-
Supported By:
Subscribe or Follow
Program on Corporate Governance Advisory Board
- William Ackman
- Peter Atkins
- David Bell
- Kerry E. Berchem
- Richard Brand
- Daniel Burch
- Paul Choi
- Jesse Cohn
- Arthur B. Crozier Christine Davine
- Renata J. Ferrari
- John Finley
- Andrew Freedman
- Ray Garcia
- Byron Georgiou
- Joseph Hall
- Jason M. Halper
- Paul Hilal
- Carl Icahn William P. Mills
- David Millstone
- Theodore Mirvis
- Philip Richter
- Elina Tetelbaum
- Sebastian Tiller
- Marc Trevino Jonathan Watkins
- Steven J. Williams
- Daniel Wolf
HLS Faculty & Senior Fellows
Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation
UK Announces Corporate Governance Reforms
On August 29, the UK Business Secretary Greg Clark has set out the British government’s plans for corporate governance reform, which are intended to “enhance the public’s trust in business”. In the coming months, the government will introduce new legislation that will require: Listed companies to annually publish and justify the pay ratio between CEOs and their […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Boards of Directors, Executive Compensation, Institutional Investors, International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Board composition, Boards of Directors, Compensation disclosure, Compensation ratios, Corporate governance, Disclosure, Executive Compensation, International governance, Stakeholders, UK
Comments Off on UK Announces Corporate Governance Reforms
The Effects of Hedge Fund Interventions on Strategic Firm Behavior
In the paper, The Effects of Hedge Fund Interventions on Strategic Firm Behavior, forthcoming in Management Science, we examine the impact of hedge fund interventions on target firms’ voluntary disclosure and earnings management strategies. Hedge fund activism has emerged as an important governance mechanism that brings about significant changes in the operations and governance of target […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Accounting & Disclosure, Empirical Research, Institutional Investors
Tagged Disclosure, Earnings announcements, Entrenchment, Financial reporting, Forecasting, Hedge funds, Information environment, Management, Shareholder activism, Target firms, Voluntary Disclosure
Comments Off on The Effects of Hedge Fund Interventions on Strategic Firm Behavior
The Trian/P&G Proxy Contest
Trian’s P&G whitepaper is a unique support document for an activist proxy contest. Its 93 pages are replete with suggestions and criticisms that should be taken into account by companies in connection with their preparations to avoid an activist attack and for dealing with an activist. The whitepaper raises the not unusual issues of comparative peer […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Institutional Investors, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Boards of Directors, Institutional Investors, Long-Term value, Management, Proxy contests, Shareholder activism, Shareholder value, Shareholder voting
Comments Off on The Trian/P&G Proxy Contest
Forum-Selection Provisions in Corporate “Contracts”
In our paper, we consider the emergent practice of including clauses in corporate certificates of incorporation or bylaws that specify an exclusive judicial forum for lawsuits. So far, state and lower federal courts that have considered whether such clauses are valid or enforceable have applied a contractual approach that mimics judicial treatment of forum-terms in […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Accounting & Disclosure, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation
Tagged Charter & bylaws, Contracts, Delaware articles, Delaware law, DGCL, Forum selection, Incorporations, Jurisdiction, Merger litigation, Shareholder suits, State law
Comments Off on Forum-Selection Provisions in Corporate “Contracts”
Another Road Leading to Business Judgment Review—Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia
In In re Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc. Stockholder Litigation (Aug. 18, 2017), the Delaware Court of Chancery dismissed claims made by former stockholders of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia (“MSLO” or the “Company”) against the Company’s former controlling stockholder, Martha Stewart, for alleged breaches of her fiduciary duties in connection with the 2015 sale of the Company […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Appraisal rights, Business judgment rule, Conflicts of interest, Controlling shareholders, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Fairness review, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Minority shareholders, Shareholder suits
Comments Off on Another Road Leading to Business Judgment Review—Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia
Shareholder Litigation of Externally Managed REIT Allowed to Proceed
The Delaware Court of Chancery recently denied a motion to dismiss a shareholder derivative suit brought against an externally managed REIT. The shareholder alleged that the board of directors breached its fiduciary duties by (1) renewing the REIT’s management agreement with its external manager each year and (2) approving a transaction in which the REIT […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Court Cases, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement
Tagged Agency costs, Boards of Directors, Compensation committees, Conflicts of interest, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Derivative suits, Executive Compensation, Fiduciary duties, Management, REITs, Securities litigation, Shareholder suits
Comments Off on Shareholder Litigation of Externally Managed REIT Allowed to Proceed
The High Cost of Fewer Appraisal Claims in 2017: Premia Down, Agency Costs Up
This post considers the preliminary results of an ongoing effort to discourage appraisal litigation. In the year since the August 2016 reforms to the Delaware appraisal statute, Chancery has issued a slew of at-or-below merger price appraisal opinions in cases such as Clearwire and PetSmart, while simultaneously pinioning fiduciary litigation by reiterating the principles of […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Mergers & Acquisitions
Tagged Acquisition premiums, Appraisal rights, Delaware articles, Delaware law, Golden parachutes, Management, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Shareholder suits
Comments Off on The High Cost of Fewer Appraisal Claims in 2017: Premia Down, Agency Costs Up
How M&A Agreements Handle the Risks and Challenges of PRC Acquirors
U.S. and European companies continue to receive bids to sell themselves and their significant assets to companies based in the People’s Republic of China. Evaluation of these proposals requires due diligence of the acquiror’s ownership structure, assets, cash position, and financing sources. Moreover, even if this due diligence exercise gives rise to satisfactory results, the […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications, Private Equity
Tagged Acquisition agreements, Antitrust, Arbitration, China, Cross-border transactions, International governance, Mergers & acquisitions, Private equity
Comments Off on How M&A Agreements Handle the Risks and Challenges of PRC Acquirors
Weekly Roundup: September 1–7, 2017
Political Uncertainty and Firm Disclosure Posted by Audra Boone, Texas Christian University, on Friday, September 1, 2017 Tags: Capital markets, Disclosure, Filings, Form 8-K, Information asymmetries, Information environment, Management, Market conditions, Market reaction, SEC, Transparency, Voluntary Disclosure Corporate Governance—the New Paradigm Posted by Martin Lipton, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Friday, September 1, 2017 Tags: Board independence, Boards of Directors, Compensation ratios, Engagement, Executive Compensation, Fiduciary duties, International governance, Long-Term value, Public interest, Shareholder activism, Shareholder value, Short-termism, UK, Vanguard NYDFS Cybersecurity […]
Click here to read the complete postOut of Sight Out of Mind: The Case for Improving Director Independence Disclosure
In July 2016, a coalition of 13 CEOs and heads of major investment firms—which included names like JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon, Berkshire Hathaway CEO Warren Buffett, General Motors CEO Mary Barra and BlackRock CEO Larry Fink—released the Commonsense Principles of Corporate Governance (discussed on the Forum here). These Principles emphasize the critical role of […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Accounting & Disclosure, Boards of Directors, Empirical Research, Institutional Investors, Securities Regulation
Tagged Board independence, Boards of Directors, Conflicts of interest, Disclosure, Information environment, Institutional Investors, Regulation S-K, Securities regulation, Transparency
Comments Off on Out of Sight Out of Mind: The Case for Improving Director Independence Disclosure