-
Supported By:
Subscribe or Follow
Program on Corporate Governance Advisory Board
- Peter Atkins
- David Bell
- Kerry E. Berchem
- Richard Brand
- Daniel Burch
- Paul Choi
- Jesse Cohn
- Arthur B. Crozier Christine Davine
- Renata J. Ferrari
- Andrew Freedman
- Ray Garcia
- Byron Georgiou
- Joseph Hall
- Jason M. Halper William P. Mills
- David Millstone
- Theodore Mirvis
- Philip Richter
- Elina Tetelbaum
- Sebastian Tiller
- Marc Trevino Jonathan Watkins
- Steven J. Williams
HLS Faculty & Senior Fellows
Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation
A Regulatory Classification of Digital Assets
Cryptocurrency is back in the news with bitcoin and other digital assets plummeting and volatility roaring back after a year of relative calm. The exuberance of a bull market is giving way to the discovery that some in the industry have been swimming naked, and are only now being uncovered as the tide goes out. […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Securities Litigation & Enforcement, Securities Regulation
Tagged Bitcoin, Cryptocurrency, Financial technology, Howey test, ICOs, Information asymmetries, Information environment, Innovation, investor, SEC, SEC enforcement, Securities enforcement, Securities regulation
Comments Off on A Regulatory Classification of Digital Assets
Mutual Fund Voting on Corporate Political Disclosure
Support among the largest mutual funds for the Center for Political Accountability’s political disclosure resolution reached 53 percent in the 2018 proxy season, the highest level ever. Despite the eight-percentage point jump over 2017, the Big 3 institutional investors—Vanguard, BlackRock and Fidelity—continued to oppose shareholder requests that companies adopt transparency and accountability for their political […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Accountability, Boards of Directors, Disclosure, Institutional Investors, Mutual funds, Political spending, Shareholder voting
Comments Off on Mutual Fund Voting on Corporate Political Disclosure
Why Are Firms with More Managerial Ownership Worth Less?
In our paper Why Are Firms With More Managerial Ownership Worth Less?, we provide new evidence on the relationship between firm value and managerial ownership. An important and well-documented result in corporate finance is that firm value is positively correlated with managerial ownership over some range of ownership and then, beyond that range, becomes negatively correlated. […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Accounting & Disclosure, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Empirical Research
Tagged Agency costs, Entrenchment, Firm performance, Firm valuation, Incentives, Liquidity, Management, Market conditions, Ownership, Shareholder value, Skin in the game
Comments Off on Why Are Firms with More Managerial Ownership Worth Less?
Comments on the SEC Roundtable on Proxy Access
I am writing on behalf of Morrow Sodali. We are a global consultancy and service provider with expertise in corporate governance, proxy solicitation and a range of related services. We occupy a position at the center of the relationship between the companies that are our clients and the shareholders who invest in them. In addition […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation
Tagged Accountability, Boards of Directors, Institutional Investors, Proxy advisors, Proxy voting, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities regulation, Shareholder voting
Comments Off on Comments on the SEC Roundtable on Proxy Access
Supreme Court Review for Deal-Related Shareholder Litigation
In an important development that may ultimately provide relief from some frivolous deal-related shareholder litigation in federal courts, the Supreme Court agreed to decide a case that could bring an end to private actions under Section 14(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the general anti-fraud provision that governs tender offers. Emulex Corp. v. […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement, Securities Regulation
Tagged Exchange Act, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Section 14(e), Securities fraud, Securities litigation, Securities regulation, Shareholder suits, Supreme Court, U.S. federal courts
Comments Off on Supreme Court Review for Deal-Related Shareholder Litigation
Climate Change and Proxy Voting in the U.S. and Europe
Summary Investor awareness of environmental and social shareholder is growing on both sides on the Atlantic. European companies generally surpass U.S. firms on climate change disclosures. Climate change increasingly comes to a vote in the U.S. via the shareholder proposal process, and investors increasingly expressing support at the ballot. Shareholder resolution filings are relatively scarce […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Corporate Elections & Voting, Institutional Investors, International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Climate change, Engagement, ESG, Europe, Institutional Investors, International governance, Risk, Risk disclosure, Shareholder proposals, Shareholder voting, Short-termism, Sustainability
Comments Off on Climate Change and Proxy Voting in the U.S. and Europe
Blockholder Heterogeneity, Multiple Blocks, and the Dance Between Blockholders
In our recent article titled Blockholder Heterogeneity, Multiple Blocks, and the Dance between Blockholders, forthcoming in the Review of Financial Studies, we consider issues related to blockholder heterogeneity and coexistence. We collect data on the blockholders of approximately 3,000 companies during the 2001–2014 period. We document substantial heterogeneity in holding periods, position sizes, and positions […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Empirical Research, Institutional Investors
Tagged Blockholders, Institutional Investors, Mutual funds, Ownership
Comments Off on Blockholder Heterogeneity, Multiple Blocks, and the Dance Between Blockholders
Boardrooms Without Female Representation
Board diversity is a governance issue that has been getting a large amount of attention for the past couple of years. This year, gender diversity, particularly in relation to board member appointments, has been in the limelight. This heightened focus comes in part thanks to SB-826, a recently-passed California bill that will mandate that public companies […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Board composition, Boards of Directors, California, Director nominations, Director qualifications, Diversity, Institutional Investors, Overboarding
Comments Off on Boardrooms Without Female Representation
Oral Argument on Scheme Liability
On December 3, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in Lorenzo v. SEC, which involves an attempt by the SEC to use a “scheme liability” theory under Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act against an individual who did not “make” the misstatements at issue under Janus v. First Derivative Traders, 564 U.S. 135 […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement, Securities Regulation
Tagged Liability standards, Rule 10b-5, Section 10(b), Securities enforcement, Securities fraud, Securities litigation, Supreme Court
Comments Off on Oral Argument on Scheme Liability