-
Supported By:
Subscribe or Follow
HLS Faculty & Senior Fellows
Program on Corporate Governance Advisory Board
- Peter Atkins
- David Bell
- Kerry E. Berchem
- Richard Brand
- Daniel Burch
- Paul Choi
- Jesse Cohn
- Arthur B. Crozier
- Renata J. Ferrari
- Andrew Freedman
- Ray Garcia
- Joseph Hall
- Jason M. Halper William P. Mills
- David Millstone
- Theodore Mirvis
- Philip Richter
- Elina Tetelbaum
- Sebastian Tiller
- Marc Trevino
- Steven J. Williams
Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation
Weekly Roundup: January 11-17, 2019
Quarterly Reporting—What’s Next? Posted by Nicolas Grabar, Jeffrey D. Karpf, and David Lopez, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, on Friday, January 11, 2019 Tags: Accounting, Financial reporting, Long-Term value, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities regulation, Shareholder value, Short-termism Top Priorities for Boards in 2019 Posted by Steve Klemash, Rani Doyle, and Jamie C. Smith, EY Center for Board Matters, on Friday, January 11, 2019 Tags: Board communication, Board […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Practitioner Publications
Tagged Weekly Roundup
Comments Off on Weekly Roundup: January 11-17, 2019
2018 Private Equity Year in Review
2018 was a banner year for private equity. As of late December, PE buyout volume had reached almost $384 billion, the highest since the PE boom before the financial crisis. The pace of activity overcame various macro challenges to PE dealmaking, including competition from strategic acquirors, high-multiple valuations and, in the fourth quarter, rising interest […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Institutional Investors, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications, Private Equity
Tagged Appraisal rights, Go-shop, Hedge funds, Institutional Investors, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Private equity, Shareholder activism
Comments Off on 2018 Private Equity Year in Review
Corporate Distress, Credit Default Swaps, and Defaults: Information and Traditional, Contingent, and Empty Creditors
Although securities regulators, practitioners, and academics have made vast efforts to ensure a robust informational foundation for investors, informational asymmetries associated with companies in financial distress, but not in bankruptcy, have received little attention. My article, Corporate Distress, Credit Default Swaps, and Defaults: Information and Traditional, Contingent, and Empty Creditors (forthcoming in the Brooklyn Journal […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Bankruptcy & Financial Distress, Derivatives, Securities Regulation
Tagged Bankruptcy, Credit default swaps, Debtor-creditor law, Derivatives, Distressed companies, Hedge funds, Information asymmetries, Information environment, Market efficiency, Securities regulation
Comments Off on Corporate Distress, Credit Default Swaps, and Defaults: Information and Traditional, Contingent, and Empty Creditors
Top 10 Topics for Directors in 2019
1. Corporate Culture The corporate culture of a company starts at the top, with the board of directors, and directors should be attuned not only to the company’s business, but also to its people and values across the company. Ongoing and thoughtful efforts to understand the company’s culture and address any issues will help the […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement, Securities Regulation
Tagged #MeToo, Board composition, Boards of Directors, Corporate culture, Cybersecurity, Diversity, SEC, SEC enforcement, Securities enforcement, Securities regulation, Shareholder activism, Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
Comments Off on Top 10 Topics for Directors in 2019
Post-Closing Merger Litigation—The Road Ahead
In a recent series of landmark decisions, the Delaware Supreme Court has constructed an orderly doctrinal framework designed to reduce wasteful post-closing merger litigation. These cases recognize that the market’s judgment is usually sound and that the costs of intensive litigation regarding transactions approved by informed and self-interested stockholders generally outweigh the benefits. A compelling […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement
Tagged Corwin, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Dell, In re Appraisal of DFC Global, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, MFW, Securities litigation, Settlements, Shareholder suits, Shareholder value
Comments Off on Post-Closing Merger Litigation—The Road Ahead
Electronic Proxy Statement Dissemination and Shareholder Monitoring
This study examines the effects of electronic dissemination of proxy statements on the monitoring of company management by retail investors, as well as strategic decisions by management regarding how proxy statements are disseminated. Retail investors are an economically important group, and regulators have sought to increase their participation in corporate governance decisions. One way that […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Empirical Research, International Corporate Governance & Regulation
Tagged Canada, International governance, Management, Oversight, Proxy disclosure, Proxy materials, Proxy voting, Retail investors, Shareholder meetings, Shareholder value, Shareholder voting
Comments Off on Electronic Proxy Statement Dissemination and Shareholder Monitoring
Financial Institutions Developments
The opening trading days of 2019 mostly continued the whipsaw pattern of late 2018, with large declines followed by large gains, each seemingly prompted by a bit of news and viewed as overreactions with the benefit of hindsight. In markets dominated by algorithmic trading, the fundamentals of individual companies have very little to do with […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Banking & Financial Institutions, Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Acquisition agreements, Acquisition premiums, Bank boards, Banks, Deal protection, Financial institutions, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Termination fees
Comments Off on Financial Institutions Developments
2019 Proxy Letter—Aligning Corporate Culture with Long-Term Strategy
As one of the world’s largest investment managers, we engage with companies in our investment portfolios as part of our fiduciary responsibility to maximize the probability of attractive long-term returns for our clients. Unlike our active investment strategies where we can sell a company’s stock when we disagree with management, in our index-based strategies we […]
Click here to read the complete postMergers and Acquisitions—2019
As a whole, 2018 proved to be another strong year for M&A. Total deal volume reached almost $4.2 trillion globally, higher than the $3.7 trillion volume of 2017, but still less than the record of over $5 trillion set in 2015. Deals involving U.S. targets totaled over $1.7 trillion, compared to approximately $1.5 trillion in […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Banking & Financial Institutions, Institutional Investors, International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications, Private Equity, Securities Regulation
Tagged Acquisition premiums, Acquisitions, Antitrust, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Financial institutions, Leveraged acquisitions, Market conditions, Mergers & acquisitions, Private equity, SEC, Securities regulation, Shareholder activism, Taxation
Comments Off on Mergers and Acquisitions—2019
Transparency in Corporate Groups
This Article addresses a remarkable blind spot in American law: the failure to apply the well-established principles of secured credit to prevent inefficiency, confusion, and fraud in the manipulation of the webs of subsidiaries within corporate groups. In particular, “asset partitioning” has been a fashionable subject in which the central problem of non-transparency has been […]
Click here to read the complete post