-
Supported By:
Subscribe or Follow
HLS Faculty & Senior Fellows
Program on Corporate Governance Advisory Board
- Peter Atkins
- David Bell
- Kerry E. Berchem
- Richard Brand
- Daniel Burch
- Paul Choi
- Jesse Cohn
- Arthur B. Crozier
- Renata J. Ferrari
- Andrew Freedman
- Ray Garcia
- Joseph Hall
- Jason M. Halper William P. Mills
- David Millstone
- Theodore Mirvis
- Philip Richter
- Elina Tetelbaum
- Sebastian Tiller
- Marc Trevino
- Steven J. Williams
Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation
Harvard Convenes the 2016 Corporate Governance Roundtable
The Harvard Law School Program on Corporate Governance and the Harvard Law School Program on Institutional Investors convened the Harvard Roundtable on Corporate Governance last Wednesday, March 16. The event brought together for a roundtable discussion seventy-nine prominent experts with a wide range of perspectives on this subject, including those of investors, issuers, advisors, academics, and public […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Program News & Events
Tagged Corporate governance, Program on Corporate Governance, Program on Institutional Investors
Comments Off on Harvard Convenes the 2016 Corporate Governance Roundtable
Single-Counterparty Credit Limits Rule
On March 4th, the Federal Reserve Board (FRB) reproposed its single-counterparty credit limits (SCCL) rule. The reproposal comes several years after two earlier versions (in 2011 and 2012), [1] and almost two years after the related large exposures framework issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS). [2] It is intended to reduce systemic […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Banking & Financial Institutions, Derivatives, Financial Regulation, International Corporate Governance & Regulation
Tagged Banks, Basel Committee, Capital requirements, Credit exposure, Credit risk, Derivatives, Dodd-Frank Act, Federal Reserve, Financial institutions, Financial regulation, Foreign banks, OTC derivatives, Risk, Risk management, SIFIs, Systemic risk
Comments Off on Single-Counterparty Credit Limits Rule
2015 Review of BSA/AML and Sanctions Developments
This post highlights what we believe to be the most significant developments and trends during 2015 for financial institutions with respect to U.S. Bank Secrecy Act/anti-money-laundering (“BSA/AML”) and U.S. sanctions programs, including sanctions administered by the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”). In 2015, the overarching trend continued to be […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Banking & Financial Institutions, Financial Regulation, Legislative & Regulatory Developments, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Banks, Bitcoin, BSA/AML, Compliance & ethics, Corporate crime, Cybersecurity, Director liability, DOJ, Financial institutions, Financial regulation, Foreign banks, Misconduct, Risk management, Treasury Department
Comments Off on 2015 Review of BSA/AML and Sanctions Developments
Proposed Revisions to 13(d) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Rules
Legislation introduced yesterday [March 17, 2016] in Congress calls for substantial steps to be taken towards increasing transparency and fairness in the public equity markets. If adopted, the Brokaw Act would direct the Securities and Exchange Commission to amend the Section 13(d) reporting rules. The proposed amendments would include shortening the filing window applicable to […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Legislative & Regulatory Developments, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation
Tagged Antitakeover, Beneficial owners, Blockholders, Disclosure, Hedge funds, Long-Term value, Mergers & acquisitions, Ownership, Schedule 13D, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities regulation, Shareholder activism, Short-termism, Takeover defenses, Transparency
Comments Off on Proposed Revisions to 13(d) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Rules
Omnicare: Liability Standards for Statements of Opinion
On March 4, 2016, in Tongue v. Sanofi, [1] the Second Circuit interpreted and applied for the first time the Supreme Court’s decision in Omnicare Inc. v. Laborers Dist. Council Const. Indus. Pension Fund, [2] which addressed the circumstances under which issuers can be liable for statements of opinion or projections. The Second Circuit acknowledged […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Court Cases, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement
Tagged Class actions, Disclosure, Fraud-on-the-Market, Information asymmetries, Investor protection, Liability standards, Registration statements, Reliance, Securities Act, Securities litigation, Shareholder suits, U.S. federal courts
Comments Off on Omnicare: Liability Standards for Statements of Opinion
Weekly Roundup: March 11-March 17
Antitrust Enforcement of Small Acquisitions Posted by Nathaniel L. Asker, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, on Friday, March 11, 2016 Tags: Acquisitions, Antitrust, Disclosure, DOJ, FTC, Hart-Scott-Rodino Act, Mergers & acquisitions, Securities enforcement, Securities Regulation Deposit Calculations on Demand Posted by Dan Ryan, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, on Saturday, March 12, 2016 Tags: Banks, Books […]
Click here to read the complete postIndividuals in the Cross Hairs? What This Means for Directors
Following the 2008 financial crisis, government regulators and prosecutors have been under tremendous public pressure to prosecute individuals. Senior government officials have responded by speaking forcefully about their desires to sue or prosecute more individuals. What does the government’s heated rhetoric and renewed focus on individual liability mean for corporate directors? As the chairman of the […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Boards of Directors, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement, Securities Regulation
Tagged Audit committee, Board leadership, Boards of Directors, Compliance & ethics, Corporate culture, Director liability, Engagement, Liability standards, Management, Misconduct, SEC, Securities enforcement, Securities regulation
Comments Off on Individuals in the Cross Hairs? What This Means for Directors
Business Groups in Canada: Their Rise and Fall, and Rise and Fall Again
Outside the United States, seemingly independent listed firms can be controlled as a unit via pyramiding. Chart 1 illustrates: An apex firm, often a family firm, holds enough equity in each subsidiary to control its shareholder meeting, letting public shareholders own the rest (its public float). Because public shareholders rarely vote, the Canada Business Corporations […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Bankruptcy & Financial Distress, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Empirical Research, International Corporate Governance & Regulation
Tagged Business groups, Canada, Controlling shareholders, Corporate pyramids, Distressed companies, Diversification, Leverage, Private firms, Rent-seeking, Risk management
Comments Off on Business Groups in Canada: Their Rise and Fall, and Rise and Fall Again
Board Leadership Structure: Impact on CEO Pay
Do more titles equal higher pay? It is well-documented that U.S. CEOs’ compensation, when compared to that of the average worker, has ballooned in recent decades. Past studies of the drivers of CEO pay at public companies have largely focused on firm size, number of employees, revenues, and TSR (total shareholder return) among other factors. A […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Empirical Research, Executive Compensation, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Board composition, Board independence, Board leadership, Boards of Directors, Executive Compensation, Firm performance, Institutional Investors, Management, Outside directors, Shareholder value
Comments Off on Board Leadership Structure: Impact on CEO Pay
What’s Behind the All-Time High in M&A?
Headlines over the past year have been filled with news of mega-mergers. Big companies across numerous sectors and continents have been joining forces at record rates. Last year’s $5 trillion worth of deals worldwide was more than a one-third increase over 2014 and set a new high. Why the surge in M&A, and what does […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications, Private Equity
Tagged Acquisitions, Arbitrage, China, Cross-border transactions, Emerging markets, International governance, Inversions, Leveraged acquisitions, Merger waves, Mergers & acquisitions, Private equity, Spinoffs, Strategic buyers, Tax avoidance, Taxation
Comments Off on What’s Behind the All-Time High in M&A?