-
Supported By:
Subscribe or Follow
Program on Corporate Governance Advisory Board
- Peter Atkins
- David Bell
- Kerry E. Berchem
- Richard Brand
- Daniel Burch
- Paul Choi
- Jesse Cohn
- Arthur B. Crozier
- Renata J. Ferrari
- Andrew Freedman
- Ray Garcia
- Byron Georgiou
- Joseph Hall
- Jason M. Halper William P. Mills
- David Millstone
- Theodore Mirvis
- Philip Richter
- Elina Tetelbaum
- Sebastian Tiller
- Marc Trevino
- Steven J. Williams
HLS Faculty & Senior Fellows
Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation
What Do Measures of Real-Time Corporate Sales Tell Us About Earnings Surprises and Post-Announcement Returns?
The information asymmetry around earnings announcements has long been the center of finance and accounting research. At the time of an earnings announcement, managers have information not only about their firm’s performance over the last quarter (“within quarter”) but also about performance since the quarter-end (“post quarter”). The announced numbers and the disclosures they rely […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Accounting & Disclosure, Empirical Research
Tagged Accounting, Conflicts of interest, Earnings announcements, Financial reporting, Information asymmetries, Information environment, Inside information, Management, Market efficiency, Market reaction
Comments Off on What Do Measures of Real-Time Corporate Sales Tell Us About Earnings Surprises and Post-Announcement Returns?
The Value of the Shareholder Proposal Process
Early in June, the House of Representatives passed a piece of legislation, dubbed the Financial CHOICE Act, which would gut much of Dodd-Frank. One of its provisions would make it impossible for all but the largest investors to file shareholder proposals by requiring that investors must hold at least one percent of the outstanding shares […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Institutional Investors, Legislative & Regulatory Developments, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation
Tagged Boards of Directors, Business Roundtable, CHOICE Act, Climate change, Diversity, ESG, Institutional Investors, Political spending, Securities regulation, Shareholder proposals, Shareholder rights, Shareholder voting
1 Comment
U.S. Supreme Court Rules That Class Action Tolling Does Not Apply to Statutes of Repose
On June 26, 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court decided in California Public Employees’ Retirement System v. ANZ Securities, Inc., No. 16-373 (U.S.), that the class action tolling doctrine established in American Pipe & Construction Co. v. Utah, 414 U.S. 538 (1974), does not extend to the three-year statute of repose under Section 13 of the […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement, Securities Regulation
Tagged CalPERS, Class actions, Institutional Investors, Section 11, Securities litigation, Securities regulation, Settlements, Shareholder suits, Statute of limitations, Supreme Court, Tolling
Comments Off on U.S. Supreme Court Rules That Class Action Tolling Does Not Apply to Statutes of Repose
Lawyer CEOs
We contribute to the literature on the value of CEOs with specialized professional skills by examining the effect of CEOs with law degrees on corporate litigation. We hypothesized that the combination of legal training and acquired risk aversion makes lawyer CEOs effective at managing corporate litigation risk. We identify the educational background of about 3,500 […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Empirical Research
Tagged Commercial litigation, Executive value, Inside counsel, Management, Manager characteristics, Managerial style, Oversight, Risk management, Risk oversight, Securities litigation
Comments Off on Lawyer CEOs
Appraisal Practice Points Post-SWS
As we discussed in our post last week, the Delaware Court of Chancery, in its SWS decision issued May 30, 2017, relying on a discounted cash flow analysis, determined that the appraised “fair value” of SWS Group, Inc. (the “Company”) was 7.8% below the merger price paid by the acquiror, Hilltop Holdings, Inc. In our study of appraisal decisions since […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Arbitrage, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Fair values, Fairness review, Leverage, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions
Comments Off on Appraisal Practice Points Post-SWS
Second Circuit Rejects Shaw‘s “Extreme Departure Test”
[On June 21] in Stadnick v. Vivint Solar, the Second Circuit provided important guidance for determining when an omission in a registration statement is material for purposes of a Section 11 claim. The decision holds that the materiality of an omission is not determined by asking whether the omitted information constitutes an “extreme departure from the range of results […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Court Cases, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement, Securities Regulation
Tagged Accounting, Disclosure, Financial reporting, Misreporting, Section 11, Securities enforcement, Securities litigation, U.S. federal courts
Comments Off on Second Circuit Rejects Shaw‘s “Extreme Departure Test”
2017 Proxy Season Review
Amid regulatory and legislative uncertainty, investors remain committed to holding boards, and themselves, to higher levels of accountability, transparency and engagement. The 2017 proxy season is marked by the launch of a historic US stewardship code and the emergence of proxy access as standard practice across large companies. These developments unite many leading investors behind […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Board composition, Boards of Directors, Climate change, Diversity, Engagement, Environmental disclosure, ESG, Institutional Investors, Proxy access, Proxy season, Proxy voting, Shareholder proposals, Stewardship, Sustainability
1 Comment
How Your Board Can Be Ready for Crisis
Most companies experience at least one crisis every four or five years. Regularly discussing the crisis plan with management and the results from testing it lets the board understand where there might be gaps in readiness. And it’s always better to know about those gaps before a crisis hits. Directors themselves might even need to […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Board monitoring, Boards of Directors, Cybersecurity, Management, Oversight, Reputation, Risk, Risk management, Risk oversight
Comments Off on How Your Board Can Be Ready for Crisis
The Law & Brexit XII
On June 23, 2017, we passed the one year mark since the referendum on the UK’s membership of the EU. Although certainty on the eventual consequences of that decision is in short supply, the UK and the EU finally began the Brexit negotiation process in Brussels. The unexpected result of the June general election in […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Banking & Financial Institutions, Derivatives, Financial Regulation, International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Banks, Brexit, Clearing houses, Derivatives, ESMA, EU, Europe, Financial institutions, Financial regulation, International governance, Oversight, Systemic risk, UK
Comments Off on The Law & Brexit XII