Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation

Purpose, Culture and Long-Term Value—Not Just a Headline

Key Takeaways Recent letters from two of the world’s largest long-term “passive” investors provide a powerful counterpoint to the seemingly never-ending short-term oriented agitation from activist hedge funds. These long-term investors believe that purpose and profit are “inextricably linked” and seek to elevate “value” (not “values”) in support of long-termism over short-termism. Index fund managers […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Corporate Elections & Voting, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Purpose, Culture and Long-Term Value—Not Just a Headline

The Board and ESG

Discussions of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) matters have taken hold in mainstream media, government bodies, coffee shops, the food industry, clothing manufacturers, and boardrooms. With such high stakes, this is an area that organizations, and their boards, cannot afford to get wrong. As overseers of risk and stewards of long-term enterprise value, board members […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Boards of Directors, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Board and ESG

Common Ownership in America: 1980-2017

The classic profit-maximizing model of the publicly-traded firm has underpinned every aspect of economics for a century, from antitrust and regulation to theories of taxes and trade. According to this model, a public firm’s shareholders hire the management to maximize the firm’s profits, and thereby maximize the value of those shares. Trends emerging in the […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Empirical Research, Institutional Investors, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Common Ownership in America: 1980-2017

D.C. Speaks Up: A Push for Board Diversity from the SEC and Congress

On February 6, 2019, the SEC Staff issued a new interpretation relating to director qualifications and diversity which could impact proxy statement disclosures for the upcoming proxy season, and potentially D&O questionnaires as well. On the same day, companion bills were introduced into both the U.S. House of Representatives and Senate that would require every […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Boards of Directors, Legislative & Regulatory Developments, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on D.C. Speaks Up: A Push for Board Diversity from the SEC and Congress

Corporate Governance in Emerging Markets

Analyzing corporate governance at companies in emerging markets can be really tough. A combination of differing regulatory standards, disclosure requirements, market norms, local investor preferences, and more all collude to make the evaluation of governance structures difficult. Giving credit where due, emerging market economies have made significant corporate governance strides over the past decade, as […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Boards of Directors, International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

CEO Pay Mix Changes Following Say on Pay Failures

In response to the 2008 financial crisis, U.S. legislation was passed in the form of the Dodd-Frank Act to bring some changes in the corporate environment. Say on Pay, which gives shareholders the right to vote on the remuneration of executives, addressed the issue of excessive CEO pay and was meant to give shareholders a […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Corporate Elections & Voting, Executive Compensation, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on CEO Pay Mix Changes Following Say on Pay Failures

The Division of Corporation Finance’s Response to Mandatory Arbitration Proposal

The issue of mandatory arbitration bylaws is a hot potato—and a partisan one at that (with Rs tending to favor and Ds tending to oppose). And in this no-action letter issued yesterday to Johnson & Johnson—granting relief to the company if it relied on Rule 14a-8(i)(2) (violation of law) to exclude a shareholder proposal requesting adoption […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Division of Corporation Finance’s Response to Mandatory Arbitration Proposal

A Capitalist’s Solution to the Problem of Excessive Buybacks

We may not need a government solution to the issue of excessive corporate stock buybacks. We most certainly do not need the solution proposed by Senators Chuck Schumer and Bernie Sanders, requiring companies to adopt minimum wage requirements for hourly workers before buying back stock. What we need is a capitalist solution, removing misaligned incentives, […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Executive Compensation, Legislative & Regulatory Developments, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Go-Shops Revisited

Until approximately 2005, the traditional sale process for U.S. public companies involved a broad market canvass and a merger agreement with the winning bidder, followed by a “no shop” obligation for the seller between the signing and the closing of the merger. In the mid-2000s, however, the introduction of the “go-shop” technology turned this standard […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Empirical Research, HLS Research, Mergers & Acquisitions, Private Equity | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Go-Shops Revisited

Weekly Roundup: February 15-21, 2019

Books and Records Access for Terminated Directors Posted by Gail Weinstein, Brian T. Mangino, and Randi Lally, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, on Friday, February 15, 2019 Tags: Boards of Directors, Books and records, Delaware cases, Delaware law, DGCL Section 220, Fiduciary duties, Management, Misconduct, Ousting directors, Reputation, Securities litigation Board Diversity by U.S. Region Posted by Brianna Ang, Equilar, Inc., on Saturday, February 16, 2019 […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Weekly Roundup | Tagged | Comments Off on Weekly Roundup: February 15-21, 2019