-
Supported By:

Subscribe or Follow
Program on Corporate Governance Advisory Board
- Peter Atkins
- David Bell
- Kerry E. Berchem
- Richard Brand
- Daniel Burch
- Paul Choi
- Jesse Cohn
- Arthur B. Crozier Christine Davine
- Renata J. Ferrari
- Andrew Freedman
- Ray Garcia
- Byron Georgiou
- Joseph Hall
- Jason M. Halper William P. Mills
- David Millstone
- Theodore Mirvis
- Philip Richter
- Elina Tetelbaum
- Sebastian Tiller
- Marc Trevino Jonathan Watkins
- Steven J. Williams
HLS Faculty & Senior Fellows
Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation
Sanctions Compliance Programs and Flags “Root Causes”
On May 2, 2019, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) issued guidance entitled “A Framework for OFAC Compliance Commitments” (the “Framework”), that strongly encourages companies to “develop, implement, and routinely update” a risk-based sanctions compliance programs (“SCPs”). OFAC made clear that the guidance was intended for U.S. companies as well as […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement, Securities Regulation
Tagged Audits, Compliance & ethics, Internal control, International governance, Money laundering, OFAC, Risk, Sanctions, Securities enforcement, Securities regulation
Comments Off on Sanctions Compliance Programs and Flags “Root Causes”
13F Analysis: Q1 2019
Rule 13F-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires institutional investors with discretionary authority over more than $100m of public equity securities to make quarterly filings on Schedule 13F Schedule 13F filings disclose an investor’s holdings as of the end of the quarter, but generally do not disclose short positions or holdings of certain […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Disclosure, Hedge funds, Institutional Investors, Shareholder activism
Comments Off on 13F Analysis: Q1 2019
Corporate Law and the Myth of Efficient Market Control
A central question in corporate legal theory is whether large corporations should be conceived as hierarchical enclaves that operate apart from markets or as entities that operate within markets and under market control. The majority favors market control, making two basic assumptions: first, shareholders have the right incentives to mitigate the managerial agency problem, and, […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Corporate Elections & Voting
Tagged Agency costs, Delaware law, Incentives, Management, Market efficiency, Moral hazard, Shareholder activism, Shareholder power, Shareholder voting
Comments Off on Corporate Law and the Myth of Efficient Market Control
A Fresh Look at Exclusive Forum Provisions
One common feature of large M&A transactions is the almost inevitable stockholder litigation challenging the transaction. Initially, this litigation focused on allegations under state law—that the directors failed to satisfy their Revlon obligations and their duty of candor. Such litigation often was brought in multiple forums, forcing the target to devote significant resources attempting to […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Court Cases, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement, Securities Regulation
Tagged Charter & bylaws, Delaware cases, Delaware law, DGCL, Forum selection, Incorporations, Jurisdiction, SEC, Securities Act, Securities litigation, Securities regulation
Comments Off on A Fresh Look at Exclusive Forum Provisions
Review and Predictions: 2019 Federal Securities Litigation and Regulation
While the past year, or even eighteen months, was short on landmark federal securities law decisions, there was significant activity on the part of private securities litigants. In 2018, plaintiffs filed 403 new federal securities fraud class actions, just short of 2017’s record high of 412. This continued a marked uptick in securities filings over […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement, Securities Regulation
Tagged Insider trading, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, SEC, Securities enforcement, Securities fraud, Securities litigation, Securities regulation, Supreme Court, U.S. federal courts
Comments Off on Review and Predictions: 2019 Federal Securities Litigation and Regulation
Compliance, Compensation and Corporate Wrongdoing
It can hardly be disputed that society has a basic interest in companies’ maximum compliance with the law. Numerous cases in the financial industry, particularly in the aftermath of the Financial Crisis 2008, have indicated that this remains a significant challenge. Bank of America alone paid $56B in fines to the US government in connection […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Accounting & Disclosure, Executive Compensation, HLS Research
Tagged Compliance & ethics, Corporate fraud, Executive Compensation, Global Settlement, Misconduct, Securities enforcement
Comments Off on Compliance, Compensation and Corporate Wrongdoing
Management Duty to Set the Right “Tone at the Top”
In late March 2019, the Hertz Corporation and Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. (collectively, “Hertz”), filed two complaints (the “Damages Proceedings”) against its former CEO, CFO, General Counsel and a group president seeking recovery of $70 million in incentive payments and $200 million in consequential damages resulting from Hertz’s 2015 decision to restate its financial statements […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement, Securities Regulation
Tagged Compliance & ethics, General counsel, Internal control, Liability standards, Management, Misconduct, Negligence, Restatements, Securities enforcement, Securities litigation
Comments Off on Management Duty to Set the Right “Tone at the Top”
Externalities and the Common Owner
Most of the stock market is controlled by institutional investors holding broadly diversified economy-mirroring portfolios. In an article recently posted on SSRN, Externalities and the Common Owner, I argue that diversified investors should rationally be motivated to internalize intra-portfolio negative externalities. This portfolio perspective can explain the increasing climate change related activism of institutional investors: […]
Click here to read the complete postPresident Trump’s Executive Order and Shareholder Engagement on Climate Change
ERISA, the 1974 law that governs pension funds, recognizes that the third parties who manage those funds might be tempted to make decisions that were more in their interests than the interests of the people who were depending on them to make good decisions about their investments. And so the law makes it clear that […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Legislative & Regulatory Developments, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation
Tagged Boards of Directors, Climate change, DOL, Engagement, Environmental disclosure, ERISA, ESG, Proxy voting, Retirement plans, Shareholder proposals, Shareholder voting, Sustainability
1 Comment
The Relevance of Broker Networks for Information Diffusion in the Stock Market
Institutional investors routinely make use of brokers to execute their trades. Despite the rise of electronic trading, the Tabb Group reports that brokers handle about 42 percent of order flow from hedge funds. However, brokers’ roles in disseminating information that they acquire from clients is at best unclear. Although information about prices is readily disseminated […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Empirical Research, Institutional Investors, Securities Regulation
Tagged Asset management, Broker-dealers, Hedge funds, Information asymmetries, Information environment, Schedule 13D, Securities regulation
Comments Off on The Relevance of Broker Networks for Information Diffusion in the Stock Market