Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation

Should Corporations Step Into the Governmental Vacuum?

In this year’s annual letter to CEOs, BlackRock CEO Laurence Fink once again advocates the importance of a long-term approach, at the same time mourning the prevalence of political dysfunction and acknowledging the resulting increase in public anger and frustration: “some of the world’s leading democracies have descended into wrenching political dysfunction, which has exacerbated, rather than […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Corporate Social Responsibility, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Should Corporations Step Into the Governmental Vacuum?

Weekly Roundup: January 18-24, 2019

Incorporating Social Activism Posted by Tom C. W. Lin (Temple University), on Friday, January 18, 2019 Tags: Corporate culture, Corporate Social Responsibility, ESG, Reputation, Social contract Public Hedge Funds Posted by Lin Sun (Singapore Management University) and Melvyn Teo (Singapore Management University), on Saturday, January 19, 2019 Tags: Agency model, Asset management, Conflicts of interest, Fund performance, Hedge funds, IPOs, Private equity, Public firms Rule 14a-8 Shareholder Proposals and the […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Weekly Roundup | Tagged | Comments Off on Weekly Roundup: January 18-24, 2019

Global Antitakeover and Antiactivist Devices

Corporate activity is becoming ever more global. The increase in global activity is reflected both in the growing number of cross-border M&A transactions (which have reached over $1 trillion in the first half of 2018) and the pervasive phenomenon of cross-listing, through which companies raise equity from various financial markets located in different jurisdictions. In […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, HLS Research, International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Mergers & Acquisitions, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Global Antitakeover and Antiactivist Devices

The SEC’s Market Abuse Enforcement Priorities

Since January 2017, the SEC has quietly racked up at least half a dozen major enforcement actions charging a wide range of equity market structure violations. In these cases, dark pools, exchanges and broker-dealers have collectively paid more than $100 million in civil penalties and several of them have involved admissions of liability. Although the […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The SEC’s Market Abuse Enforcement Priorities

Purpose & Profit

Dear CEO, Each year, I write to the companies in which BlackRock invests on behalf of our clients, the majority of whom have decades-long horizons and are planning for retirement. As a fiduciary to these clients, who are the owners of your company, we advocate for practices that we believe will drive sustainable, long-term growth […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Corporate Social Responsibility, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Purpose & Profit

Competition and Consumer Protection in the 21st Century

BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”) appreciates the opportunity to comment in connection with the eighth session of the Federal Trade Commission’s (“FTC” or the “Commission”) hearings on Competition and Consumer Protection in the 21st Century. We welcome the FTC’s Hearings Initiative and efforts to evaluate the effectiveness of competition and consumer protection law, enforcement priorities, and public […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Corporate Elections & Voting, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Competition and Consumer Protection in the 21st Century

Market Power and Inequality

For over a century, the idea of the United States as a “nation of shareholders” has been a powerful one. This notion has its roots in attempts by the New York Stock Exchange to broaden its political base by ensuring that more Americans owned at least a handful of stocks, and Cold War comparisons of […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Empirical Research | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

The Expansion of Regulation A

On December 19, 2018, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) adopted amendments to Regulation A allowing U.S. and Canadian companies that file reports under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), to conduct securities offerings using Regulation A. The amendments were mandated by the Economic […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Expansion of Regulation A

Remarks at FTC Hearing on Competition and Consumer Protection in the 21st Century

Good morning, and thank you for inviting me to speak on institutional investors, diversification, and corporate governance. I make my comments from the perspective of a practitioner in asset management. Investment Stewardship Investment stewardship is a critical element of the corporate accountability chain that empowers shareholders to engage and vote on issues relevant to the […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Remarks at FTC Hearing on Competition and Consumer Protection in the 21st Century

Directors: Older and Wiser, or Too Old to Govern?

The past two decades have witnessed dramatic changes to the boards of directors of U.S. public corporations. Several recent governance reforms (the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the revised 2003 NYSE/Nasdaq listing rules, and the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act) combined with a rise in shareholder activism have enhanced director qualifications and independence and made boards more accountable. These […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Boards of Directors, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Empirical Research | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment