Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation

D&O Insurance Policy Does Not Cover Costs in Appraisal Proceeding

The Delaware Supreme Court has held that D&O insurers are not required to cover costs incurred by a respondent corporation in an appraisal action. In re Solera Insurance Coverage Appeals, Nos. 413/418, 2019 (Del. Oct. 23, 2020). The en banc decision clarifies Delaware law on the scope of insurers’ responsibilities and reinforces that an appraisal […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on D&O Insurance Policy Does Not Cover Costs in Appraisal Proceeding

Law and Reputation

“Reputation matters” has become a mantra in the business world. And corporate legal scholars have been increasingly referring to reputational concerns as important forces that shape our behavior across a wide range of phenomena. Yet so far the legal literature has stayed remarkably silent on exactly how reputation works, or how reputation interacts with the […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Securities Litigation & Enforcement | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Law and Reputation

Audit Committee Challenges and Priorities in the Upcoming Quarter and Beyond

Introduction Does it feel like Groundhog Day? On a personal level, it may feel like each day blends into the next, and many of us find ourselves waiting for the current conditions to pass so things can get back to normal. But companies can’t simply take a wait-and-see attitude. They need to respond quickly to […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Boards of Directors, Executive Compensation, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Audit Committee Challenges and Priorities in the Upcoming Quarter and Beyond

What to Expect From the Biden Administration

Over the weekend, former Vice President Joseph R. Biden, Jr. was declared the winner of the U.S. presidential election. Although President Trump has yet to concede and press reports suggest he will continue to make his case in court, thoughts have turned to what the Biden administration will mean for federal regulation of business and […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Executive Compensation, Legislative & Regulatory Developments, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on What to Expect From the Biden Administration

Rewriting History II: The (Un)Predictable Past of ESG Ratings

Importance of ESG Ratings Research on environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) topics has exploded over the last years. The surge in academic work mirrors the massive rise in the importance of ESG principles in the investment management industry. For example, funds that invest according to ESG principles attracted net inflows of $71.1bn globally between […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Accounting & Disclosure, ESG, Institutional Investors | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Rewriting History II: The (Un)Predictable Past of ESG Ratings

Companies’ Response to Delaware Supreme Court Upholding Federal Forum Provisions

A review of charter and bylaw filings in the six months since the Delaware Supreme Court upheld federal forum provisions (“FFP”) shows that FFPs are becoming standard in the governing documents of IPO companies and among existing companies, an initial spike of adoptions that has steadily leveled off. On March 18, 2020, the Delaware Supreme […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Corporate Elections & Voting, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Companies’ Response to Delaware Supreme Court Upholding Federal Forum Provisions

2020 Top 250 Report

Overview and Background Since 1973, FW Cook has published annual reports on long-term incentive grant practices for executives. This report, our 48th edition, presents information on long-term incentives granted to executives at the 250 largest U.S. companies in the S&P 500 Index. It is intended to inform boards of directors and compensation professionals in designing […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Executive Compensation, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on 2020 Top 250 Report

Don’t Go Chasing Waterfalls: Fiduciary Obligations in the Shadow of Trados

In a newly-released working paper, we tackle a fundamental financial and governance conundrum that nearly every venture capital (VC) backed company faces: when there are multiple classes of stock, how should directors discharge their fiduciary duties? In a typical VC-backed firm, the founders and other early employees hold common stock while VC investors hold tranches […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Private Equity | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Don’t Go Chasing Waterfalls: Fiduciary Obligations in the Shadow of Trados

ISS Proposes 2021 Benchmark Voting Policy Changes

On October 14, 2020, ISS released its proposed voting policy changes for 2021. The changes for the United States focus mainly in these three areas: (1) racial and ethnic board diversity, (2) board oversight of environmental, climate and social risks and (3) exclusive forum provisions. ISS requests feedback on the proposed changes. Market participants can […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, ESG, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on ISS Proposes 2021 Benchmark Voting Policy Changes

SEC Extends Its Focus on MNPI Clearance Procedures

[On October 15, 2020], the SEC announced a settled enforcement action against a public company in connection with the company’s initiation of a stock buyback program while in possession of material, nonpublic information (“MNPI”). The Commission charged the company with violating Section 13(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act, which requires reporting companies to devise and maintain […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment