Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation

How Economic Attention Deficit Disorder Infected the Corporate Boardroom

According to one widely reported study, three quarters of senior American corporate officials would not make an investment that would benefit a company over the long run if it would derail even one quarterly earnings report. [1] Combine that with the fact that corporate officials and institutional investors commonly over-discount the future, meaning that they […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Accounting & Disclosure, Banking & Financial Institutions, Executive Compensation, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on How Economic Attention Deficit Disorder Infected the Corporate Boardroom

Implications of the Recent Dell Appraisal Decision

On May 31, Vice Chancellor Laster of the Delaware Court of Chancery held that, for purposes of Delaware’s appraisal statute, the fair value of the common stock of Dell Inc. at the time of its sale to a group including the Company’s founder Michael Dell was $17.62 per share, almost a third higher than the […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Implications of the Recent Dell Appraisal Decision

Financing Corporate Elections

There is a battle in progress between activist hedge funds and public companies over so-called “golden leash” payments. This is where an activist shareholder running a proxy contest promises to pay her slate of director-candidates a supplemental compensation, over and above the ordinary director fees paid by the company to all directors. The purpose of […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Court Cases | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Financing Corporate Elections

Venture-Backed IPOs in 2015

2015 proved to be a tough year for venture-backed IPOs with the total number of IPOs completed decreasing by 37% from 2014. Life sciences companies represented over a majority of the IPOs completed in 2015, almost all of which relied in some part on insider participation. The outlook for IPOs in 2016 is still uncertain […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Boards of Directors, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Executive Compensation, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Venture-Backed IPOs in 2015

CEO Pay at Valeant: Does Extreme Compensation Create Extreme Risk?

In our paper, CEO Pay at Valeant: Does Extreme Compensation Create Extreme Risk?, which was recently made publicly available on SSRN, we examine the relation between pay for performance and organizational risk. The litmus test for an effective executive compensation program is whether it provides incentive to attract, retain, and motivate qualified executives to pursue […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Boards of Directors, Empirical Research, Executive Compensation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on CEO Pay at Valeant: Does Extreme Compensation Create Extreme Risk?

SEC Amendment to Form 10-K

The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) announced on June 1, 2016 that it has approved an interim final amendment to Form 10-K, implementing Section 72001 of the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (“FAST”) Act, [1] to expressly permit issuers to provide a summary of business and financial information contained in the annual report, provided that each […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Legislative & Regulatory Developments, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on SEC Amendment to Form 10-K

SEC Enforcement: Private Equity Broker Registration

On June 1, 2016, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced the settlement of an enforcement action against a private equity firm and its owner, alleging that the firm acted as an unregistered broker-dealer in connection with activities commonly conducted by sponsors of private equity funds. [1] Although several improprieties under the Investment Advisers Act […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Practitioner Publications, Private Equity, Securities Litigation & Enforcement | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on SEC Enforcement: Private Equity Broker Registration

What are the Consequences of Regulating Executive Compensation?

The level and structure of executive compensation has been a frequently debated topic among politicians, CEOs, and academics since the financial crisis of 2007-2009. Critiques of compensation practices at financial services companies often attribute the crisis at least in part to incentive pay that purportedly encourages excessive risk taking. Regulators in Europe and the US […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Banking & Financial Institutions, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Empirical Research, Executive Compensation, Financial Regulation, International Corporate Governance & Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on What are the Consequences of Regulating Executive Compensation?

The New EU Market Abuse Regulation

• A new Market Abuse Regulation will apply across the European Union (EU) from July 3, 2016, replacing the previous market abuse regimes that existed in EU Member States and applied only to instruments traded on EU regulated markets. • For the first time, issuers of securities on previously unregulated exchanges across the EU will […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Legislative & Regulatory Developments, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The New EU Market Abuse Regulation

Weekly Roundup: June 10–June 16, 2016

Accounting for Rising Corporate Profits: Intangibles or Regulatory Rents? Posted by Jim Bessen, Boston University School of Law, on Friday, June 10, 2016 Tags: Accounting, Consumer protection, Efficiency, Firm performance, Firm valuation, Innovation, Lobbying, Market efficiency, Political spending, Profitability, R&D, Rent-seeking Chelsea Therapeutics: Management Projections & Fiduciary Duties Posted by Steven Epstein, Fried, Frank, Harris, […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Weekly Roundup | Tagged | Comments Off on Weekly Roundup: June 10–June 16, 2016