Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation

Earnings and the Value of Voting Rights

In our recent paper, Earnings and the Value of Voting Rights, we examine the impact of earnings announcements on the value of shareholder voting rights (i.e., voting premium). Earnings are associated with and indicative of the efficiency in the management of the company. We contend that earnings not only inform investors regarding the risky stream […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Corporate Elections & Voting, Empirical Research | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Earnings and the Value of Voting Rights

Change You Can Believe In? Hedge Fund Data Revisions

What do we know about hedge funds? Despite the miles of column inches devoted to the hedge fund industry in the financial and popular press, relatively little is known about their trading strategies, risk profiles, liquidity needs, or potential for impact on systemic risk. In the wake of the recent financial crisis, the Securities and […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Accounting & Disclosure, Empirical Research, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Change You Can Believe In? Hedge Fund Data Revisions

Delaware Court of Chancery: Merger Disclosure Claims Must Be Brought Pre-Closing

The Delaware Court of Chancery yesterday held that claims challenging the sufficiency of merger disclosures should be pursued before the merger closes if they are to be pursued at all. An Nguyen v. Michael G. Barrett, et al., C.A. No. 11511-VCG (Del. Ch. Sept. 28, 2016). The lawsuit challenged the disclosures issued by Millennial Media in […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Court Cases, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Delaware Court of Chancery: Merger Disclosure Claims Must Be Brought Pre-Closing

AML Obligations of Broker-Dealers

Since 2002, as part of their anti-money laundering (“AML”) responsibilities, broker/dealers have had a gatekeeper-like obligation to monitor customers for “suspicious” activities and to report those activities to the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”). In the words of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), “Just as firms have a primary responsibility to supervise […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Financial Regulation, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on AML Obligations of Broker-Dealers

A Unified Theory of Insider Trading Law

In the United States, insider trading law is premised on an anti-fraud statute—Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934—and therefore liability turns on theories about why insider trading is fraudulent. For nearly forty years, courts have relied on the “classical theory” to explain the classic case of insider trading, where a corporate insider […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Accounting & Disclosure, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on A Unified Theory of Insider Trading Law

Weekly Roundup: September 23–September 29, 2016

The Board’s Role in FCPA Compliance Posted by David A. Katz and Laura A. McIntosh, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Friday, September 23, 2016 Tags: Anti-corruption, Board communication, Board leadership, Boards of Directors, Compliance & ethics, Corporate culture, Engagement, FCPA, International governance, Misconduct, Oversight, Reputation, Risk oversight, Securities regulation Securities Regulation in the Interconnected, […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Weekly Roundup | Tagged | Comments Off on Weekly Roundup: September 23–September 29, 2016

Preparing for the 2017 US Proxy and Annual Reporting Season

With autumn just beginning, the proxy and annual reporting season may seem a long way off. However, in light of the amount of work and planning that goes into the proxy statement, annual report and annual meeting of shareholders, this is the ideal time to begin preparations. This post provides an overview of key issues that […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Executive Compensation, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Preparing for the 2017 US Proxy and Annual Reporting Season

90 Cents of Every “Pay-for-Performance” Dollar are Paid for Luck

It is well-known that CEOs are sometimes rewarded for luck. The classic example is that of oil company CEOs whose compensations increase with the price of oil (Bertrand and Mullainathan 2001). This has been show to hold for other factors that are both outside the control of the manager, and observable to the boards who […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Accounting & Disclosure, Empirical Research, Executive Compensation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on 90 Cents of Every “Pay-for-Performance” Dollar are Paid for Luck

21st Century Markets Need 21st Century Regulation

Today [September 21, 2016], I want to talk about the ongoing transformation of the world’s trading markets from analog to digital, from human to algorithmic trading and from stand-alone centers to seamless trading webs. I will describe how market regulation by the CFTC, particularly, and other agencies, generally, has not kept pace with this transformation […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Banking & Financial Institutions, Financial Regulation, Regulators Materials, Speeches & Testimony | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on 21st Century Markets Need 21st Century Regulation

Do Heterogeneous Firms Select Their Right “Size” of Corporate Governance Arrangements?

One-size-does-not-fit-all in corporate law and governance. But do firms really choose their right “size” of governance as conventional wisdom holds? That one-size-does-not-fit-all is frequently used to object mandatory corporate law and other sorts of intervention, such as proxy advisory firms’ voting recommendations, which presumably interfere with firms’ tailoring governance arrangements to their specific needs. Surprisingly, […]

Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Boards of Directors, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Corporate Elections & Voting, Securities Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Do Heterogeneous Firms Select Their Right “Size” of Corporate Governance Arrangements?