we discuss both disclosure developments and continued areas of focus for the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). In addition, we highlight certain U.S.-related enforcement matters and other developments of interest to foreign private issuers […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, ESG, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Preparing Your 2020 Form 20-F

A General Defense of Information Fiduciaries

Countless high-profile abuses of user data have put Facebook, Google, and other digital companies within the sights of lawmakers. Across the political spectrum, legislators condemn these firms’ conduct, accusing them of undermining user privacy and data security. Scholars and other commentators seek greater oversight of digital enterprises. In this environment, one especially influential reform proposal […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Boards of Directors, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on A General Defense of Information Fiduciaries

The Big Three and Board Gender Diversity: The Effectiveness of Shareholder Voice

In 2017, “The Big Three” institutional investors (BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard) launched campaigns to increase gender diversity on corporate boards. BlackRock and State Street’s campaigns included policies of voting against directors’ reelection at firms that made insufficient progress toward a gender-diverse board. In our paper, The Big Three and Board Gender Diversity: The Effectiveness […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Empirical Research, ESG, Institutional Investors | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments