-
Supported By:
Subscribe or Follow
HLS Faculty & Senior Fellows
Program on Corporate Governance Advisory Board
- Peter Atkins
- David Bell
- Kerry E. Berchem
- Richard Brand
- Daniel Burch
- Paul Choi
- Jesse Cohn
- Arthur B. Crozier
- Renata J. Ferrari
- Andrew Freedman
- Ray Garcia
- Joseph Hall
- Jason M. Halper William P. Mills
- David Millstone
- Theodore Mirvis
- Philip Richter
- Elina Tetelbaum
- Sebastian Tiller
- Marc Trevino
- Steven J. Williams
Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation
New Developments in Shareholders’ Gender Pay Gap Proposals
Investors’ growing interest in the median gender pay gap (i.e., the wage difference between the median male employee and the median female employee) is the latest expression of a more granular approach to environmental, social and governance (ESG) investing. They are not only more focused on granularity, building on an initial call for public companies […]
Click here to read the complete postActivist CEOs Speak Out—Is There a Way to Do it Better?
It feels like CEOs are stepping into it—the political fray, that is—all the time these days. And recently, there has been a lot of pressure on CEOs to voice their views on political, environmental and social issues. According to the Global Chair of Reputation at Edelman, the expectation that CEOs will be leaders of change […]
Click here to read the complete postWeekly Roundup: March 15-21, 2019
Do Firms Respond to Gender Pay Gap Transparency? Posted by Margarita Tsoutsoura (Cornell University), on Friday, March 15, 2019 Tags: Compensation disclosure, Compensation ratios, Compensation regulation, Denmark, Diversity, Inequality, International governance, Transparency A Reminder About Corporate Crisis Communications Posted by John F. Savarese, David A. Katz, and Wayne M. Carlin, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Saturday, March 16, 2019 Tags: Compliance and disclosure interpretation, Disclosure, DOJ, Reputation, Risk management, SEC, SEC […]
Click here to read the complete postESG Rating and Momentum
Traditionally, asset managers have used Environmental, Social and Governance ratings in a defensive way to mitigate portfolio risk, but the model ESG portfolio we have run over the past five years has consistently outperformed the index (and by 27.7% over the full period). Also note that the top rated 10% of our ESG stocks outperformed […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Asset management, ESG, Financial reporting, International governance, Shareholder value, Stock performance, Sustainability
Comments Off on ESG Rating and Momentum
Incentive Pay and Systemic Risk
The SEC, the NYSE, and the U.S. government, accompanied by the actions of consultants, such as the Institutional Shareholder Services, recently have pushed to create, by means of relative performance evaluation (RPE), a tighter link between CEO pay and the factors under CEO control. This paper addresses the consequences of RPE for firm investment decisions […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Banking & Financial Institutions, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Executive Compensation, Financial Crisis, Financial Regulation
Tagged Agency costs, Agency model, Banker bonuses, Banks, Behavioral finance, Financial crisis, Financial regulation, Incentives, Management, Moral hazard, Pay for performance, Systemic risk
Comments Off on Incentive Pay and Systemic Risk
The Unicorn IPO Report
In the process of assembling our inaugural Unicorn IPO Report, we discovered something surprising. We set out to investigate “unicorn” companies, the modern reference to private companies with valuations exceeding $1 billion (our full criteria for what constitutes a unicorn company may be found in the Methodology section of this report). While the number of […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Boards of Directors, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation
Tagged Accounting, Board composition, Boards of Directors, Capital structure, Diversity, Dual-class stock, Equity offerings, IPOs, JOBS Act, Private firms, Public firms, Securities regulation, Tech companies, Venture capital firms
Comments Off on The Unicorn IPO Report
Information Intermediary or De Facto Standard Setter?: Field Evidence on the Indirect and Direct Influence of Proxy Advisors
Proxy advisory firms (PAs) are considered important and useful by some and overbearing by others. On the one hand, PAs fill an information intermediary role by processing large amounts of information and providing voting recommendations to institutional investors on matters such as executive compensation and governance. On the other hand, critics contend that PAs have […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Empirical Research, Institutional Investors
Tagged Boards of Directors, Information environment, Institutional Investors, Proxy advisors, Proxy voting, Shareholder voting
Comments Off on Information Intermediary or De Facto Standard Setter?: Field Evidence on the Indirect and Direct Influence of Proxy Advisors
S&P 1500 Pay-for-Performance Update: Strong Financials, Negative Shareholder Returns
Despite strong full-year 2018 financial results, shareholder returns were dampened by investor skepticism and potential headwinds heading into 2019. This trend is no surprise given our observations through the third quarter (see “S&P 1500 pay-for-performance update: Third quarter results beg the question, “Will 2018 be the high water mark for incentive payouts?” Executive Pay Matters, December […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Executive Compensation, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Equity-based compensation, Executive Compensation, Executive performance, Firm performance, Incentives, Management, Pay for performance, Say on pay
Comments Off on S&P 1500 Pay-for-Performance Update: Strong Financials, Negative Shareholder Returns
Keynote Remarks at the ICI Mutual Funds and Investment Management Conference
I. Introduction Thank you, Susan [Olson], for the kind introduction. I am excited to join you here and deliver my first formal speech as a Commissioner. It has been a little over six months since I started in my new role at the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), and I can still say that it’s […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications, Regulators Materials, Securities Regulation, Speeches & Testimony
Tagged Asset management, Boards of Directors, Institutional Investors, Proxy advisors, Proxy voting, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities regulation, Shareholder voting
Comments Off on Keynote Remarks at the ICI Mutual Funds and Investment Management Conference