-
Supported By:
Subscribe or Follow
Program on Corporate Governance Advisory Board
- William Ackman
- Peter Atkins
- David Bell
- Kerry E. Berchem
- Richard Brand
- Daniel Burch
- Paul Choi
- Jesse Cohn
- Arthur B. Crozier Christine Davine
- Renata J. Ferrari
- John Finley
- Andrew Freedman
- Ray Garcia
- Byron Georgiou
- Joseph Hall
- Jason M. Halper
- Paul Hilal
- Carl Icahn William P. Mills
- David Millstone
- Theodore Mirvis
- Philip Richter
- Elina Tetelbaum
- Sebastian Tiller
- Marc Trevino Jonathan Watkins
- Steven J. Williams
- Daniel Wolf
HLS Faculty & Senior Fellows
Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation
Cheap-Stock Tunneling Around Preemptive Rights
In a paper recently posted on SSRN, Cheap-Stock Tunneling Around Preemptive Rights, we show that preemptive rights are much less effective at protecting outside investors than is widely believed. Corporate insiders may engage in tunneling—transactions to transfer value from outside shareholders to themselves. Reducing tunneling is corporate law’s most basic function, as fear of tunneling […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Empirical Research, HLS Research, Securities Regulation
Tagged Capital formation, Conflicts of interest, Controlling shareholders, Equity offerings, Information asymmetries, Investor protection, Offer pricing, Shareholder rights, Tunneling
Comments Off on Cheap-Stock Tunneling Around Preemptive Rights
The Hypocrisy of Hedge Fund Activists
In virtually every activism campaign, hedge fund activists don the mantle of the shareholders’ champion and accuse the target company’s board and management of subpar corporate governance. This claim to having “best practices of corporate governance” at heart is hollow—even hypocritical—as evidenced by at least three examples: hedge fund activists actually undermine the shareholder franchise, […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Board composition, Board independence, Boards of Directors, Diversity, Governance standards, Hedge funds, Institutional Investors, Settlements, Shareholder activism, Shareholder voting, Takeover defenses
2 Comments
Anticipating and Planning for Geopolitical & Regulatory Changes
Late in 2017, the EY Center for Board Matters highlighted the importance of anticipating and planning for geopolitical and regulatory changes in our report, Top priorities for US boards in 2018. That priority has since intensified. In the first few months of 2018, US stock indexes experienced the highest levels of volatility since 2014. Long-standing […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Boards of Directors, Engagement, International governance, Management, Risk, Risk management, Risk oversight
Comments Off on Anticipating and Planning for Geopolitical & Regulatory Changes
How To Avoid Bungling Off-Cycle Engagements with Stockholders
Many clients are now turning from their annual meeting to plans for off-cycle engagements with their institutional investors, including the passive strategy behemoths (Blackrock, State Street and Vanguard which tend to own, in the aggregate, around 20% of many of our mid- and large-cap clients), traditional actively managed funds, pension funds, and hedge funds. The […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Boards of Directors, Engagement, Index funds, Institutional Investors, Long-Term value, Proxy season, Shareholder meetings, Shareholder voting
Comments Off on How To Avoid Bungling Off-Cycle Engagements with Stockholders
Nomination Committees and Corporate Governance: Lessons from Sweden and the UK
The board of director nomination-process is a particularly important but largely ignored aspect of corporate governance. It has been ignored in relation to the attention that has been paid to other corporate governance committees, such as the remuneration and audit committees. Both of these appear to have greater relevance to the financial performance of firms […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Boards of Directors, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Institutional Investors, International Corporate Governance & Regulation
Tagged Agency costs, Board oversight, Boards of Directors, Conflicts of interest, Corporate culture, Director nominations, Engagement, EU, Institutional Investors, International governance, Nominating committees, Ownership, Sweden, UK
Comments Off on Nomination Committees and Corporate Governance: Lessons from Sweden and the UK
Caremark and Reputational Risk Through #MeToo Glasses
Public and private businesses today face many decisions that do not arise from, and have consequences far beyond, solely financial performance. Rather, these decisions are primarily driven by, and implicate, important social, cultural and political concerns. They include harassment, pay equity and other issues raised by the #MeToo movement; immigration and labor markets; trade policy; […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Boards of Directors, Court Cases, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Accountability, Boards of Directors, Business judgment rule, Caremark, Compliance & ethics, Corporate culture, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Director liability, Duty of care, Fiduciary duties, Liability standards, Management, Misconduct, Reputation
1 Comment
Global Governance: Board Independence Standards and Practices
Global board practices have changed significantly in recent years. Regulatory developments, the introductions and revisions of corporate governance codes, and company-shareholder engagement have all contributed towards the improvement of standards in both developed and developing economies. In an effort to assess the landscape of global governance, we look at the current state of board governance […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Institutional Investors, International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Asia-Pacific, Board independence, Boards of Directors, Europe, International governance, Securities regulation
Comments Off on Global Governance: Board Independence Standards and Practices
Weekly Roundup: May 25-31, 2018
Continued Compensation to Incapacitated Controllers Posted by Ning Chiu, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, on Friday, May 25, 2018 Tags: Boards of Directors, Compensation committees, Controlling shareholders, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Director compensation, Duty of good faith, Executive Compensation, Fiduciary duties, Management Expanding the On-Ramp: Recommendations to Help More Companies Go and Stay Public Posted by Brian, O’Shea, U.S. Chamber of Commerce, on Friday, May 25, 2018 […]
Click here to read the complete postSpotlight on Boards 2018
The ever-evolving challenges facing corporate boards prompt an updated snapshot of what is expected from the board of directors of a major public company—not just the legal rules, but also the aspirational “best practices” that have come to have equivalent influence on board and company behavior. Today, boards are expected to:
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Executive Compensation, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Board leadership, Boards of Directors, Compensation committees, Director compensation, Engagement, Executive Compensation, Executive performance, Management, Risk management, Shareholder activism
Comments Off on Spotlight on Boards 2018