Monthly Archives: October 2018

Weekly Roundup: October 5-11, 2018


More from:

This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of October 5-11, 2018.



The Board’s Role in Confronting Crisis


How to Fire an Accused CEO: Moonves Departs CBS




The MAC Is Back


Cashing It In: Private-Company Exchanges and Employee Stock Sales Prior to IPO



Director Skills: Diversity of Thought and Experience in the Boardroom


Analysts’ Stock Ownership and Stock Recommendations


The Tesla/Musk Settlements


Activism: The State of Play



The Modern Corporation and Private Property Revisited: Gardiner Means and the Administered Price

William W. Bratton is the Nicholas F. Gallicchio Professor of Law and Co-Director of the Institute for Law & Economics at the University of Pennsylvania Law School. This post is based on a recent paper by Professor Bratton.

My paper, The Modern Corporation and Private Property Revisited: Gardiner Means and the Administered Price, prepared for the Berle X conference at Seattle Law School, views the famous book from its junior coauthor’s perspective. It is a project that began with a memory. Back in 1982, the Hoover Institute at Stanford sponsored a conference on The Modern Corporation on the occasion of its fiftieth anniversary. The apparent objective was to bury the book as a living policy statement. Luminaries of economic theory of the firm presented: Demsetz, Fama, Jensen, Stigler, and Williamson, among others. Their papers, collected in the Journal of Law & Economics in 1983, remain essential reading.

Means, the surviving co-author and then well into his 80s, appeared at the conference and contributed a paper and a comment to the collection, writings that I found somewhat mystifying when I first read them back in the mid-1980s. Everybody else at the conference addressed microeconomics and governance, talking past Means; Means in turn talked past them, going on about macroeconomics and product pricing, repeating old points in a hostile environment populated by a new and different generation, a generation just then hitting its stride as a force in public policy. I came away wondering whether he should have turned down the invitation, for it looked as if he had played into the hands of hostile conference organizers with shopworn, irrelevant contributions. That read lingered in my memory.

READ MORE »

Corporate Governance Features in the Energy Sector

Ed Batts is partner and Sara Gates is an associate at Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP. This post is based on an Orrick memorandum by Mr. Batts and Ms. Gates.

Corporate governance features have become increasingly prominent for public companies. This has accelerated as economic-oriented activist investors team with institutional investors to serve as catalysts for change.

We are often asked by clients in the course of our practice:

What do other companies do?

We thought it would be useful to compare the three primary governance documents—the certificate/articles of incorporation, bylaws and corporate governance guidelines—of publicly traded companies in the energy sector.

We focused on three general areas:

  • Board of Directors
  • Stockholder Actions
  • General Provisions

READ MORE »

Activism: The State of Play

Martin Lipton is a founding partner of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, specializing in mergers and acquisitions and matters affecting corporate policy and strategy. This post is based on a Wachtell Lipton memorandum authored by Mr. Lipton and Zachary S. PodolskyRelated research from the Program on Corporate Governance includes The Long-Term Effects of Hedge Fund Activism by Lucian Bebchuk, Alon Brav, and Wei Jiang (discussed on the Forum here); Dancing with Activists by Lucian Bebchuk, Alon Brav, Wei Jiang, and Thomas Keusch (discussed on the Forum here); and Who Bleeds When the Wolves Bite? A Flesh-and-Blood Perspective on Hedge Fund Activism and Our Strange Corporate Governance System by Leo E. Strine, Jr. (discussed on the Forum here).

As we approach the 2019 proxy season, developments since September 2017 prompt a brief updated review of the state of play.

  • The threat of activism remains high, and has become increasingly global.
  • Activist assets under management remain at elevated levels, encouraging continued attacks on many large successful companies in the U.S. and abroad.
  • In the current robust M&A environment, deal-related activism is prevalent, with activists instigating deal activity, challenging announced transactions (e.g., the “bumpitrage” strategy of pressing for a price increase) and/or pressuring the target into a merger or a private equity deal with the activist itself.
  • “Short” activists, who seek to profit from a decline in the target’s market value, are increasingly aggressive in both the equity and corporate debt markets.
  • Activists continue to garner extensive coverage in both the business and broader press, including a lengthy profile of Paul Singer and Elliott Management in an August New Yorker article, “Paul Singer, Doomsday Investor”. “Singer has excelled in this field in part because of a canny ability to discern his opponents’ weaknesses and a seeming imperviousness to public disapproval.”
  • Momentum for enhanced ESG disclosures is growing. The Coalition for Inclusive Capitalism continues to study ways to measure long-term sustainable value creation that will demonstrate the value companies create beyond financial results. Embankment Project for Inclusive Capitalism. And earlier this month, two prominent business law professors, supported by investors and other entities with over $5 trillion in assets under management, filed a petition for rulemaking calling for the SEC to “develop a comprehensive framework requiring issuers to disclose identified environmental, social, and governance (ESG) aspects of each public-reporting company’s operations.”
  • In turn, activists have sought to enhance their profile among governance professionals, passive institutional investors and ESG-oriented investors, e.g., JANA Partners’ “impact investing” fund which has partnered with CalSTRS to request that Apple address overuse of its devices among youth, and Elliott Management’s “Head of Investment Stewardship” position, highlighted in an October 8, 2018 Wall Street Journal article.
  • An important new study by Ed deHaan, David Larcker and Charles McClure, Long-Term Economic Consequences of Hedge Fund Activist Interventions, has found that on a value weighted basis, long-term returns are “insignificantly different from zero.”
  • Gender diversity has become an increasingly prominent focus in the corporate governance conversation, with California recently becoming the first state to enact legislation instituting gender quotas for boards of directors of public companies headquartered in the state. In the current climate, it is prudent for public companies to work toward developing policies to promote equality in the workplace and ensure appropriate disclosure and shareholder engagement in that regard.

READ MORE »

The Tesla/Musk Settlements

P.J. Himelfarb is partner and Alicia Alterbaum is an associate at Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP. This post is based on their Weil memorandum. Related research from the Program on Corporate Governance includes Independent Directors and Controlling Shareholders by Lucian Bebchuk and Assaf Hamdani (discussed on the Forum here).

On Saturday [September 29, 2018], the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) reached startling and swift settlements with Tesla and Tesla CEO and Chairman, Elon Musk. The settlements, which remain subject to court approval, came just two days after filing suit against Musk and on the same day suit was filed against Tesla for: in the case of Musk, securities fraud under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) and Rule 10b-5 thereunder and, in the case of Tesla, failing to have disclosure controls and procedures relating to Musk’s tweets. Perhaps most notably, the lawsuit against Musk, if not settled, could have led to a complete bar from Musk serving as an officer or director of a public company in the future. Together with the SEC guidance from 2008, available here, and from the Spring of 2013, available here, the latter of which was issued after the Netflix CEO’s use of his personal Facebook page to announce material information about Netflix, this development is an important reminder that use of social media as a primary means to distribute material news about a company can be dangerous without careful application of a well-designed set of disclosure controls and procedures and must be carefully vetted. This is also a reminder that an essential component of such controls and procedures is rigorous oversight of all communications of material information about the company. Otherwise, companies run the risk that the SEC, via its enforcement powers, itself will impose corporate governance reforms.

READ MORE »

Analysts’ Stock Ownership and Stock Recommendations

Yong Yu is Professor at the McCombs School of Business at the University of Texas at Austin. This post is based on a recent article, forthcoming in the Journal of Accounting and Economics, by Professor Yu; Jesse Chan, Ph.D. student at the McCombs School of Business at the University of Texas at Austin; Steve W.J. Lin, Knight Ridder Eminent Scholar Chair in Accounting at Florida International University; and Wuyang Zhao, Assistant Professor at the McCombs School of Business at the University of Texas at Austin.

Financial analysts’ stock ownership in the companies they cover has long been controversial. Regulators and the financial press have repeatedly pointed to analysts’ stock ownership as a potential source of conflicts of interest and have publicly warned investors that analysts’ stock ownership can impair the objectivity of their recommendations. According to this view, analysts’ stock ownership directly links analysts’ personal wealth to their own recommendations, creating a conflict of interest between their responsibility to provide clients with unbiased recommendations and their incentive to maximize the value of their own investments. However, proponents of analysts’ stock ownership stress that analysts’ stock ownership can enhance the credibility of their recommendations by putting their money where their mouth is. In line with these competing views, investors’ opinions differ greatly. Brokers also vary substantially in their policies, with some banning analysts’ stock ownership altogether while others allow or even encourage it.

READ MORE »

Director Skills: Diversity of Thought and Experience in the Boardroom

Anthony Garcia is Associate Vice President at ISS Custom Research. This post is based on an ISS memorandum by Mr. Garcia.

While Mike D of the Beastie Boys was “bustin’ out trap kits” to demonstrate his skill as a rapper, nominating committees were more focused on the education, background, and experiences of potential candidates for the board of directors. And while this approach yields sufficiently qualified board candidates, boards may benefit from taking a closer look at the particular set of skills that a director would bring to the board, or in Mike D’s terms, what skills will pay the bills.

The questions are: what are those skills, and, perhaps more importantly, do those skills translate to better practices at the company? In looking at the role of the board in terms of (1) serving as the fiduciary to shareholders and (2) adopting policies to oversee risk, an increase in the number of unique skills in the boardroom translates to better board practices on governance, environmental, and social issues.

READ MORE »

Petition to SEC for Rulemaking on Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Disclosure

Cynthia A. Williams is the Osler Chair in Business Law at Osgoode Hall Law School at York University. Jill E. Fisch is the Saul A. Fox Distinguished Professor of Business Law at the University of Pennsylvania Law School. This post is based on a petition for a rulemaking on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure authored by Professor Williams and Professor Fisch and signed by investors and associated organizations representing more than $5 trillion in assets under management.

We respectfully submit this petition for rulemaking pursuant to Rule 192(a) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) Rule of Practice.

Today, investors, including retail investors, are demanding and using a wide range of information designed to understand the long-term performance and risk management strategies of public-reporting companies. In response to changing business norms and pressure from investors, most of America’s largest public companies are attempting to provide additional information to meet these changing needs and to address worldwide investor preferences and regulatory requirements. Without adequate standards, more and more public companies are voluntarily producing “sustainability reports” designed to explain how they are creating long-term value. There are substantial problems with the nature, timing, and extent of these voluntary disclosures, however. Thus, we respectfully ask the Commission to engage in notice and comment rule-making to develop a comprehensive framework for clearer, more consistent, more complete, and more easily comparable information relevant to companies’ long-term risks and performance. Such a framework would better inform investors, and would provide clarity to America’s public companies on providing relevant, auditable, and decision-useful information to investors. READ MORE »

Cashing It In: Private-Company Exchanges and Employee Stock Sales Prior to IPO

David F. Larcker is James Irvin Miller Professor of Accounting at Stanford Graduate School of Business; Brian Tayan is a Researcher with the Corporate Governance Research Initiative at Stanford Graduate School of Business; and Edward Watts is a Ph.D. student at Stanford Graduate School of Business. This post is based on their recent paperRelated research from the Program on Corporate Governance includes Carrots & Sticks: How VCs Induce Entrepreneurial Teams to Sell Startups, by Jesse Fried and Brian Broughman (discussed on the Forum here).

We recently published a paper on SSRN, Cashing It In: Private-Company Exchanges and Employee Stock Sales Prior to IPO, that examines the practice of allowing the employees of private companies to sell vested equity awards prior to IPO and the features of private-company marketplaces that have arisen in recent years to facilitate transactions with investors interested in purchasing shares of these companies. We rely on two unique data sets: a survey of private (pre-IPO) companies and sample transaction data from SharesPost, a leading private-company marketplace.

Companies in the United States are staying private longer. During the period 1996-2000, the average company completing an initial public offering (IPO) was 6 years old at the time of the offering. In the early 2000s, the average age rose to 8 years. Following the financial crisis, it increased to 10 years. At the same time, the value of private companies has increased. Currently, almost 200 companies globally have a private-market valuation above $1 billion. The largest 15 of these are collectively valued at $300 billion.

READ MORE »

The MAC Is Back

William Savitt and Ryan A. McLeod are partners at Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz. This post is based on a Wachtell Lipton publication by Mr. Savitt and Mr. McLeod, and is part of the Delaware law series; links to other posts in the series are available here.

In a 246-page post-trial opinion issued today [October 1, 2018], the Delaware Court of Chancery ruled that Fresenius Kabi AG, a German pharmaceutical company, properly terminated its agreement to purchase US-based drug maker Akorn, Inc. Akorn, Inc. v. Fresenius Kabi AG, C.A. No. 2018-0300-JTL (Del. Ch. Oct. 1, 2018). Most notable in the sweeping decision is the Court of Chancery’s determination that Akorn suffered a material adverse change that supported Fresenius’s right to terminate. Until today, common M&A wisdom has been that the Court of Chancery had never recognized a MAC—at least, never one sufficient to provide a buyer the right to walk. That wisdom must be updated in light of today’s ruling.

READ MORE »

Page 6 of 8
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8