Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation

FSB TCFD Guidance on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures: Regulatory and Market Responses

This post summarizes and comments upon a representative sampling of responses (through September 15, 2017) from financial regulators, issuers, institutional investors, credit rating agencies, and voluntary sustainability reporting frameworks, to the draft Guidance issued on December 14, 2017, and to the final Guidance published on June 29, 2017, by the Financial Stability Board (FSB) Task […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Corporate Social Responsibility, Financial Regulation, Institutional Investors, International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on FSB TCFD Guidance on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures: Regulatory and Market Responses

A Mechanism for LIBOR

The London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) is intended to reflect the average rate at which banks can borrow in the unsecured market. It is computed by taking a trimmed mean of the daily reported borrowing rates of the banks on a panel. But panel banks may have incentives to manipulate LIBOR to profit off of […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Banking & Financial Institutions, Derivatives, Financial Regulation, International Corporate Governance & Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on A Mechanism for LIBOR

Not All TSR Incentive Plans are Created Equal

Over the past few years, relative total shareholder return (TSR) has continued to be the most widely used executive long-term incentive (LTI) plan metric, even though its usage is leveling off to some degree at the CEO level as other incentive plan metrics become more popular. That said, due to its clear connection to shareholder […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Executive Compensation, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Not All TSR Incentive Plans are Created Equal

Post Vote Update: Revisiting the P&G-Trian Contest

Frequently touted for its absolute scale, it seems fitting that the knock-down, drag-out fight between Trian and P&G is slated to continue into extra rounds. Indeed, P&G is the largest firm to ever face a proxy contest, and the cash reportedly invested by the two sides tops all prior campaigns. As widely reported, management’s quick […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Post Vote Update: Revisiting the P&G-Trian Contest

Coordinating Compliance Incentives

The notion that corporations must develop effective ethics and compliance programs is uncontroversial. Earlier this month, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein explained that the “sophistication of compliance measures and tools that we see today regularly exceed the measures that were in place ten years ago.” In part, this increased sophistication may be credited to the […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Accounting & Disclosure, Securities Litigation & Enforcement | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Coordinating Compliance Incentives

SEC’s Proposed Modernization of Regulation S-K

On October 11, 2017, at the first open meeting under Chairman Jay Clayton’s tenure, the SEC proposed amendments to modernize and simplify certain disclosure requirements in Regulation S-K. The proposed amendments are largely consistent with the recommendations in the SEC’s FAST Act Report to Congress in November 2016 (the “Report”).  The rulemaking proposal is intended […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Legislative & Regulatory Developments, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on SEC’s Proposed Modernization of Regulation S-K

Weekly Roundup: October 20–26, 2017

Securities Cases to Watch this Term at the Supreme Court Posted by Brad S. Karp, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, on Friday, October 20, 2017 Tags: Class actions, Dodd-Frank Act, Fraud-on-the-Market, Rule 10b-5, Section 10(b), Securities enforcement, Securities fraud, Securities litigation, Securities regulation, SLUSA, Supreme Court, Whistleblowers Director Networks, Turnover, and Appointments Posted by Luc Renneboog, Tilburg University, and Yang Zhao, Newcastle University, on Friday, October 20, […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Weekly Roundup | Tagged | Comments Off on Weekly Roundup: October 20–26, 2017

Environmental and Social Proposals in the 2017 Proxy Season

The Conference Board recently released a report that reviews the key environmental and social (E&S) proposals in the 2017 proxy season. The report provides details on some of the most prominent topics, including topics which received high levels of shareholder support and topics that have seen notable changes in support levels compared to previous years. […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Corporate Elections & Voting, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Environmental and Social Proposals in the 2017 Proxy Season

The Hart-Scott-Rodino Act’s First Amendment Problem

The Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act (“HSR Act”) is a centerpiece of federal antitrust law. Designed to aid enforcement of Clayton Act Section 7, which prohibits mergers and acquisitions that “may … substantially … lessen competition” or “tend to create a monopoly,” the statute requires the prospective acquirer of an issuer’s voting securities exceeding a certain […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Accounting & Disclosure, Institutional Investors, Mergers & Acquisitions, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Hart-Scott-Rodino Act’s First Amendment Problem

FPI Director Oversight over Related Party Transactions

Investors and regulators in the current corporate governance environment have increased their focus on companies’ transactions with their directors, senior management, and other related persons. These related-party transactions raise special disclosure issues for non-US companies, known as foreign private issuers (FPIs), that are listed on US stock exchanges. FPIs may engage in related-party transactions that […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Boards of Directors, International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on FPI Director Oversight over Related Party Transactions