-
Supported By:
Subscribe or Follow
Program on Corporate Governance Advisory Board
- Peter Atkins
- David Bell
- Kerry E. Berchem
- Richard Brand
- Daniel Burch
- Paul Choi
- Jesse Cohn
- Arthur B. Crozier
- Renata J. Ferrari
- Andrew Freedman
- Ray Garcia
- Byron Georgiou
- Joseph Hall
- Jason M. Halper William P. Mills
- David Millstone
- Theodore Mirvis
- Philip Richter
- Elina Tetelbaum
- Sebastian Tiller
- Marc Trevino
- Steven J. Williams
HLS Faculty & Senior Fellows
Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation
Lessons Beyond Corwin: Columbia Pipeline and Saba Software
Two recent decisions from the Delaware Court of Chancery faithfully apply the Delaware Supreme Court’s holding in Corwin v. KKR Financial Holdings LLC. No surprise there. Corwin held that when “a transaction not subject to the entire fairness standard is approved by a fully informed, uncoerced vote of the disinterested stockholders, the business judgment rule […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Business judgment rule, Conflicts of interest, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Disclosure, Fiduciary duties, Financial advisers, In re Revlon, Liability standards, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions
Comments Off on Lessons Beyond Corwin: Columbia Pipeline and Saba Software
Financial Markets and the Political Center of Gravity
In Financial Markets and the Political Center of Gravity, Travis Coan and I investigate the link between left-right market-friendliness across the developed world and financial markets. Academics across multiple disciplines and policymakers in multiple institutions have in recent decades searched for the economic, political, and institutional foundations for financial market strength. Promising theories and empirics […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Empirical Research, Financial Regulation, HLS Research, International Corporate Governance & Regulation
Tagged Agency costs, Capital markets, Deregulation, Financial reform, Financial regulation, International governance, Legal systems
Comments Off on Financial Markets and the Political Center of Gravity
Guarding Against Challenges to Director Equity Compensation
There has been an emerging litigation trend in Delaware, where most U.S. public companies are incorporated, alleging that directors breached their fiduciary duties and committed waste of corporate assets in granting themselves excessive awards under the company’s equity compensation plan. Because directors have a direct interest in their own pay, Delaware courts have held that […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Court Cases, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Agency costs, Boards of Directors, Business judgment rule, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Director compensation, Director liability, Fiduciary duties, Say on pay, Securities litigation, Shareholder suits, Shareholder voting
1 Comment
Saving Investors from Themselves: How Stockholder Primacy Harms Everyone
Communities around the world face many difficult issues, including poverty, climate change, social and economic inequality, the cost and quality of education and healthcare, stagnant wages, financial market instability, disease, and food security. Despite the existential threat that these concerns may raise, there is no consensus on whether or how to address them through regulation, […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Accounting & Disclosure, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Corporate Social Responsibility
Tagged Accountability, Benefit corporation, Compliance & ethics, Corporate forms, Corporate Social Responsibility, Disclosure, ESG, Firm performance, Reputation, Shareholder primacy, Shareholder value, Stakeholders, Sustainability
Comments Off on Saving Investors from Themselves: How Stockholder Primacy Harms Everyone
Delaware and Santa Fe
The U.S. Supreme Court’s 1977 decision in Santa Fe Industries v. Green drew a line between corporate and securities law that arguably enabled Delaware to become the leading creator of corporate law. Prior to Santa Fe, the federal courts had become receptive to suits brought under Rule 10b-5 alleging corporate misconduct rather than a clear […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Court Cases, Securities Litigation & Enforcement, Securities Regulation
Tagged Business judgment rule, Delaware articles, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Disclosure, Fairness review, Rule 10b-5, Securities fraud, Securities litigation, Securities regulation, Shareholder suits, State law, Supreme Court
Comments Off on Delaware and Santa Fe
California District Court: Indirect Purchasers Can Bring Fraud Claims Against Private Company
In a case with important implications for late-stage private companies, a federal magistrate judge ruled last week that investors in funds holding private company securities can bring fraud claims against the issuer of the securities and its officers, even though the plaintiffs had no dealings with the issuer or its officers and hold no actual […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement
Tagged Corporate fraud, Liability standards, Misconduct, Private firms, Securities fraud, Tech companies
Comments Off on California District Court: Indirect Purchasers Can Bring Fraud Claims Against Private Company
Past, Present and Future Compensation Research: Economist Perspectives
At the 2016 Academy of Management conference, a group of leading human resource scholars held a panel discussion assessing the state of compensation research, which was subsequently published in Compensation and Benefits Review [CBR]. Afterwards, CBR editor Charles Fay asked me to organize a panel discussion of economists on the same topic. This seems a […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Accounting & Disclosure, Executive Compensation
Tagged Accounting, Behavioral finance, Executive Compensation, Executive performance, Incentives, Management, Pay for performance, Performance measures, Risk management
Comments Off on Past, Present and Future Compensation Research: Economist Perspectives
CHOICE Act 2.0: House Financial Services Committee Revises Regulatory Reform Bill
On April 19, 2017, the House Financial Services Committee (the “Committee”) released a new “discussion draft” of the Financial CHOICE Act, its comprehensive regulatory reform bill (“CHOICE Act 2.0”). The Committee released the first version of the bill (“CHOICE Act 1.0”) in June 2016. Buoyed by the election of a Republican president, and following several […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Banking & Financial Institutions, Financial Regulation, Legislative & Regulatory Developments, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation
Tagged Banks, Capital formation, CFPB, CFTC, CHOICE Act, Consumer protection, Dodd-Frank Act, Donald Trump, Financial institutions, Financial reform, Financial regulation, Investor protection, Securities regulation, Stress tests, Too big to fail, Volcker Rule
Comments Off on CHOICE Act 2.0: House Financial Services Committee Revises Regulatory Reform Bill