-
Supported By:
Subscribe or Follow
Program on Corporate Governance Advisory Board
- Peter Atkins
- David Bell
- Kerry E. Berchem
- Richard Brand
- Daniel Burch
- Paul Choi
- Jesse Cohn
- Arthur B. Crozier Christine Davine
- Renata J. Ferrari
- Andrew Freedman
- Ray Garcia
- Byron Georgiou
- Joseph Hall
- Jason M. Halper William P. Mills
- David Millstone
- Theodore Mirvis
- Philip Richter
- Elina Tetelbaum
- Sebastian Tiller
- Marc Trevino Jonathan Watkins
- Steven J. Williams
HLS Faculty & Senior Fellows
Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation
U.S. Proxy Season Half-Time Update
With peak meeting day in the rear-view window and wrapping up the last of the four busiest meeting days of the year today, more and more issuers are reporting their meeting results—and it’s time to take stock of what the numbers are telling us. Through today and among Russell 3000 companies, ISS has issued recommendations […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Executive Compensation, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Boards of Directors, Disclosure, ESG, Executive Compensation, Institutional Investors, Say on frequency, Say on pay, Shareholder proposals, Shareholder voting, Sustainability
Comments Off on U.S. Proxy Season Half-Time Update
Clarity on the “Quasi-Appraisal” Remedy and Post-Closing Claims
On May 11, 2017, Chancellor Andre G. Bouchard of the Delaware Court of Chancery issued another noteworthy opinion, dismissing with prejudice post-closing merger claims in In re Cyan, Inc. Stockholders Litigation. The case arose out of the August 2015 acquisition of Cyan, Inc., a networking solutions company, by Ciena Corporation through a mostly stock-for-stock transaction, […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Court Cases, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Boards of Directors, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Disclosure, Fiduciary duties, Liability standards, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Shareholder suits
Comments Off on Clarity on the “Quasi-Appraisal” Remedy and Post-Closing Claims
Dancing with Activists
We recently released a study, entitled Dancing with Activists, that focuses on “settlement” agreements between activist hedge funds and target companies. Using a comprehensive hand-collected data set, we provide the first systematic analysis of the drivers, nature, and consequences of such settlement agreements. Our study identifies the determinants of settlements, showing that settlements are more likely […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Boards of Directors, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Empirical Research
Tagged Board composition, Board turnover, Boards of Directors, Executive performance, Executive turnover, Firm performance, Hedge funds, Ousting directors, Proxy fights, Proxy voting, Rent-seeking, Settlements, Shareholder activism, Target firms
Comments Off on Dancing with Activists
Cybersecurity Must Be High on the Board Agenda
Recent global cyberattacks have rudely reminded corporate America that cybersecurity risk management must be at the top of the board of directors’ corporate governance agenda. Companies have no choice but to prepare proactively, while directors must understand the nature of cybersecurity risk and prioritize its oversight. Preparation, monitoring, emergency response, and disclosure are topics that […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Boards of Directors, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation
Tagged Board communication, Boards of Directors, Compliance & ethics, Cybersecurity, Disclosure, Risk committee, Risk disclosure, Risk management, Risk oversight, SEC, Securities regulation
Comments Off on Cybersecurity Must Be High on the Board Agenda
M&A Deal Terms in 2017: What Can Deal Teams Expect?
Britain’s decision to leave the European Union in June 2016, coupled with the election of Donald Trump as US president in November 2016, gave dealmakers plenty of pause for thought last year—but ultimately did little to derail strategic M&A. Encouraged by the post-Brexit decline in the value of sterling and supported by the continuing availability […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Acquisition agreements, Cross-border transactions, Deal protection, EU, Europe, International governance, Leveraged acquisitions, Mergers & acquisitions, Taxation, UK
Comments Off on M&A Deal Terms in 2017: What Can Deal Teams Expect?
The Origins of Corporate Social Responsibility
The area of corporate social responsibility is awash in rhetoric. Although most corporate managers and business advisors agree that engaging in socially responsible behavior is the correct thing for businesses to do, few can articulate a strong analytical foundation for this belief. The fact that engaging in this type of behavior may help to make […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Accounting & Disclosure, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Corporate Social Responsibility
Tagged Compliance & ethics, Corporate forms, Corporate Social Responsibility, Disclosure, Duty of good faith, ESG, Stakeholders
Comments Off on The Origins of Corporate Social Responsibility
Potential Regulatory Relief—Financial CHOICE Act 2.0
On May 4, 2017, the U.S. House of Representatives Financial Services Committee voted to advance the Financial CHOICE (“Creating Hope and Opportunity for Investors, Consumers, and Entrepreneurs”) Act (Version 2.0) to the House of Representatives for further consideration and a vote. The CHOICE Act is designed to rewrite many of the rules and provisions contained […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Executive Compensation, Legislative & Regulatory Developments, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation
Tagged CHOICE Act, Clawbacks, Compensation disclosure, Compensation ratios, Dodd-Frank Act, Executive Compensation, Incentives, Management, Say on pay, Securities regulation
Comments Off on Potential Regulatory Relief—Financial CHOICE Act 2.0
Financial Scholars Oppose Eliminating “Orderly Liquidation Authority” As Crisis-Avoidance Restructuring Backstop
Earlier this week, Jeff Gordon and I wrote to the chairs and ranking members of the Senate and House Banking and Judiciary committees, analyzing reasons why a bankruptcy structure should not be allowed to substitute for the Dodd-Frank Act’s regulator-driven “orderly liquidation authority.” Our letter was joined by more than 100 other academics whose work and teaching […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Banking & Financial Institutions, Bankruptcy & Financial Distress, Financial Crisis, Financial Regulation, HLS Research, Legislative & Regulatory Developments
Tagged Bankruptcy, CHOICE Act, Dodd-Frank Act, FDIC, Financial crisis, Financial institutions, Financial regulation, Liquidation, Restructurings, SIFIs, Systemic risk
Comments Off on Financial Scholars Oppose Eliminating “Orderly Liquidation Authority” As Crisis-Avoidance Restructuring Backstop