Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation

Spencer Stuart S&P MidCap 400 Board Report

Spencer Stuart’s inaugural survey of S&P MidCap 400 companies finds significant differences between mid- and large-cap boards. Not only are mid-cap boards generally smaller in size, younger and less diverse than larger S&P 500 companies, the profiles of directors joining mid-cap boards differ. In some ways, mid-cap boards appear to be casting a wide net […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, ESG, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Spencer Stuart S&P MidCap 400 Board Report

Weekly Roundup: February 4-11, 2021

SEC Adopts Revised Investment Adviser Marketing Rule Posted by Jessica Forbes, Stacey Song, and Joanna D. Rosenberg, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, on Friday, February 5, 2021 Tags: Disclosure, Form ADV, No-action letters, SEC, SEC enforcement, SEC rulemaking, Securities enforcement, Securities regulation, Solicitation Incentive Design Changes in Response to COVID-19: Russell 3000 Posted by Justin Beck and Felipe Rubio, Semler Brossy Consulting Group […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Weekly Roundup | Tagged | Comments Off on Weekly Roundup: February 4-11, 2021

2021 Proxy Season Preview and Shareholder Voting Trends (2017-2020)

2021 Proxy Season Preview and Shareholder Voting Trends (2017-2020) builds on a comprehensive review of resolutions submitted by investors at Russell 3000 companies to provide insights into the new season of annual general meetings (AGMs). The data and analysis include trends in the number and topics of shareholder proposals, the level of support received by […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, ESG, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on 2021 Proxy Season Preview and Shareholder Voting Trends (2017-2020)

Responsible Institutional Investing Around the World

The practice of responsible investing, whereby institutional investors incorporate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues into their investment processes, is becoming increasingly important as evidenced by the growth of the Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) network. Despite the prevalence of PRI signatories in global equity markets (which now manage half of the assets held by […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, ESG, Institutional Investors, International Corporate Governance & Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Responsible Institutional Investing Around the World

Biden Administration Signals Intention To Be Tougher on Corporate Crime

Biden Forecasting the enforcement priorities of the Department of Justice (DOJ) under a new administration is difficult at best. However, the Biden administration is widely expected to be tougher on corporate crime than its predecessor, consistent with the approach of prior Democratic administrations. If that is the case, the DOJ’s policies and priorities over the […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Biden Administration Signals Intention To Be Tougher on Corporate Crime

2021 Proxy Season Preview

As we mark a decade of engaging with investors with this year’s proxy season preview, much has changed in the investor landscape, particularly over the past year of the pandemic. Investors want boards to help companies adapt their strategies for a future in which prioritizing stakeholders and considering environmental and social impacts will be critical […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, ESG, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on 2021 Proxy Season Preview

Making “Stakeholder Capitalism” Work: Contributions from Business & Human Rights

For the first time in nearly a half-century, leading business associations, corporations, and the corporate law and governance community are seriously proclaiming that maximizing shareholder value is no longer adequate as the primary let alone sole purpose of the listed corporation—that the corporation must also benefit and be accountable to its workers, suppliers, consumers, and […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, ESG, International Corporate Governance & Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Making “Stakeholder Capitalism” Work: Contributions from Business & Human Rights

Future-Ready Boards

The competitive landscape in nearly every sector is changing rapidly. You are likely looking for ways to remain relevant and drive your company’s mission while making changes to reflect shifts in society. A future-ready board adds value by augmenting opportunity identification and maintaining its duties to investors and stakeholders. Leadership teams are expected to lead […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, ESG, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Future-Ready Boards

Does Media Coverage Cause Meritorious Shareholder Litigation? Evidence from the Stock Option Backdating Scandal

Our recent paper uses the Wall Street Journal’s coverage of the stock option backdating scandal to examine whether media coverage causes meritorious shareholder litigation. While the media has a prominent role in covering corporate scandals, it is unclear whether the media coverage itself causes any subsequent litigation because the underlying corporate misconduct and firm characteristics […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Empirical Research, Securities Litigation & Enforcement | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Does Media Coverage Cause Meritorious Shareholder Litigation? Evidence from the Stock Option Backdating Scandal

ESG: The S Is Not for Short

Key Takeaways GameStop is a key example of the risks of short selling. Responsible investors take different approaches to the practice. Some avoid taking part, due to concerns related to values and to market integrity. Some have taken advantage of the tool to further their ESG aims. Increased access for retail investors to sophisticated financial […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Derivatives, ESG, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on ESG: The S Is Not for Short