Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation

Do Investors Care About Carbon Risk?

Almost no day passes without a major news story related to climate change. This week alone Thomson Reuters reported a study that found that the Canadian permafrost is thawing 70 years earlier than forecast. Another Thomson Reuters story the same week announced that Norway’s sovereign wealth fund was to divest its $1 billion stake in […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Accounting & Disclosure, Empirical Research, Institutional Investors | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Do Investors Care About Carbon Risk?

Climate Portfolio Analysis: A Multifaceted Approach to Risk

Summary Climate portfolio analytics allows investors to assess and monitor risk exposure related to several climate-related issues, including emissions exposure, and physical and transitional risk. This article demonstrates the benefits of portfolio analysis related to climate change risk by providing a comparison of greenhouse gas emissions and climate risk exposure between the S&P 500 and […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Corporate Social Responsibility, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Climate Portfolio Analysis: A Multifaceted Approach to Risk

Proxy Advisory Firms, Governance, Failure, and Regulation

Proxy advisory firms have arisen due to market failures underlying voting and the broader system of corporate governance. However, proxy advisory firms, which are not subject to mandatory regulation, reflect market failures of their own. This analysis highlights the underlying frictions, such as the scale economies and public goods aspects to information production, the import […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Proxy Advisory Firms, Governance, Failure, and Regulation

Celebrity Stock Market

We typically think of stock markets as a mechanism for connecting investors who buy and sell shares of ownership in public companies. This helps distribute the successes and share the risks of these companies across a wider range of individuals. Talented individuals with business ideas often get venture capital or other forms of investor financing […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Celebrity Stock Market

The Standard of Review for Challenged Director Compensation

On May 31, 2019, Vice Chancellor Sam Glasscock of the Delaware Court of Chancery issued a decision refusing to dismiss a stockholder’s fiduciary duty claims challenging the compensation of Goldman Sachs’ board of directors.  The case highlights the type of claim potentially available to stockholders in challenging board (and sometimes executive) compensation, and it provides […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Court Cases, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Standard of Review for Challenged Director Compensation

Scarlet Letters: Remarks before the American Enterprise Institute

Thank you, Ben [Zycher]. I will begin with the standard disclaimer. My remarks represent my views and not necessarily those of the Commission or my fellow Commissioners. I will next address a question that is undoubtedly in the mind of at least one person in the audience. Did her parents really do that to her? […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation, Speeches & Testimony | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Scarlet Letters: Remarks before the American Enterprise Institute

Upstream Liability, Entities as Boards, and the Theory of the Firm

Directors have fiduciary duties, and the most litigated and most demanding of those duties is the duty of loyalty. The key questions for duty of loyalty litigation are director-by-director questions: Did this particular director have a conflict? Is it futile to make a demand on that particular director? What does it mean to ask director-by-director […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Boards of Directors, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Securities Litigation & Enforcement, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Upstream Liability, Entities as Boards, and the Theory of the Firm

OECD Corporate Governance Factbook 2019

The 2019 edition of the OECD Corporate Governance Factbook (the “Factbook”) contains comparative data and information across 49 different jurisdictions including all G20, OECD and Financial Stability Board members. The information is presented and commented in 40 tables and 51 figures covering a broad range of institutional, legal and regulatory provisions. The Factbook provides an […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on OECD Corporate Governance Factbook 2019

The Timing of Schedule 13D

In the field of corporate law, timing is everything. Perhaps in no area is this more the case than in disclosure—specifically, the disclosure obligations of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. Implemented by a phalanx of SEC rules, the Act carefully prescribes how and when an investor must make public its equity position in […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Timing of Schedule 13D

Rent-A-Center: A $1.37 BN Reminder on Reminders

Rent-A-Center Inc., a Texas based consumer goods rent-to-own retailer (R-A-C) most famous for enabling generations of North Americans to fill their homes with furniture, electronics and household appliances, agreed in June 2018 to a buyout by affiliates of the private equity firm, Vintage Capital Management, LLC (Vintage) in a deal valuing the R-A-C at $1.37 […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Rent-A-Center: A $1.37 BN Reminder on Reminders