Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation

Designing Pay Plans in the New 162(m) World

Over a year after the “performance-based compensation” exception to Section 162(m) of the IRS Code was eliminated as part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, relatively few companies have made significant changes to their pay programs to take advantage of its repeal. In part, it’s because of a short time frame for […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Executive Compensation, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Designing Pay Plans in the New 162(m) World

Strategic Trading as a Response to Short Sellers

There is consensus in the theoretical and empirical literature on the fact that short sellers are informed traders. Hence, economic theory suggests that when short sellers interact in the market with uninformed investors the extent to which prices reveal fundamental information (price efficiency) increases. The favorable regulatory environment for short selling in most developed countries […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Empirical Research, Institutional Investors | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Strategic Trading as a Response to Short Sellers

Proposed Amendments to Delaware’s LLC and Partnership Acts

Legislation proposing to amend the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act (LLC Act), the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act (LP Act) and the Delaware Revised Uniform Partnership Act (GP Act) (collectively, the LLC and Partnership Acts) has been introduced to the Delaware General Assembly. The following is a brief summary of some of the more […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Legislative & Regulatory Developments, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Proposed Amendments to Delaware’s LLC and Partnership Acts

Better the Devil You Know? Tipping Liability, Martoma and the Rise of 18 U.S.C. § 1348

Insider trading has frequently been splashed across headlines in recent months, with a congressman, an NFL player, a comedy writer, and a Silicon Valley executive all facing charges. In the background of these headlines are two legal developments that give the government greater flexibility to successfully litigate future insider trading cases, particularly those involving tipping. […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Better the Devil You Know? Tipping Liability, Martoma and the Rise of 18 U.S.C. § 1348

Legal Tools for the Active or Activist Shareholders

Boards of listed companies face increasing risk of campaigns from investors. Activist shareholders seek value creation, passive and institutional investors are encouraged to become engaged and active through the discharge of stewardship responsibilities and ESG issues are becoming increasingly important for investors. Remuneration The draft UK regulations (Companies (Directors Remuneration Policy and Directors Remuneration Report) […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Boards of Directors, Executive Compensation, Institutional Investors, International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Legal Tools for the Active or Activist Shareholders

Rulemaking Petition on Non-GAAP Financials in Proxy Statements

The Council of Institutional Investors (CII) on April 29, 2019, petitioned the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to require clear disclosure on use of non-GAAP financial metrics in the proxy statement Compensation Discussion & Analysis (CD&A). CII asked that the SEC apply the same rules and guidance in that document as it does for […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Executive Compensation, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Rulemaking Petition on Non-GAAP Financials in Proxy Statements

The Never-Ending Quest for Shareholder Rights: Special Meetings and Written Consent

Almost thirty years ago, Chancellor William Allen famously remarked that “a corporation is not a New England town meeting.” Perhaps so—but efforts are under way to change this. One of the most sought-after shareholder rights is the right of shareholders to take actions not just at annual meetings, the corporate equivalent of regularly scheduled political […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Never-Ending Quest for Shareholder Rights: Special Meetings and Written Consent

Weekly Roundup: May 24-30, 2019

UK Shareholder Activism and Battles for Corporate Control Posted by Sam Bagot, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, on Friday, May 24, 2019 Tags: Boards of Directors, Compliance and disclosure interpretation, Disclosure, Duty of good faith, Duty of loyalty, Fiduciary duties, Inside information, International governance, Management, Shareholder activism, UK The Corporate Form for Social Good Posted by David A. Katz and Laura McIntosh, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Weekly Roundup | Tagged | Comments Off on Weekly Roundup: May 24-30, 2019

A Quarter Century of Exchange-Traded Fun!

Since the first exchange-traded fund (“ETF”) launched in 1993, ETFs have proven to be one of the most useful and successful innovations in the registered fund space under the Investment Company Act (“Act”) of 1940. The innovation did not stop with that first ETF. Besides being one of the fund industry’s most successful financial innovations, […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Practitioner Publications, Regulators Materials, Securities Regulation, Speeches & Testimony | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on A Quarter Century of Exchange-Traded Fun!

Proxy Advisor Influence

Commentators point to a fairly standard set of factors to explain why proxy advisors exert the influence they do over institutional investors and corporate managers. They say that proxy advisors can mitigate institutional investors’ collective action problems, that legal rules and high levels of institutional investor ownership have created demand for proxy advisors’ services, and […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Boards of Directors, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Corporate Elections & Voting, Institutional Investors, International Corporate Governance & Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Proxy Advisor Influence