-
Supported By:
Subscribe or Follow
HLS Faculty & Senior Fellows
Program on Corporate Governance Advisory Board
- Peter Atkins
- David Bell
- Kerry E. Berchem
- Richard Brand
- Daniel Burch
- Paul Choi
- Jesse Cohn
- Arthur B. Crozier
- Renata J. Ferrari
- Andrew Freedman
- Ray Garcia
- Joseph Hall
- Jason M. Halper William P. Mills
- David Millstone
- Theodore Mirvis
- Philip Richter
- Elina Tetelbaum
- Sebastian Tiller
- Marc Trevino
- Steven J. Williams
Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation
The Consequences of Managerial Indiscretions
In 2012, the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported that Scott Thompson, Yahoo’s CEO, allegedly lied about obtaining a computer science degree. In 2007, the WSJ reported that Chris Albrecht, the head of Time Warner’s HBO unit, allegedly assaulted his girlfriend outside a Las Vegas casino following the Oscar De La Hoya v. Floyd Mayweather Jr. […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Accounting & Disclosure, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Empirical Research
Tagged Compliance & ethics, Executive performance, Executive turnover, Firm performance, Firm valuation, Information environment, Management, Manager characteristics, Market reaction, Misconduct, Reputation, Shareholder value, Signaling
Comments Off on The Consequences of Managerial Indiscretions
Texas Bill Targets Activist Investors, Advisors
Regulations proposed by the Texas State Legislature would mark a blow to shareholder rights, subjecting investors, proxy advisors and other shareholder support firms to unprecedented disclosure requirements, and potentially serving to reverse the recent expansion of proxy access. Texas House Bill 2382 would require “activist investors” in Texas-based public companies to register with the state’s […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Institutional Investors, Legislative & Regulatory Developments, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Beneficial owners, Boards of Directors, Disclosure, Proxy access, Proxy advisors, Schedule 13D, Shareholder activism, Shareholder nominations, Shareholder rights, State law, Stewardship, Texas
1 Comment
Five Investor Trends Driving Say on Pay in 2017
Although the strong stock market in 2017 has provided a helpful start to the year for many companies, it has not curtailed investor focus on improving the corporate governance practices—from sustainability to board composition—of their portfolio companies. With 2017 annual meeting results already rolling in, early data suggests that one perennial topic remains top of […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Executive Compensation, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Boards of Directors, Compensation disclosure, Engagement, ESG, Executive Compensation, Firm performance, Incentives, Institutional Investors, Management, Performance measures, Proxy advisors, Proxy season, Say on pay, TSR
Comments Off on Five Investor Trends Driving Say on Pay in 2017
Shareholder Wealth Effects of Border Adjustment Taxation
We examine the effects of a proposed border adjustment tax (also referred to as the “BAT”) on the shareholder wealth of publicly traded firms. Border adjustment has emerged as a controversial feature of proposed U.S. corporate tax reform, as it would be a dramatic departure from longstanding corporate tax policy (Avi-Yonah and Clausing 2017; Auerbach […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Accounting & Disclosure, Empirical Research, International Corporate Governance & Regulation
Tagged Accounting, BAT, Cross-border transactions, Donald Trump, International governance, Market reaction, Shareholder value, Stock returns, Taxation
Comments Off on Shareholder Wealth Effects of Border Adjustment Taxation
Insider Trading: When Hackers Target Corporate Shares
When data breaches target credit card numbers and personal information, the damage can be quantified, however when hackers explicitly target a company’s shares that damage is much more unpredictable. Insider-Trading hacks are akin to coming home to find your house has been (somewhat silently) broken into—but was anything stolen? And how long will it take […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement
Tagged Cybersecurity, D&O insurance, Financial reporting, Information asymmetries, Information environment, Inside information, Insider trading, Privacy, Risk, Risk oversight, Securities litigation
Comments Off on Insider Trading: When Hackers Target Corporate Shares
Expanding the Reach of the Commodity Exchange Act’s Antitrust Considerations
In recent years, a small group of financial institutions have paid billions of dollars to settle civil and criminal claims that they formed cartels to rig the prices of certain critically important financial instruments and to stifle competition in others. For example, bankers would rig global benchmark interest rates, such as the London Interbank Offered […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Banking & Financial Institutions, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Derivatives, Financial Regulation
Tagged Antitrust, Banks, CFTC, Derivatives, Dodd-Frank Act, Financial institutions, Financial regulation, Misconduct, OTC derivatives, Securities fraud, Swaps, Swaps entities
Comments Off on Expanding the Reach of the Commodity Exchange Act’s Antitrust Considerations
Roadblocks to Redemption: Delaware Chancery Court Makes Preferred Stock Redemptions More Challenging
A recent decision in Delaware illustrates yet another difficulty investors face when using redemption of their stock as a liquidity strategy. In this case, a private equity fund, Oak Hill Capital Partners, and the directors of one of its portfolio companies (both outsiders and those designated by the fund) were sued for breach of fiduciary […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Court Cases, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications, Private Equity, Securities Litigation & Enforcement
Tagged Boards of Directors, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Fiduciary duties, Liability standards, Liquidity, Private equity, Private funds, Restructurings, Securities litigation, Shareholder suits, Shareholder voting
Comments Off on Roadblocks to Redemption: Delaware Chancery Court Makes Preferred Stock Redemptions More Challenging
What Drives Differences in Management?
The focus of good corporate governance is making sure executives run their firms well. But how do we define success? One way is to look at performance in terms of profits, stock-prices or growth. But all these measures have a major component of luck and may be very poor signals of managerial quality. As any […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Empirical Research
Tagged Corporate culture, Executive performance, Human capital, Labor markets, Management, Managerial style, Peer groups, Shareholder value, State law
Comments Off on What Drives Differences in Management?
Weekly Roundup: May 5–May 11, 2017
Corporate Governance in the Trump Era: A Note of Caution Posted by William R. McLucas and Rachel Murphy, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, on Friday, May 5, 2017 Tags: Accounting, Banks, Deregulation, Disclosure, Donald Trump, FCPA, Financial crisis, Financial institutions, Financial regulation, Insider trading, Misconduct, Savings and loans, SEC enforcement, Securities enforcement The […]
Click here to read the complete post