Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation

Stakeholder Capitalism for Long-Term Value Creation

Boards can strengthen their oversight role by guiding management to focus on the long-term, understand stakeholder objectives and communicate the many ways their companies create value. Transformation of business, society and governments has accelerated over the last decade. Disruption, especially in business, is an increasing challenge for governments, society and companies to navigate and manage. […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Boards of Directors, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Stakeholder Capitalism for Long-Term Value Creation

Should Retail Investors’ Leverage Be Limited?

Financial markets feature considerable speculative trading that can harm uninformed investors. Consequently, financial market regulators have long grappled with how to prevent investors from making harmful speculative trades, while preserving markets for useful trades. Leverage is a major catalyst for speculative trading. Our article examines the impact of leverage limits on the retail foreign exchange […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Empirical Research, International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Should Retail Investors’ Leverage Be Limited?

Sometimes Silence is Golden: “Dell Compliance” Following Aruba III

The frequently discussed but generally unwritten story underlying the three judicial opinions in Verition Partners v. Aruba Networks involves a dispute between two luminaries of the Delaware Corporate Law—Vice Chancellor Travis Laster and Chief Justice Leo Strine. The story goes that Vice Chancellor Laster, fuming over his “rebuke” in Dell, a decision not written but generally […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Sometimes Silence is Golden: “Dell Compliance” Following Aruba III

Precluding Pre-Merger Communications in Post-Merger Dispute

In Shareholder Representative Services LLC v. RSI Holdco, LLC, C.A. No. 2018-0517-KSJM (Del. Ch. May 29, 2019), the Delaware Court of Chancery upheld a provision in a private-company merger agreement precluding a buyer from using the seller’s privileged emails against the seller in post-closing litigation. Following the guidance from the decision in Great Hill Equity […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Precluding Pre-Merger Communications in Post-Merger Dispute

Corporate Governance by Index Exclusion

Investors have long been unhappy with certain governance arrangements adopted by companies undertaking IPOs, such as dual-class voting structures. Traditional sources of corporate governance rules—the Securities and Exchange Commission, state law, and exchange listing rules—do not constrain these arrangements. As a result, investors have turned to a new source of governance rules: index providers. Our […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Corporate Elections & Voting, HLS Research, Institutional Investors, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Corporate Governance by Index Exclusion

What’s New on the SEC’s new RegFlex Agenda?

SEC Chair Jay Clayton has repeatedly made a point of his intent to take the Regulatory Flexibility Act Agenda “seriously,” streamlining it to show what the SEC actually expected to take up in the subsequent period. (Clayton has previously said that the short-term agenda signifies rulemakings that the SEC actually planned to pursue in the […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Legislative & Regulatory Developments, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on What’s New on the SEC’s new RegFlex Agenda?

Help! I Settled With an Activist!

Public companies in the US and around the world are increasingly signing settlement agreements as a means to put shareholder activist campaigns to rest. While companies are allured by the prospect of a quick end to the public side of an activist campaign, settlement agreements often invite new disruptions inside the boardroom and interrupt a […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

CFO Gender and Financial Statement Irregularities

Our research examines whether CFO gender affects the likelihood of irregularities in a firm’s financial statements. In the current climate of increased focus on women leaders, especially in corporate positions, an intriguing question of academic and popular interest is whether male and female managers are associated with different firm decisions and behaviors. We examine this […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Accounting & Disclosure, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Empirical Research | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on CFO Gender and Financial Statement Irregularities

EVA, Not EBITDA: A Better Measure of Investment Value

There’s no doubting the popularity of EBITDA—earnings before interest taxes depreciation and amortization—as a measure of investment value. Analysts like EBITDA because it removes the vagaries of depreciation and taxes and is unaffected by company leverage ratios. EBITDA is certainly a useful indicator of the gross cash operating profit performance of a business. But is […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on EVA, Not EBITDA: A Better Measure of Investment Value

Climate Change Risk Oversight Framework for Directors

Key Takeaways The COP21 Paris Climate Accord signals the turning point of a global effort to address climate change. As nations begin to pursue their emission reduction strategies, directors should evaluate the climate-related risks facing their companies. State Street Global Advisors believes that boards should regard climate change as they would any other significant risk […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Social Responsibility, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Climate Change Risk Oversight Framework for Directors