Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation

The Corporate Form for Social Good

State legislation allowing the establishment of benefit corporations—for-profit companies with a stated public purpose—has become widespread over the past decade. This increasingly available corporate form provides a mandate, and a safe harbor, for corporate leaders to pursue societal good along with shareholder profits. Directors are required to consider the impact of their decisions not only […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Corporate Elections & Voting, Corporate Social Responsibility, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Corporate Form for Social Good

UK Shareholder Activism and Battles for Corporate Control

The modus operandi of shareholder activism is to agitate for change, often involving campaigns to convince other shareholders to support proposals to change the composition of the board and the company’s strategy. Under UK law a shareholder activist, in its capacity as shareholder, can attack the board and its strategy in the press and in […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on UK Shareholder Activism and Battles for Corporate Control

Weekly Roundup: May 17–23, 2019

Educating Investors Through Leading Questions Posted by James McRitchie, CorpGov.net, on Friday, May 17, 2019 Tags: Disclosure, Institutional Investors, Proxy advisors, Proxy voting, Retail investors, Shareholder proposals, Shareholder value, Shareholder voting Reasons for “Male and Pale” Boards Posted by Cydney Posner, Cooley LLP, on Friday, May 17, 2019 Tags: Board composition, Board turnover, Boards of Directors, Director nominations, Diversity, Institutional Investors, Staggered boards, Succession Roe’s Short-Termism Work Selected as Top Corporate and Securities […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Weekly Roundup | Tagged | Comments Off on Weekly Roundup: May 17–23, 2019

Sunsets, Russets, and Rule Resets

Thank you, Peter [Easton] for that kind introduction. I appreciate the chance to be with you at today’s conference to discuss Hot Topics at the Securities and Exchange Commission. It is a small population of people who would describe anything the SEC does as hot, but I suspect there are more than a few in […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Practitioner Publications, Regulators Materials, Securities Regulation, Speeches & Testimony | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Sunsets, Russets, and Rule Resets

The Causal Mechanisms of Horizontal Shareholding

As I have shown in another paper, repeated empirical studies confirm that, in concentrated markets, higher levels of horizontal shareholding make anticompetitive effects more likely. Nonetheless, some critics argue that we should delay enforcement action until we have more proof on the causal mechanisms by which horizontal shareholders influence firm behavior. In my new paper, […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Boards of Directors, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Corporate Elections & Voting, Executive Compensation, Institutional Investors | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Causal Mechanisms of Horizontal Shareholding

Distressed M&A—The Rules of the Road

The topic of the complete publication (available here) is mergers and acquisitions where the target company is “distressed.” Distress for this purpose means that a company is having difficulty dealing with its liabilities—whether in making required payments on borrowed money, obtaining or paying down trade credit, addressing debt covenant breaches, or raising additional debt to […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Bankruptcy & Financial Distress, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Distressed M&A—The Rules of the Road

Event-Driven Litigation Defense

The authors address criticism of shareholder lawsuits presented in two recent reports by the U.S. Chamber’s Institute for Legal Reform (“ILR”). Released in October 2018 and February 2019, the ILR reports emphatically urge Congress, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and federal judges to act to curb a “contagion” of “abusive” securities class action litigation. Reiser […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Event-Driven Litigation Defense

Bankruptcy as Bailout: Coal Company Insolvency and the Erosion of Federal Law

Almost half of all the coal produced in the United States is mined by companies that have recently gone bankrupt. As we explain in a recent article in the Stanford Law Review, those bankruptcy proceedings have undermined federal environmental and labor laws. In particular, coal companies have used the Bankruptcy Code to evade congressionally imposed […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Bankruptcy & Financial Distress, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Corporate Social Responsibility, Empirical Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Bankruptcy as Bailout: Coal Company Insolvency and the Erosion of Federal Law

ESG in Money Markets

Environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors significantly influence the sustainability of returns in all asset classes, and cash management plays a critical role in a fully developed investment portfolio. Data limitations, regulatory constraints and logistical challenges related to portfolio construction and collateral analysis make it difficult to apply ESG scoring to money market funds. State […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on ESG in Money Markets

Simplified Disclosure for Acquisitions and Dispositions

On May 3 the SEC proposed amendments to the financial disclosure requirements relating to acquisitions and dispositions of businesses. The proposed amendments are intended to reduce the costs and complexity of required financial disclosure and should reduce the circumstances under which financial statements for acquired businesses need to be filed. The SEC previously requested comment […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Simplified Disclosure for Acquisitions and Dispositions