-
Supported By:
Subscribe or Follow
Program on Corporate Governance Advisory Board
- William Ackman
- Peter Atkins
- David Bell
- Kerry E. Berchem
- Richard Brand
- Daniel Burch
- Paul Choi
- Jesse Cohn
- Arthur B. Crozier Christine Davine
- Renata J. Ferrari
- John Finley
- Andrew Freedman
- Ray Garcia
- Byron Georgiou
- Joseph Hall
- Jason M. Halper
- Paul Hilal
- Carl Icahn William P. Mills
- David Millstone
- Theodore Mirvis
- Philip Richter
- Elina Tetelbaum
- Sebastian Tiller
- Marc Trevino Jonathan Watkins
- Steven J. Williams
- Daniel Wolf
HLS Faculty & Senior Fellows
Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation
Delaware Court Supports Morton’s Sale Process and PE Exit Motives
In a recent decision of note concerning the 2012 sale of Morton’s Restaurant Group to Landry’s, Inc., Chancellor Strine of the Delaware Court of Chancery found that a private equity firm with a 28 percent stake in Morton’s was not a controlling stockholder, applied the business judgment rule, and dismissed the stockholder plaintiffs’ challenge to […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications, Private Equity
Tagged Delaware cases, Delaware law, Merger litigation, Private equity, Shareholder suits
Comments Off on Delaware Court Supports Morton’s Sale Process and PE Exit Motives
CFTC Adopts Final Rule Amendments for CPOs and CTAs
On August 13, 2013, the CFTC adopted final rule amendments to accept compliance with the disclosure, reporting and recordkeeping regime administered by the SEC as substituted compliance for substantially all of part 4 of the CFTC’s regulations that are applicable to CPOs of funds registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940. [1] The adopting […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Legislative & Regulatory Developments, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation
Tagged Books and records, CFTC, Commodities, Disclosure, Financial reporting, Reporting regulation, SEC, Securities regulation
Comments Off on CFTC Adopts Final Rule Amendments for CPOs and CTAs
The Value of Local Political Connections in a Low-Corruption Environment
Connections between firms and politicians are widespread around the world. Faccio (2006) documents the existence of publicly traded firms with national political connections in 35 of 45 countries; these firms account for nearly 8% of the world’s stock market capitalization. She also documents that national political connections are valuable, especially in countries with weak political […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Empirical Research, International Corporate Governance & Regulation
Tagged Denmark, Europe, International governance, Social capital
Comments Off on The Value of Local Political Connections in a Low-Corruption Environment
Fed To Charge Big-Banks for Supervision Under Dodd-Frank
An obscure section of the Dodd-Frank Act has been implemented by the Federal Reserve, to be effective later this year. Traditionally the Federal Reserve has not charged examination or similar fees for institutions under its supervision, but Congress determined that the largest institutions should be assessed an amount intended to reimburse the Federal Reserve for […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Banking & Financial Institutions, Financial Regulation, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Banks, Dodd-Frank Act, Federal Reserve, Financial institutions, Financial regulation, Oversight, Surcharges
Comments Off on Fed To Charge Big-Banks for Supervision Under Dodd-Frank
Lock-Up Creep
If you have regularly read merger agreements over the past decade, you may have had a creeping feeling. You also may not be alone. Over the past decade the number and type of merger agreement lock-ups have materially increased. We examine this phenomenon in our article Lock-Up Creep, prepared for the Journal of Corporation Law […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Mergers & Acquisitions
Tagged Acquisition agreements, Deal protection, Negotiation, Takeovers, Termination fees
Comments Off on Lock-Up Creep
Delaware Court Confirms Accounting Experts’ Authority to Decide Disputes
On July 16, the Delaware Supreme Court [1] published an opinion that confirms and clarifies the scope of an accounting expert’s authority to resolve post-closing financial disputes that parties have agreed to submit for resolution under the terms of a definitive business acquisition agreement. This decision reaffirms alternative dispute resolution as the procedure of choice […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Court Cases, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Accounting, Acquisition agreements, Arbitration, Corporate disputes, Delaware law, Earnouts, Resolution authority
Comments Off on Delaware Court Confirms Accounting Experts’ Authority to Decide Disputes
SEC Adopts Final Amendments to Broker-Dealers Rules
On July 30, 2013, the SEC adopted final amendments (the “Final Amendments”) to the financial responsibility rules for broker-dealers (SEC Release No. 34-70072) (the “Release”). The Final Amendments make changes to the net capital, customer protection, books and records, and notification rules for broker-dealers. The SEC first proposed the rule changes in March 2007 and […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Banking & Financial Institutions, Financial Regulation, Legislative & Regulatory Developments, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation
Tagged Banks, Broker-dealers, Capital requirements, Consumer protection, Exchange Act, Financial institutions, Financial regulation, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities regulation
Comments Off on SEC Adopts Final Amendments to Broker-Dealers Rules
The Bebchuk Syllogism
Empirical studies show that attacks on companies by activist hedge funds benefit, and do not have an adverse effect on, the targets over the five-year period following the attack. Only anecdotal evidence and claimed real-world experience show that attacks on companies by activist hedge funds have an adverse effect on the targets and other companies […]
Click here to read the complete postPrivate and Judicial Resolution of Business Deadlock
The process of resolving business deadlocks is time consuming and expensive, typically requiring the services of lawyers, financial experts and judges. Prolonged resolution processes, cost-inefficient administration of those processes, and inequitable outcomes impose high monetary and non-monetary costs on the parties themselves and on society as a whole. Asset valuation, which is required to complete […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Mergers & Acquisitions
Tagged Corporate disputes, Information asymmetries, Partnerships
Comments Off on Private and Judicial Resolution of Business Deadlock