Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation

Light at the End of the (Channel) Tunnel

The decision to hold a referendum as to whether the United Kingdom (UK) should remain a member of the European Union (EU) introduced the term “Brexit” into the global political lexicon. Now that the UK has voted to leave the EU, the term has spawned new variations: will the UK’s departure be a “soft-Brexit” or […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Banking & Financial Institutions, Financial Regulation, International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Light at the End of the (Channel) Tunnel

Engagement: New Imperatives

Investors expect a new approach to engagement—one that covers important topics, meets their needs, and often involves directors. Companies with effective engagement programs are seizing the opportunity to build important relationships with long-term shareholders before crises hit. And they’re taking credit for them publicly, setting the bar higher for other companies. So how does your company […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Engagement: New Imperatives

The Role of Mutual Funds in Corporate Governance

Mutual funds hold about a quarter to a third of outstanding shares of U.S. companies in the past decade and therefore have the potential to play a pivotal role in corporate governance. In our article, The Role of Mutual Funds in Corporate Governance: Evidence from Mutual Funds’ Proxy Voting and Trading Behavior, forthcoming in the […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Corporate Elections & Voting, Institutional Investors | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Role of Mutual Funds in Corporate Governance

Seven Deadly Fallacies of Activist Investing’s Critics

Attacks on activist investing often tread a familiar and well-worn road, long on inflammatory rhetoric and specious arguments and short on reason and respect for the facts. A recent example is a commentary by two Wachtell Lipton lawyers entitled “Corporate Governance Update: Holding Activists and Proxy Advisory Firms Accountable,” published in the New York Law Journal […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Institutional Investors, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Seven Deadly Fallacies of Activist Investing’s Critics

Does the Market Value CEO Styles?

In our article, Does the Market Value CEO Styles?, recently published in the American Economic Review, we study how investors perceive the skill set that different types of CEOs bring into their companies. A growing body of research offers evidence that CEOs and other top executives show large and persistent person-specific heterogeneity in their management […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Empirical Research | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Does the Market Value CEO Styles?

Focusing the Lens of Disclosure on Board Diversity, Non-GAAP, and Sustainability

Investors and regulators everywhere share a common interest in effective disclosures, robust corporate governance practices and strong corporate cultures, which are fundamental for fair and efficient markets and to achieve sustainable value. But, as the preamble to ICGN’s Global Governance Principles acknowledges, there are differences from jurisdiction to jurisdiction as to what precisely we are […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Boards of Directors, Practitioner Publications, Regulators Materials, Securities Regulation, Speeches & Testimony | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Focusing the Lens of Disclosure on Board Diversity, Non-GAAP, and Sustainability

Brexit: What Does the Vote Mean for Business?

[On June 24, 2016], it was announced that the UK public has voted to leave the European Union. There will now be a negotiation of a new relationship between the UK and Europe. The fact of the vote itself has no legal effect on the laws of the UK or EU. The UK will remain […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Banking & Financial Institutions, Financial Regulation, International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Brexit: What Does the Vote Mean for Business?

Pushbacks and Delaware Appraisal Arbitrage

For over a decade hedge funds have utilized Delaware’s appraisal statute as a strategy to arbitrage either the statutory interest rate, or the possibility of a litigated capital gain, or both. Typically, hedge funds will buy into the stock of the target company after a merger is announced, and then litigate or settle the case […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Corporate Elections & Voting, Court Cases, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Pushbacks and Delaware Appraisal Arbitrage

Do Courts Matter for Firm Value? Evidence from the U.S. Court System

Courts provide an important link between the legal system and economic development. Our paper, Do Courts Matter for Firm Value? Evidence from the U.S. Court System, which is publicly available on SSRN, studies if and how courts affect firm value. We distinguish between two main channels through which courts can impact firm value. First, courts […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Court Cases, Empirical Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Do Courts Matter for Firm Value? Evidence from the U.S. Court System

The Legal Consequences of Brexit

On June 23, 2016, the UK electorate voted to leave the European Union. The referendum was advisory rather than mandatory and does not have any immediate legal consequences. It will, however, have a profound effect. With any next steps being driven by UK and EU politics, it is difficult to predict the future of the […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Banking & Financial Institutions, Financial Regulation, International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Legal Consequences of Brexit